United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:16 am

Time zone: America/New_York


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then


Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then


Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
[quote="awesome guy"]Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then


Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh[/quote]

It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
[quote="ip_law-hokie"][quote="awesome guy"]Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then


Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh[/quote]

It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Another in depth/inept explanation.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
[quote="awesome guy"][quote="ip_law-hokie"][quote="awesome guy"]Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.


Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then


Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh[/quote]

It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Another in depth/inept explanation.[/quote]

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
[quote="ip_law-hokie"][/quote]

Image

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 6258
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
IP should be cautious about supporting lawsuits for meanness and pettiness. Some gangster could also tag his fence around his 2x10 backyard and then he can't paint it over or tear it down.

No way this stands. I think it's time we impeach these kook judges, like the one that blocked DACA dissolution, as the judicial branch is out of control. Their power has gone to their heads.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:12 am
Posts: 5274
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.

_________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire


"Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat" Karl Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:27 pm
Posts: 2126
ip_law-hokie wrote:
on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e


Apparently Jeter wants to remove that hideous mural in centerfield of MArlins Park that looks to be designed by a blind 6 year old, but he can't because it is considered "art" or some bullshit. This sounds like much of the same. 99% of NYC is a craphole, anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:27 pm
Posts: 2126
So, If I read correctly, if he would have just torn down the buildings as planned, as as his right as property owner, there would have been no issue?? LOL- tear down graffit- no big deal, oh well "artist" too bad your art was torn down for high rises.. BUT PAINT over it before tear down?? nope, that will cost you 6.7 million. LOL- the judge should give that money to the thousands of starving kids in NYC.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:27 pm
Posts: 2126
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:48 pm
Posts: 10246
That happens to be high quality outdoor aerosol art.



ip_law-hokie wrote:
on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e

_________________
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 10221
ip_law-hokie wrote:
on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e



Life ain’t always what it seems when you come from out of town...huh-huh—huh-huh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.


You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
CFB Apologist wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous


That’s incorrect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.


You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10576
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.


You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.


Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.

My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31939
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.


F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.


You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.


Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.

My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Weird control freaks with more contempt than ability. Yep, twinsies.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Time zone: America/New_York


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: