Uh-oh

[oaktonhokie]

What, he objectified a woman?

It's a BEAUTY CONTEST. Objectify is what they do.

She got into pornography, drugs and threatened a judge.

And as the lovely hillary said, "You can be sure she'll vote.

What is the definition of deplorable again...?



quote="ip_law-hokie"]Our boy trump looks to be an asshole.

This will not play well with the ladies.

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrat ... 291429289/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

[HokieFanDC]

What, he objectified a woman?

It's a BEAUTY CONTEST. Objectify is what they do.

She got into pornography, drugs and threatened a judge.

And as the lovely hillary said, "You can be sure she'll vote.

What is the definition of deplorable again...?



quote="ip_law-hokie"]Our boy trump looks to be an asshole.

This will not play well with the ladies.

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrat ... 291429289/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[/quote]

Calling someone names is not "objectifying".

[RiverguyVT]

What, he objectified a woman?

It's a BEAUTY CONTEST. Objectify is what they do.

She got into pornography, drugs and threatened a judge.

And as the lovely hillary said, "You can be sure she'll vote.

What is the definition of deplorable again...?



quote="ip_law-hokie"]Our boy trump looks to be an asshole.

This will not play well with the ladies.

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrat ... 291429289/

Calling someone names is not "objectifying".[/quote]

Regardless. Calling an accomplice to attempted murder, one who threatened a judge's life and one is a porn star, "Miss Piggy" hardly raises to Bill C's rapes and sexual assaults of honest good citizens, much less to the level of biting one in the face until she bled.

Calling her fat is darn near the very definition of objectifying.

I hope the Clinton camp DOES start that conversation

[HokieFanDC]

What, he objectified a woman?

It's a BEAUTY CONTEST. Objectify is what they do.

She got into pornography, drugs and threatened a judge.

And as the lovely hillary said, "You can be sure she'll vote.

What is the definition of deplorable again...?



quote="ip_law-hokie"]Our boy trump looks to be an asshole.

This will not play well with the ladies.

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrat ... 291429289/

Calling someone names is not "objectifying".

Regardless. Calling an accomplice to attempted murder, one who threatened a judge's life and one is a porn star, "Miss Piggy" hardly raises to Bill C's rapes and sexual assaults of honest good citizens, much less to the level of biting one in the face until she bled.

Calling her fat is darn near the very definition of objectifying.

I hope the Clinton camp DOES start that conversation[/quote]

I don't get what conversation you want him to start. The one that says, "OK, I'm an a-hole but your husband is a bigger one"?

That's not exactly a recipe for winning votes. Being even a little bit contrite or humble could have diffused this, but that's not who he is.

[USN_Hokie]

It is interesting to speculate. Hillary, for obvious reasons, seems extremely beatable. Nobody was beating Obama. If Mitt Romney happened to peak politically this election cycle against Hillary rather than 4 years ago against Obama, I think he'd do much better than Trump. He'd be a pretty easy vote for much of the middle and swing voters and Hillary isn't driving a lot of voter turn out like Obama did.

Trump has got a certain base fired up, maybe even some are non-traditional voters, but I think there are a whole lot more folks that just find him too ill-tempered and inappropriate to be POTUS. Who knows, hard to play the if's and but's game.

I think people underestimate / misconstrue the very real anti-establishment element to Trump's campaign. People are absolutely sick of the politicians in DC right now. Paul Ryan's name is practically mud. I don't think Romney would fair any better; personally I think this election is larger than the candidates.

[awesome guy]

Miss Piggy - liberals feigning outrage over what is said.

Clinton raping women and Hillary slut shaming the victims - liberals not caring about what actions were taken.

[USN_Hokie]

I don't get what conversation you want him to start. The one that says, "OK, I'm an a-hole but your husband is a bigger one"?

That's not exactly a recipe for winning votes. Being even a little bit contrite or humble could have diffused this, but that's not who he is.

He doesn't need to win any votes. There's a whole generation of female voters out there who have no concept of Bill Clinton's philandering - which if he were caught doing today (like blowing your DNA all over a female whom you have positional authority over - some would call that rape today) would be the end of anyone related to him. If Trump highlights that (as well as her attacks on the accusers), it might make some younger Hillary voters think twice about supporting her.

[HokieFanDC]

I don't get what conversation you want him to start. The one that says, "OK, I'm an a-hole but your husband is a bigger one"?

That's not exactly a recipe for winning votes. Being even a little bit contrite or humble could have diffused this, but that's not who he is.

He doesn't need to win any votes. There's a whole generation of female voters out there who have no concept of Bill Clinton's philandering - which if he were caught doing today (like blowing your DNA all over a female whom you have positional authority over - some would call that rape today) would be the end of anyone related to him. If Trump highlights that (as well as her attacks on the accusers), it might make some younger Hillary voters think twice about supporting her.

Of course he needs to win votes, or cause Hillary to lose votes. His handling of this cheapshot attack is lame, and he will most likely lose votes from it. Talking about Bill Clinton isn't going to persuade many people not to vote for Hillary. In today's environment, they will just see her as a victim of Bill, and still support her.

[USN_Hokie]

I don't get what conversation you want him to start. The one that says, "OK, I'm an a-hole but your husband is a bigger one"?

That's not exactly a recipe for winning votes. Being even a little bit contrite or humble could have diffused this, but that's not who he is.

He doesn't need to win any votes. There's a whole generation of female voters out there who have no concept of Bill Clinton's philandering - which if he were caught doing today (like blowing your DNA all over a female whom you have positional authority over - some would call that rape today) would be the end of anyone related to him. If Trump highlights that (as well as her attacks on the accusers), it might make some younger Hillary voters think twice about supporting her.

Of course he needs to win votes, or cause Hillary to lose votes.

Yeah, that was exactly my point.

[BG Hokie]

It is interesting to speculate. Hillary, for obvious reasons, seems extremely beatable. Nobody was beating Obama. If Mitt Romney happened to peak politically this election cycle against Hillary rather than 4 years ago against Obama, I think he'd do much better than Trump. He'd be a pretty easy vote for much of the middle and swing voters and Hillary isn't driving a lot of voter turn out like Obama did.

Trump has got a certain base fired up, maybe even some are non-traditional voters, but I think there are a whole lot more folks that just find him too ill-tempered and inappropriate to be POTUS. Who knows, hard to play the if's and but's game.

I think people underestimate / misconstrue the very real anti-establishment element to Trump's campaign. People are absolutely sick of the politicians in DC right now. Paul Ryan's name is practically mud. I don't think Romney would fair any better; personally I think this election is larger than the candidates.

I certainly agree that this election is bigger than the candidates. I'm just not sure I agree that, at the end of the day, the voters who wouldn't have voted at all will vote for Trump at a rate higher than those voters that will not vote for Trump over Clinton but would have voted Romney over Clinton.

[absolutvt03]

It is interesting to speculate. Hillary, for obvious reasons, seems extremely beatable. Nobody was beating Obama. If Mitt Romney happened to peak politically this election cycle against Hillary rather than 4 years ago against Obama, I think he'd do much better than Trump. He'd be a pretty easy vote for much of the middle and swing voters and Hillary isn't driving a lot of voter turn out like Obama did.

Trump has got a certain base fired up, maybe even some are non-traditional voters, but I think there are a whole lot more folks that just find him too ill-tempered and inappropriate to be POTUS. Who knows, hard to play the if's and but's game.

Yep, I would have gladly voted for some of the more moderate Republican candidates.

[absolutvt03]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

[ip_law-hokie]

This might be the dumbest political attack I've seen since Mitt Romney Haircut Rape.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pol ... ?cid=sm_fb


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[USN_Hokie]

This might be the dumbest political attack I've seen since Mitt Romney Haircut Rape.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pol ... ?cid=sm_fb


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online poll.

[HokieHam]

This might be the dumbest political attack I've seen since Mitt Romney Haircut Rape.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pol ... ?cid=sm_fb


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online poll.

.....and fringe source.

[USN_Hokie]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

[HokieHam]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

....and funny how Cosmo had a story on this dingbat ready and waiting to go.

[absolutvt03]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

Yeah having sex on the Real World is not being a porn star or releasing a sex tape.

[USN_Hokie]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

Yeah having sex on the Real World is not being a porn star or releasing a sex tape.

You're right....aside from the taped sex part, it's not a sex tape.

[absolutvt03]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

Yeah having sex on the Real World is not being a porn star or releasing a sex tape.

You're right....aside from the taped sex part, it's not a sex tape.

I'm not sure if you're really this dense or just acting that way. The "sex tape" doesn't show any part of anyone's bodies. There's zero nudity. It happened during a reality show (sort of like the Real World) which if it's anything like our reality shows it's most likely 90% scripted. And because nothing is shown there's no way to know whether anyone's actually having sex or just acting. So no, it's NOT a sex tape. Trashy? Sure. But no more so than stuff that happens on TV every single day. And am I to assume you're backing down from the whole "porn star" accusation?

[USN_Hokie]

Oh, and she's also a porn star:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/porn- ... y-clinton/

Appears that's actually not true. She did pose for Playboy which I guess qualifies her to be first lady?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1875985/a ... -the-farm/

Yeah having sex on the Real World is not being a porn star or releasing a sex tape.

You're right....aside from the taped sex part, it's not a sex tape.

I'm not sure if you're really this dense or just acting that way. The "sex tape" doesn't show any part of anyone's bodies. There's zero nudity. It happened during a reality show (sort of like the Real World) which if it's anything like our reality shows it's most likely 90% scripted. And because nothing is shown there's no way to know whether anyone's actually having sex or just acting. So no, it's NOT a sex tape. Trashy? Sure. But no more so than stuff that happens on TV every single day. And am I to assume you're backing down from the whole "porn star" accusation?

I, on the other hand, am pretty sure you are this dense. Do you know what the definition of sex is, Mr. Clinton absolute?

She engaged in videotapped sex for money, was reportedly knocked up by a drug kingpin, admitted to being an accomplice to crime on live TV, and threatened a judge. You guys should totally continue to make this woman the face of the democrat campaign. I'm sure Hillary's "husband" is behind her 100%.

[absolutvt03]

I, on the other hand, am pretty sure you are this dense. Do you know what the definition of sex is, Mr. Clinton absolute?

She engaged in videotapped sex for money, was reportedly knocked up by a drug kingpin, admitted to being an accomplice to crime on live TV, and threatened a judge. You guys should totally continue to make this woman the face of the democrat campaign. I'm sure Hillary's "husband" is behind her 100%.

I do. Apparently you do not if you think a grainy video from a reality show showing zero nudity equates to sex or makes someone a "porn star". Just admit you grabbed a link, didn't bother to research it, and stuck your foot in your mouth. I don't really care about what the woman did or didn't do, I just saw your link and followed up on it and thought you might want to know at least part of it was a stretch, if not completely false. I should have known you were too proud and stubborn to care about facts (sounds like someone else I know). And of course nevermind that all of this is just an attempt to distract from Trump making yet more misogynistic comments.

[ip_law-hokie]

It is interesting to speculate. Hillary, for obvious reasons, seems extremely beatable. Nobody was beating Obama. If Mitt Romney happened to peak politically this election cycle against Hillary rather than 4 years ago against Obama, I think he'd do much better than Trump. He'd be a pretty easy vote for much of the middle and swing voters and Hillary isn't driving a lot of voter turn out like Obama did.

Trump has got a certain base fired up, maybe even some are non-traditional voters, but I think there are a whole lot more folks that just find him too ill-tempered and inappropriate to be POTUS. Who knows, hard to play the if's and but's game.

Yep, I would have gladly voted for some of the more moderate Republican candidates.

Same here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[USN_Hokie]

I, on the other hand, am pretty sure you are this dense. Do you know what the definition of sex is, Mr. Clinton absolute?

She engaged in videotapped sex for money, was reportedly knocked up by a drug kingpin, admitted to being an accomplice to crime on live TV, and threatened a judge. You guys should totally continue to make this woman the face of the democrat campaign. I'm sure Hillary's "husband" is behind her 100%.

I do. Apparently you do not if you think a grainy video from a reality show showing zero nudity equates to sex or makes someone a "porn star". Just admit you grabbed a link, didn't bother to research it, and stuck your foot in your mouth. I don't really care about what the woman did or didn't do, I just saw your link and followed up on it and thought you might want to know at least part of it was a stretch, if not completely false. I should have known you were too proud and stubborn to care about facts (sounds like someone else I know). And of course nevermind that all of this is just an attempt to distract from Trump making yet more misogynistic comments.

LOL...I provided more evidence in this link than you have. Yet, you want to try and accuse me of not researching?

This is rich. You are delusional.

[absolutvt03]

I, on the other hand, am pretty sure you are this dense. Do you know what the definition of sex is, Mr. Clinton absolute?

She engaged in videotapped sex for money, was reportedly knocked up by a drug kingpin, admitted to being an accomplice to crime on live TV, and threatened a judge. You guys should totally continue to make this woman the face of the democrat campaign. I'm sure Hillary's "husband" is behind her 100%.

I do. Apparently you do not if you think a grainy video from a reality show showing zero nudity equates to sex or makes someone a "porn star". Just admit you grabbed a link, didn't bother to research it, and stuck your foot in your mouth. I don't really care about what the woman did or didn't do, I just saw your link and followed up on it and thought you might want to know at least part of it was a stretch, if not completely false. I should have known you were too proud and stubborn to care about facts (sounds like someone else I know). And of course nevermind that all of this is just an attempt to distract from Trump making yet more misogynistic comments.

LOL...I provided more evidence in this link than you have. Yet, you want to try and accuse me of not researching?

This is rich. You are delusional.

No I'm not accusing you. I'm flat out saying it. You read a story from one source and ran with it which is fine but in this case that source was at best embellishing the details to make it look worse than it really was. I'm happy to post my evidence but I just figured since you'd already walked back from "porn star" to "might have had sex on a reality show" that you'd accepted that your original link was inaccurate. I'm not sure how that makes me delusional but whatever makes you feel better.


http://www.snopes.com/alicia-machado-adult-star/