Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cuccinell

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
UpstateSCHokie
Posts: 11907
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm

Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cuccinell

Post by UpstateSCHokie »

Face it libs. Cuccinelli 's defeat was not a repudiation of the Tea Party, like you want it to be. I even heard some schmuck on MSNBC say that had Cooch not been outspent by something like 10-1 throughout the campaign, he would have likely won.

BTW, most of those ads were character assassination ads. I thought the so-called "moderates" get turned off by such ads? Also, which candidate kept bringing up social issues? Was it Cuccinelli? Or was it McAuliffe who wanted to manipulate (i.e. scare) some voters into thinking Cuccinelli was waging a war on women?

What saddens me is how many people could not recognize the democrat's 3rd party strategy here. The Clinton machine learned quite well in 1992 and 1996 how a 3rd party candidate can help the democrat candidate win.

So when I hear people say "the fact that Sarvis got 7% of the vote should tell you something about the Republican candidate" what it actually tells me is that the democrats understand how to manipulate a significant portion of the Republican base in a way that helps elect democrats. You can say it was a vote against both parties all day long, but at the end of the day, voting for Sarvis only hurt one party.

=====================
November 7, 2013
Yes, Virginia, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Ken Cuccinelli
By Matthew Vadum

Reagan conservative Ken Cuccinelli lost his bid for the Virginia governorship because the patrician, turf-protecting Republican Party establishment in his state wanted him to lose.

It's really that simple.

Cuccinelli campaign strategist Chris La Civita suggested on election night Tuesday that the federal government's partial shutdown last month may have hurt his candidate in parts of Virginia where many federal employees and contractors live.

He also suggested that Cuccinelli could have won if he had received more money from national GOP sources, which he said dried up as of Oct. 1.
"There are a lot of questions people are going to be asking and that is, was leaving Cuccinelli alone in the first week of October, a smart move?" La Civita said. "We were on our own. Just look at the volume [of ads]."
Cuccinelli lost by a mere 2.5 percentage points in a state that until somewhat recently had been solidly Republican. Even with Cuccinelli's various tactical mistakes (and there were many), it is still very difficult to believe that the GOP machine couldn't have gotten another fifty-odd thousand voters to the polls to support him if it really wanted to.

Predictably, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who won re-election comfortably on Tuesday, refused to lift a finger to help his vulnerable fellow Republican in Virginia. Even with mountains of cash, Christie had no electoral coattails, which is not exactly a resume-builder for a presidential candidate.

This is, of course, the same politician who betrayed GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney on at least two occasions. Christie spent his high-profile speech at the Republican National Convention last year talking about himself instead of Romney. He also won President Obama lots of votes by cozying up to him during the Tropical Storm Sandy saga. But his personal popularity didn't do a thing for the rest of the New Jersey GOP slate this week.

What happened to Cuccinelli wasn't some back-room conspiracy shrouded in smoke and euphemisms; it was a conscious, overt effort to do serious damage to a Tea Party standard-bearer.

Virginia Republicans tend to value hierarchy and tradition. Cuccinelli the upstart was punished for his impertinence. Instead of waiting his turn, as the aristocratic gatekeepers of the Virginia GOP demand, Cuccinelli asked his party elders to value merit and good policy proposals over seniority and rank. The powers that be within the Virginia Republican establishment responded by smearing the archetypal conservative as an extremist and trying to squash him.

Remember that the establishment came out hard four years ago for the now-tainted RINOish governor Bob McDonnell, but this year largely left the cash-strapped Cuccinelli to his own devices against the fabulously wealthy Terry McAuliffe, the Democrats' Daddy Warbucks.

According to the Virginia Public Access Project, key GOP fundraising organs lavished funds in the 2009 election cycle on the ethically slippery McDonnell. The Republican Party of Virginia and the Republican National Committee gave McDonnell $2,704,348 and $2,253,500, respectively.

In the 2013 election cycle, the two big political committees were stingy, according to available data. As of Oct. 23, the Republican Party of Virginia had given Cuccinelli $843,085, and the RNC had coughed up a paltry $85,098 for the gubernatorial candidate. (The Republican Governors' Association was not stingy. RGA gave $1,994,312 to McDonnell, who leaves office in disgrace in January, and a healthy $8,066,772 to Cuccinelli.)

But the Republican National Committee is putting the word out that it did everything it could to help Cuccinelli.

The RNC claims that it spent $3 million on the so-called ground game to help Cuccinelli and the rest of the Republican ticket "while building the party's presence in Virginia." The non-Cuccinelli-specific effort included testing a "new precinct-based voter contact model." The RNC gushed that its "Virginia-based staff included four dedicated to Asian-Pacific American engagement, two for African American engagement, and one for Hispanic engagement."

Radio talk show host Mark Levin says the RNC is trying to "punk" conservatives by trying to "to persuade you that the RNC has been vigorously fighting for Cuccinelli's campaign in Virginia. They think you're so stupid that you'll buy this self-serving BS."

Even if we generously give the RNC the benefit of the doubt and assume it did everything it could to boost Cuccinelli's chances, there is no question that there was heavy institutional resistance among GOP apparatchiks to the mainstream conservative contender's bid.

Cuccinelli's worst enemies were just as likely to be found among Republicans as Democrats. There was no shortage of prominent, important Republicans crossing the aisle to endorse Democrat McAuliffe.

Boyd Marcus, former chief of staff for House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), joined the McAuliffe campaign after the gubernatorial candidacy of his pick, sore loser Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, flamed out. Bolling himself petulantly refused to endorse Cuccinelli and worked hard against him, demoralizing the grassroots and depressing turnout by badmouthing the nominee on conservative talk radio every chance he got.

Other Republicans who endorsed McAuliffe include Dwight Schar, former RNC finance chairman; Judy Ford Wason, a GOP strategist who worked for McDonnell; former state senate president pro tempore John Chichester; state senator Russ Potts; and former House of Delegates members Vince Callahan, Katherine Waddell, and Jim Dillard.

Karl Rove, the corporatist Wile E. Coyote of the political consulting world who nearly lost George W. Bush the presidency not once, but twice, did nothing to help Cuccinelli. That's because the generally useless strategerist and other establishment figures have declared war on the Tea Party.

And virtually no one defended GOP lieutenant governor candidate E.W. Jackson when his Democratic opponent, Ralph Northam, viciously slimed him for his mainstream Christian beliefs. It is a core tenet of Christianity that original sin is responsible for a host of maladies in the world and, unsurprisingly, Jackson, head pastor of a Christian church in Chesapeake, believes in that doctrine.

But Northam ran a disgusting TV ad that amounted to an attack on the very precepts of Christianity itself. Building on Jackson's otherwise unremarkable belief in original sin, Sarelle Holiday, mother of a disabled child, absurdly accused Jackson of considering her son "a punishment." Northam, who is white, is such a class act that he even refused to shake the hand of Jackson, who is black, during a joint public appearance in Hampton Roads.

Even before the polls had closed Tuesday, GOP operatives were already armed with excuses to explain away Cuccinelli's approaching loss. The D.C. echo chamber reverberated with accusations that Cuccinelli was a woman-hating religious kook and an irresponsible loudmouth.

One said a "fire-breathing conservative turned populist unable to defend his positions on birth control" and women's issues was doomed to lose. The RNC, in his view, was right to save its money for "races they can actually win." Of course, a race decided by a mere 2.5 percentage points is pretty well winnable by definition.

With Cuccinelli's totally avoidable loss, Terry McAuliffe, whose lifelong profession is Clinton operative, will be in position to secure Virginia for his puppet-mistress, Alinskyite neo-Marxist Hillary Clinton, in the 2016 presidential election.

McAuliffe is now a safe bet to take over the Democratic Governors Association and the National Governors Association. Both perches will give him even more access to high-dollar donors than he has now.

Cuccinelli's humiliation at the polls gives plenty of ammo to left-wingers. The media is already saying Tuesday's election results show that voters have repudiated the Tea Party.

This is abject nonsense. Cuccinelli was able to almost close a huge gap in the polls with McAuliffe only by campaigning hard in the final days on the monstrosity that is ObamaCare and linking the hated wealth- and health-redistribution program to his opponent.

Also on Tuesday in Mobile, Alabama, a relative nobody, a Tea Party guy named Dean Young, with no money and no big fancy political machine behind him, scored an impressive 47 percent of the vote in a GOP primary runoff against Bradley Byrne, the well-funded choice of big business, who will almost certainly win the general election in the ultra-safe Republican congressional seat.

Of course, the fact that a Tea Party activist came out of nowhere to almost score an upset against a pillar of the Republican Party establishment is nowhere to be found in the New York Times article about the election.

The narrative is always more important than the truth.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ ... z2jxak8ak0
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Image

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by awesome guy »

Bill Bolling can kiss my rear
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by 133743Hokie »

A key point of this article is Cuccinelli's not waiting his turn. Bolling was supposed to ascend from Lt Gov to Gov and Cuccinelli was supposed to ascend from AG to Lt Gov, then rise to Gov 4 years from now. He dared to cut in line. Those that don't know the history and tradition of VA politics have no idea how big of an issue this was among the political establishment of the GOP. They are bitter and petulant and skewered him for it. They would have rather lost a race than let some upstart break with their self proclaimed tradition. To me that's the biggest takeaway from the election
VoiceOfReason
Posts: 2182
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:21 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Every chance I get

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by VoiceOfReason »

If the GOP money men refuse to support a TP candidate, how is that not a repudiation of the TP?

Keep in mind... TMC is hardly a shining example of a great D candidate.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by awesome guy »

VoiceOfReason wrote:If the GOP money men refuse to support a TP candidate, how is that not a repudiation of the TP?

Keep in mind... TMC is hardly a shining example of a great D candidate.
GOP Establishment, not necessarily money men. Cuccinell raised money comparable to McDonnel. But Mcaulif is the guy who sold the Lincoln bedroom during the Clinton years, so he knows how to extort even more from his guys. It cost him twice what Cuccinell raised, so just wait as all those favors are paid back.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
UpstateSCHokie
Posts: 11907
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by UpstateSCHokie »

Huh? I am talking about repudiation by the voters. The GOP establishment does not get to decide what candidates the voters like.

And you need to keep in mind that TMC had a gazillion more dollars to spend than Cooch had. And almost all of that money went to negative attack ads aimed at defining Cooch as a SoCon extremist, which apparently worked on a lot of low info types - especially single women.

But in any event, the GOP had a chance to win a governor's race and it decided it would rather lose than fund someone they saw as a TP candidate. Yet its the establishment that constantly tells the rest of us that its the TP that would rather have "ideological purity than win a race." Hypocrisy much.
VoiceOfReason wrote:If the GOP money men refuse to support a TP candidate, how is that not a repudiation of the TP?

Keep in mind... TMC is hardly a shining example of a great D candidate.
Image

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by awesome guy »

UpstateSCHokie wrote:Huh? I am talking about repudiation by the voters. The GOP establishment does not get to decide what candidates the voters like.

And you need to keep in mind that TMC had a gazillion more dollars to spend than Cooch had. And almost all of that money went to negative attack ads aimed at defining Cooch as a SoCon extremist, which apparently worked on a lot of low info types - especially single women.

But in any event, the GOP had a chance to win a governor's race and it decided it would rather lose than fund someone they saw as a TP candidate. Yet its the establishment that constantly tells the rest of us that its the TP that would rather have "ideological purity than win a race." Hypocrisy much.
VoiceOfReason wrote:If the GOP money men refuse to support a TP candidate, how is that not a repudiation of the TP?

Keep in mind... TMC is hardly a shining example of a great D candidate.
Today Rush was saying the establishment traded the GOP giving up on Cuccinell in exchange for the DNC giving up on Buono.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
VoiceOfReason
Posts: 2182
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:21 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Every chance I get

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by VoiceOfReason »

awesome guy wrote: Today Rush was saying the establishment traded the GOP giving up on Cuccinell in exchange for the DNC giving up on Buono.
Buono never had a shot. Not enough money in the world to beat the second coming of Christ(ie)
User avatar
RWNJ
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:52 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Independent

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by RWNJ »

He also claimed the unmarried women overwhelmingly voted for McAuliffe and that was the reason for his victory. Seems the unmarried women wanted their free shise.
awesome guy wrote:
UpstateSCHokie wrote:Huh? I am talking about repudiation by the voters. The GOP establishment does not get to decide what candidates the voters like.

And you need to keep in mind that TMC had a gazillion more dollars to spend than Cooch had. And almost all of that money went to negative attack ads aimed at defining Cooch as a SoCon extremist, which apparently worked on a lot of low info types - especially single women.

But in any event, the GOP had a chance to win a governor's race and it decided it would rather lose than fund someone they saw as a TP candidate. Yet its the establishment that constantly tells the rest of us that its the TP that would rather have "ideological purity than win a race." Hypocrisy much.
VoiceOfReason wrote:If the GOP money men refuse to support a TP candidate, how is that not a repudiation of the TP?

Keep in mind... TMC is hardly a shining example of a great D candidate.
Today Rush was saying the establishment traded the GOP giving up on Cuccinell in exchange for the DNC giving up on Buono.
We lived through Obama, you'll live through Trump
VoiceOfReason
Posts: 2182
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:21 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Every chance I get

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by VoiceOfReason »

RWNJ wrote:He also claimed the unmarried women overwhelmingly voted for McAuliffe and that was the reason for his victory. Seems the unmarried women wanted their free shise.
More likely the unmarried women would prefer the government stay out of their reproductive decisions. For example... that "creepy Uncle Sam" commercial the Koch Bro's put together to mock O-Care... instead it reminds me much more about the VA Legislature's ultrasound legislation. And if I thought that way... imagine people with an active uterus :mrgreen:
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Yes, Va, the GOP Establishment did stick a shiv in Cucci

Post by 133743Hokie »

VoiceOfReason wrote:
RWNJ wrote:He also claimed the unmarried women overwhelmingly voted for McAuliffe and that was the reason for his victory. Seems the unmarried women wanted their free shise.
More likely the unmarried women would prefer the government stay out of their reproductive decisions. For example... that "creepy Uncle Sam" commercial the Koch Bro's put together to mock O-Care... instead it reminds me much more about the VA Legislature's ultrasound legislation. And if I thought that way... imagine people with an active uterus :mrgreen:
Yep, because we all know that abortion is unsettled legislation and still up for debate in all the states and across the federal government. As Oakton would say, LIV.
Post Reply