United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:13 am

Time zone: America/New_York [ DST ]


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 176 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald ... 1787545407

Donations to Mountain Stage, West Virginia public radio can be made at the site linked below for your convenience:

https://secure.wvpublic.org/donate/

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 17475
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
Low info fodder.

_________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Good luck

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
ip_law-hokie wrote:
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald-trump-on-getting-women-grab-them-by-the-pussy-1787545407

Donations to Mountain Stage, West Virginia public radio can be made at the site linked below for your convenience:

https://secure.wvpublic.org/donate/


LOL. He really has no control over his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Atta boy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:21 pm
Posts: 2215
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Voter Apathy
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...

_________________
Forum rules: Please be civil.
"You do suck and are a terrible human being." - awesome guy
"maybe because you're autistic" - USN_Hokie
Seriously... there's only ONE rule.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:

"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."

This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:

"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."

This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?


So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:

"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."

This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?


So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?


Not sure. But you would NOT be a LIV.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8155
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
Seems about right.

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8155
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:

"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."

This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?


So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?


Obviously!

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
nolanvt wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:

"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."

This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?


So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?


Obviously!


We are #blessed that these intellectuals grace us with their presence (and donations to WV public radio).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
absolutvt03 wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...



Somewhere, God is busy shortening his list of future roommates based on people voting for Trump. I mean, if you support Trump, you obviously support adultery, and hate monogamy and marriage.


Last edited by HokieFanDC on Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8155
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
ip_law-hokie wrote:

We are #blessed that these intellectuals grace us with their presence (and donations to WV public radio).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Have you worked on your speech for when you accept the Fundraiser of the Year award?

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 17475
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
absolutvt03 wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...


Low info is not reading the link to see this was from over a decade ago when he was running for....no office at all.

_________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8155
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
USN_Hokie wrote:
absolutvt03 wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...


Low info is not reading the link to see this was from over a decade ago when he was running for....no office at all.


No, we read it.

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 17475
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.

_________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.


Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 17475
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.


Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right

Edit: Ok, I just watched the video(hot mic). I must have misread the the quotes; I thought he was quoted as saying "but she's married." Sounds like he was hitting on a married woman, which is not cool.

_________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


Last edited by USN_Hokie on Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.


Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right


Right on cue. Atta boy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 17475
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.


Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right

Atta boy!

Well, if Hillary was looking for a way to make Trump talk about her husband's infidelity and rape accusations, this was it. Should be fun on Sunday (Westworld better still be on).
Right on cue.

_________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 7861
Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.[/quote]

You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.[/quote]

Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right[/quote]
Atta boy![/quote]
Well, if Hillary was looking for a way to make Trump talk about her husband's infidelity and rape accusations, this was it. Should be fun on Sunday (Westworld better still be on).
Right on cue.[/quote]

Uh uh. You guys always deflect back to Hillary. Which might matter to me if i was voting for Hillary.
Gary Johnson and Evan McMullin are both better people than these two. Most people are. I'm also considering a wrtie in vote, which is still better than those two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 8481
Location: New York, NY
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info fodder.


Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.


You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.


Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right


Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: uh oh
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8155
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
HokieFanDC wrote:
Uh uh. You guys always deflect back to Hillary. Which might matter to me if i was voting for Hillary.
Gary Johnson and Evan McMullin are both better people than these two. Most people are. I'm also considering a wrtie in vote, which is still better than those two.


Yup. I mean...if USN wants me to, I could vote for Hillary if he'd like, but both of these clowns are unacceptable.

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 176 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Time zone: America/New_York [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Color scheme by ColorizeIt!