Should Mixon have exercised his 2A rights and shot her then?[/quote]CWHOKIECPA wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:Destroying her face was obviously an appropriate level of force against this "threat".ip_law-hokie wrote:wow, hell of a leap Nolan even for you. Nobody ever said to start a fight with a woman or hit a woman, we said that A HUMAN HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES, she initiated the physical contact he defended himself and he got charged, that is wrong IMO. So I guess in your world if you stop your car and somebody runs into the back of your car you are at fault, you stopped after all.
You should know by now to not poke bears unless you're ready for the consequences.
not a smart move as she had no weapon so by the letter of the law he would be charged with a crime for that. he was in a physical altercation SHE INITIATED, was not aware fights are scripted but I guess you think he knew what she was going to do while attacking him and made sure his response caused no damage[/quote]
Is destroying someone's face who is physically inferior to you an appropriate use of force? Or, would you have advised him to behave like a normal person and push her away and then walk away?[/quote]
so fights are scripted, got it. so he takes your advice and pushes her away, now she assaulted him first with a slap/punch to his head, he did nothing, she then puts her hands on his neck it appears or upper body and it appears is still swinging, he pushes her, in your script does she grab his arms or keep coming at him? or does your script play out a different way. He extracted himself from an assualt, EVERY HUMAN has that right[/quote]
Only in UWS full retard mode (courtesy of CFBApologist) is a fight between a world class athlete/running back and a 140 lb woman deemed a fair and contested match. Carry on.[/quote]
It's simple. Women are scary. That's all you need to know. They have scared CW so much, he avoids them. And they scare other posters so much, they fear for their lives when a woman slaps them.[/quote]
No. The system you promote is scary. It's a system where you clearly believe women should be allowed to assault men without consequences. This sort of attitude carries over into family courts, where women are always victims and men always perpetrators.[/quote]
No I don't support that. I support a world where an altercation between a strong athlete and a weaker woman, doesn't go from slapping to a broken face in less than 3 seconds. You're overthinking the whole thing because you have a strange fascination with the male-female relationship.