So Howard Dean (he of the infamous scream) really is a loon

[133743Hokie]

Talking with reporters today, Dean intimates that Trumps "sniffing" during the debate is a sign of cocaine use. Can he just go back in his hole?

[absolutvt03]

Seinfeld taught me it was either that or an allergy to a nearby sweater.

[oaktonhokie]

SOP for the socialists.

Harry Reid, the most despicable person in the world, went to the well of the Senate and said he was told that Romney hadn't paid taxes. It doesn't have to be true, just alleged by the socialists.

It's what they do.

Talking with reporters today, Dean intimates that Trumps "sniffing" during the debate is a sign of cocaine use. Can he just go back in his hole?

[HokieHam]

Talking with reporters today, Dean intimates that Trumps "sniffing" during the debate is a sign of cocaine use. Can he just go back in his hole?

His "Yeeeeeaaaahhhh" moment made me think his dumb ass was on drugs......

[HokieHam]

SOP for the socialists.

Harry Reid, the most despicable person in the world, went to the well of the Senate and said he was told that Romney hadn't paid taxes. It doesn't have to be true, just alleged by the socialists.

It's what they do.

Talking with reporters today, Dean intimates that Trumps "sniffing" during the debate is a sign of cocaine use. Can he just go back in his hole?

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

[nolanvt]

Maybe Trump likes hanging out with Doc Gooden and Strawberry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Attila T Hun]

Maybe Trump likes hanging out with Doc Gooden and Strawberry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, those guys are your squeeze.

[absolutvt03]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

[USN_Hokie]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

No, I can't. Help us out.

It sounded like his mic was turned up and just normal breathing to me. This is stuff for low information types to gobble up - it wasn't "pleasant" but doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Trump for; making a big deal out of this just makes people look stupid.

[absolutvt03]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

No, I can't. Help us out.

It sounded like his mic was turned up and just normal breathing to me. This is stuff for low information types to gobble up - it wasn't "pleasant" but doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Trump for; making a big deal out of this just makes people look stupid.

Sure I'll help you out. The forum would be full of "Clinton is sick" posts where people speculated that she had everything from cancer to hysterical pregnancy. You're right, low information types gobble stuff like that up which is why it plays so well here. I never said I thought anything was wrong with Trump. Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me. But the idea that it's only one side that engages in "smear tactics" is laughable which is what I was pointing out.

[HokieHam]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

No, I can't. Help us out.

It sounded like his mic was turned up and just normal breathing to me. This is stuff for low information types to gobble up - it wasn't "pleasant" but doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Trump for; making a big deal out of this just makes people look stupid.

Sure I'll help you out. The forum would be full of "Clinton is sick" posts where people speculated that she had everything from cancer to hysterical pregnancy. You're right, low information types gobble stuff like that up which is why it plays so well here. I never said I thought anything was wrong with Trump. Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me. But the idea that it's only one side that engages in "smear tactics" is laughable which is what I was pointing out.

Uh.......hey......Clinton's health is an issue. If you happen to recall......she recently passed out in hot humid 77 degree weather. And then they lied about it continually......talk about dense.

[RiverguyVT]

Trump should sue Dean.

[RiverguyVT]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

LWNJs equating accusations and reality is my favorite part

[HokieHam]

Trump should sue Dean.

I hope he does.

[USN_Hokie]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

No, I can't. Help us out.

It sounded like his mic was turned up and just normal breathing to me. This is stuff for low information types to gobble up - it wasn't "pleasant" but doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Trump for; making a big deal out of this just makes people look stupid.

Sure I'll help you out. The forum would be full of "Clinton is sick" posts where people speculated that she had everything from cancer to hysterical pregnancy. You're right, low information types gobble stuff like that up which is why it plays so well here. I never said I thought anything was wrong with Trump. Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me. But the idea that it's only one side that engages in "smear tactics" is laughable which is what I was pointing out.

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

[awesome guy]

Yup. It's all they have.

Smear tactics.....taxes, cocaine, this bimbo Venezuelan.....can't run on failed policies.

I can't decide if my favorite part of this thread is the hypocrisy or the complete lack of awareness of it.

Can you imagine if Clinton had been sniffling like Trump?

No, I can't. Help us out.

It sounded like his mic was turned up and just normal breathing to me. This is stuff for low information types to gobble up - it wasn't "pleasant" but doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize Trump for; making a big deal out of this just makes people look stupid.

Sure I'll help you out. The forum would be full of "Clinton is sick" posts where people speculated that she had everything from cancer to hysterical pregnancy. You're right, low information types gobble stuff like that up which is why it plays so well here. I never said I thought anything was wrong with Trump. Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me. But the idea that it's only one side that engages in "smear tactics" is laughable which is what I was pointing out.

you think talking about the lady falling down all the time, passing out, and displaying bizarre behavior is just a smear? SMH, and you wonder why you have a reputation as a dunce.

[absolutvt03]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

[VisorBoy]

Talking with reporters today, Dean intimates that Trumps "sniffing" during the debate is a sign of cocaine use. Can he just go back in his hole?

So dumb, if true. This is the kind of tabloid conspiracy that is posted and supported on this site everyday (switched parties). Glad the right-wingers can at least identify it from the Dems. Now, to get them to identify it from the Pubs.

[USN_Hokie]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

I even highlighted the text (the new, higher standard of scrutiny nobody ever argued against) for you, little guy. Figured that would be easy enough for you to figure out, sorry. Maybe you'll read slower this time and then take another shot at responding. C'mon, you can do it.

[absolutvt03]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

I even highlighted the text (the new, higher standard of scrutiny nobody ever argued against) for you, little guy. Figured that would be easy enough for you to figure out, sorry. Maybe you'll read slower this time and then take another shot at responding. C'mon, you can do it.

You responded and yet said nothing and answered none of the questions I asked. Instead of tossing out inane insults like "little guy", I'll simply ask again:

Show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean?

[USN_Hokie]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

I even highlighted the text (the new, higher standard of scrutiny nobody ever argued against) for you, little guy. Figured that would be easy enough for you to figure out, sorry. Maybe you'll read slower this time and then take another shot at responding. C'mon, you can do it.

You responded and yet said nothing and answered none of the questions I asked. Instead of tossing out inane insults like "little guy", I'll simply ask again:

Show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean?

Show me the post that question is supposedly a response to? You're an angry little man, absolute. You impeach your own character with your pettiness.

[absolutvt03]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

I even highlighted the text (the new, higher standard of scrutiny nobody ever argued against) for you, little guy. Figured that would be easy enough for you to figure out, sorry. Maybe you'll read slower this time and then take another shot at responding. C'mon, you can do it.

You responded and yet said nothing and answered none of the questions I asked. Instead of tossing out inane insults like "little guy", I'll simply ask again:

Show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean?

Show me the post that question is supposedly a response to? You're an angry little man, absolute. You impeach your own character with your pettiness.

Not angry at all so I'm not sure where you got that. I'd argue that calling strangers "little guy" and "angry little man" from behind the safety of a computer screen is more evidence of being emotional and angry than anything I've written. I was just trying to get you to back up your false claims and answer a direct question for once. I'll take it that you decided to deflect the question yet again because you have no response. Your last two posts have been nothing but personal insults but I'm the one who is angry...

[awesome guy]

Your reasoning is retarded. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton has some (serious) health issues. She had to be dragged into her scooby doo ambulance unconscious two and a half weeks ago. If she was demonstrating erratic mannerisms during the debate (and again, I think this is a mic issue), that would be a reasonable question to ask. So, unless you or Howard Dean have some evidence that Trump has a coke problem, your post is stupid.

Nice try at the end trying to move the goalposts. You can't escape from your ridiculous argument, sorry. Own it.

I'm not sure you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. Please though tell me what my "ridiculous argument" is? Are you saying that conservatives don't engage in smear tactics? You basically admit that what I said would happen is correct and then turn around and say it's "ridiculous". So which is it? If you want to talk about moving the goalposts show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean? Given that I've joked about a Seinfeld episode in one post and flat out said "Him sniffling or breathing into the mic if you'd rather means nothing to me." I think you're going to be hard-pressed to do that. Your go to retort is to create an argument someone didn't make and then try to argue against that. Own it.

I even highlighted the text (the new, higher standard of scrutiny nobody ever argued against) for you, little guy. Figured that would be easy enough for you to figure out, sorry. Maybe you'll read slower this time and then take another shot at responding. C'mon, you can do it.

You responded and yet said nothing and answered none of the questions I asked. Instead of tossing out inane insults like "little guy", I'll simply ask again:

Show me any place I even remotely agreed with Howard Dean?

Show me the post that question is supposedly a response to? You're an angry little man, absolute. You impeach your own character with your pettiness.

Not angry at all so I'm not sure where you got that. I'd argue that calling strangers "little guy" and "angry little man" from behind the safety of a computer screen is more evidence of being emotional and angry than anything I've written. I was just trying to get you to back up your false claims and answer a direct question for once. I'll take it that you decided to deflect the question yet again because you have no response. Your last two posts have been nothing but personal insults but I'm the one who is angry...

You are an angry and petty little man. Own it or change it.

[absolutvt03]

Show me the post that question is supposedly a response to? You're an angry little man, absolute. You impeach your own character with your pettiness.

You are an angry and petty little man. Own it or change it.

"Let's be a little more civil, shall we? You've been so well behaved lately, but you're regressing. Shame."

[awesome guy]

Show me the post that question is supposedly a response to? You're an angry little man, absolute. You impeach your own character with your pettiness.

You are an angry and petty little man. Own it or change it.

"Let's be a little more civil, shall we? You've been so well behaved lately, but you're regressing. Shame."

[emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

Way to prove the point