United We Stand - uwsboard.com

At first, this seems laughably low and something out of Chicago or a Banana Republic with a great acceptance of corruption. But it's a poll of everyone. If I were asked this question then I would be part of the 66% because there was a 0% chance I voted for Hillary before so it's not possible to be less likely to vote for her. I'm sure that's the same for like 40% of the people surveyed. Would be interesting to see this against just people that were leaning or likely to vote for Hillary.

I feel sorry for Nolan. You know he's gambled on this election and was doubled and tripled down on a Clinton win. Likely even took lines on the electoral college numbers and final popular vote. It's going to be an expensive lesson in politics. Same with IP who is going to be the NRA contributor of the year, though he can afford his hobby.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10 ... tions.html

What is IP's commitment at this point if Hillary loses? If it's over $1K he could be a life member.

He's contributing $200 in my name. Not sure how much additional exposure he has. I think he can afford that type of bet. But poor Nolan, he's going to be eating hand sandwiches for a while.

USN_Hokie wrote:What is IP's commitment at this point if Hillary loses? If it's over $1K he could be a life member.

Poll I saw last night said the latest email news shifted the less likely number up about 2% for democrats. Not a lot of movement

Didn't everyone with a pulse already know that Clinton was corrupt and a liar?

If they didn't care before then I find it hard to believe this will move the needle.

FireFuente wrote:Didn't everyone with a pulse already know that Clinton was corrupt and a liar?

If they didn't care before then I find it hard to believe this will move the needle.

Because she's under investigation and a constitutional crisis in the making.