Powell, Rice aides received classified emails

[nolanvt]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

[awesome guy]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

Powell also said that he "did not use my email account for any classified matters because I had a classified computer on my desk."

They "you did it too!" defense works on 8 year olds. Not shocked you're falling for it.

[nolanvt]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

Powell also said that he "did not use my email account for any classified matters because I had a classified computer on my desk."

They "you did it too!" defense works on 8 year olds. Not shocked you're falling for it.

What am I falling for?

[Major Kong]

I thought this was already known last year

[awesome guy]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

Powell also said that he "did not use my email account for any classified matters because I had a classified computer on my desk."

They "you did it too!" defense works on 8 year olds. Not shocked you're falling for it.

What am I falling for?

The "fffft, ffft, ffft" running from gwaker and out of breath "Powell and Rice did it to!" post.

[awesome guy]

I thought this was already known last year

This means charges are coming and the Clintons have no defense.

[RiverguyVT]

No matter what the issue at hand, I always feel a lot better after Elijah Cummings weighs in.

[Hokie5150]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

Federal regulations regarding such has changed since then:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fac ... gulations/

Jan. 21, 2009: The Senate confirms Clinton as secretary of state.

Oct. 2, 2009: The U.S. Code of federal regulations on handling electronic records is updated: “Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system.” The responsibility for making and preserving the records is assigned to “the head of each federal agency.”

[Homebrew]

So wait, nolanvt jumped to a conclusion- parroting dem talking points- and was proven wrong, again?

[nolanvt]

So wait, nolanvt jumped to a conclusion- parroting dem talking points- and was proven wrong, again?

What conclusion did I jump to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Attila T Hun]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

[PolyTech]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

[nolanvt]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

Way to dodge my question. What conclusion did I draw?

[nolanvt]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

Go on...

[UpstateSCHokie]

So wait, nolanvt jumped to a conclusion- parroting dem talking points- and was proven wrong, again?

What conclusion did I jump to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh please. This story has been circulating on liberal websites and is being used to down-play/excuse Hillary's email scandal. I don't think its a stretch for someone to think that you are doing the same thing by posting the story here.

[awesome guy]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

Go on...

Go on. It's hard to figure out.

[USN_Hokie]

on private servers.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/268 ... -emails-on

Retroactively classified. This is the state department trying to throw mud at everyone as a distraction and you're falling for it.

[USN_Hokie]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

That's good...and very appropriate.

[RiverguyVT]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

Way to dodge my question. What conclusion did I draw?

Your conclusion (and that of the entire left spectrum- MSNBC, Mika, Huffington, Madcow, et al) is that it is okay for Hillary!-> to have done something so long as a prior Executive office holder had done it, regardless whether laws had changed in the interim. For example. Jefferson, a president, owned slaves. So it is okay if Hillary!-> buys a few underage indonesian concubines* for Bill to own and play with. AmIRight?




*You know, like his buddy that abuses boys

[awesome guy]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

That's good...and very appropriate.

Yep, I'm stealing it. TrollinVT

[nolanvt]

So wait, nolanvt jumped to a conclusion- parroting dem talking points- and was proven wrong, again?

What conclusion did I jump to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh please. This story has been circulating on liberal websites and is being used to down-play/excuse Hillary's email scandal. I don't think its a stretch for someone to think that you are doing the same thing by posting the story here.

I'm excusing/downplaying Hillary's indiscretions? The answer is I'm not and think she should be held accountable, but continue on.

[nolanvt]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

Way to dodge my question. What conclusion did I draw?

Your conclusion (and that of the entire left spectrum- MSNBC, Mika, Huffington, Madcow, et al) is that it is okay for Hillary!-> to have done something so long as a prior Executive office holder had done it, regardless whether laws had changed in the interim. For example. Jefferson, a president, owned slaves. So it is okay if Hillary!-> buys a few underage indonesian concubines* for Bill to own and play with. AmIRight?




*You know, like his buddy that abuses boys

Point me to the post where I said what Hillary did was okay. I don't expect a retraction when you can't find it.

[nolanvt]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

I think everyone knows what Trollin'VT's purpose was.

I like it!

[RiverguyVT]

Uh, purpose of your original post was?

Way to dodge my question. What conclusion did I draw?

Your conclusion (and that of the entire left spectrum- MSNBC, Mika, Huffington, Madcow, et al) is that it is okay for Hillary!-> to have done something so long as a prior Executive office holder had done it, regardless whether laws had changed in the interim. For example. Jefferson, a president, owned slaves. So it is okay if Hillary!-> buys a few underage indonesian concubines* for Bill to own and play with. AmIRight?




*You know, like his buddy that abuses boys

Point me to the post where I said what Hillary did was okay. I don't expect a retraction when you can't find it.

Okay. I'll fix it:
The conclusion of the entire left spectrum- MSNBC, Mika, Huffington, Madcow, et al is that it is okay for Hillary!-> to have done something so long as a prior Executive office holder had done it, regardless whether laws had changed in the interim. For example. Jefferson, a president, owned slaves. So it is okay if Hillary!-> buys a few underage indonesian concubines* for Bill to own and play with. AmIRight?

I'll leave it vague whether you belong within that group.

[Hokie CPA]