Obama wiretapped Trump Tower

[awesome guy]

You losers are going to be pissed about Obama being indicted.

You think Obama's going to be indicted?

We know logic and reason aren't your thing, but this is retarded, even for you.

I'll take a wager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Always Gutless is too big of a pussy. Already tried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

[USN_Hokie]

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.

The possibility of your favorite politician being exposed publicly as a criminal has really brought out the worst in you guys.

First your corrupt post-menopausal racketeering candidate loses, now mom jeans is being exposed. The last few months have been rough for you guys.

[ip_law-hokie]

You think Obama's going to be indicted?

We know logic and reason aren't your thing, but this is retarded, even for you.

I'll take a wager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Always Gutless is too big of a pussy. Already tried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

Pu say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

We know logic and reason aren't your thing, but this is retarded, even for you.

I'll take a wager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Always Gutless is too big of a pussy. Already tried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

Pu say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I took your money.

[133743Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

[ip_law-hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ip_law-hokie]

I'll take a wager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Always Gutless is too big of a pussy. Already tried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

Pu say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I took your money.

Take some more, or just be all talk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Always Gutless is too big of a pussy. Already tried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

Pu say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I took your money.

Take some more, or just be all talk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Diggety already proved himself a excrement talker that backs out.

[ip_law-hokie]

These snowflakes can put their money [emoji383] where their mouth is, or be feminine wine sipper pussies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Idiot

Pu say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I took your money.

Take some more, or just be all talk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Diggety already proved himself a excrement talker that backs out.

[emoji213][emoji213]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[USN_Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Congratulations, you've now reached full 'nutter status in addition to being a Hillary voter. Sad.

[133743Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

[USN_Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Yep. Obama and the Democrats were listening to everything and everyone. If Trump took a dump and only wiped once we would have heard all about it by now.

They have nothing. At first I thought it was a campaign to undermine Trump's presidency...now I wonder if there's a chance that it's a cover/defense for illegal activity.

[HooFighter]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

[HokieHam]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

O proof of colluding......loser.

[HokieHam]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Where is your link to the otherwise? Where is there proof that the Russians "hacked" the election?

The 80's called and they want their foreign policy back......oh, and 0blahblah even said it didn't effect the outcome.....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/w ... unt-231849

[HokieJoe]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Even assuming what you're saying is true, on what planet is 'colluding with a former cold war enemy' worse than taking it up the tailpipe from Putin as he waltzed right into Crimea and Syria? And I notice that none of the usuals here on UWS or in DC are saying one word about the shiite the Chinese have pulled...Again, on former President F-head's watch. So excuse me if I'm having a hard time believing that you, Ben Rhodes and Hoofighter are suddenly flag waving Muricans.

[USN_Hokie]

This is a pretty thorough review of the facts and possibilities as we know of them:

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/yes-oba ... veillance/

[HooFighter]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Where is your link to the otherwise? Where is there proof that the Russians "hacked" the election?

The 80's called and they want their foreign policy back......oh, and 0blahblah even said it didn't effect the outcome.....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/w ... unt-231849

You made a bunch of bullshit claims about what the FBI said. When I asked you to back it up you said to prove it otherwise and produced an article about the White House saying no one physically hacked a machine on Election Day (which I agree with). The FBI is still investigating and you know it, so stop making excrement up.

All you can do is change the subject and call someone names. Try harder.

[USN_Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Where is your link to the otherwise? Where is there proof that the Russians "hacked" the election?

The 80's called and they want their foreign policy back......oh, and 0blahblah even said it didn't effect the outcome.....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/w ... unt-231849

You made a bunch of bullshit claims about what the FBI said. When I asked you to back it up you said to prove it otherwise and produced an article about the White House saying no one physically hacked a machine on Election Day (which I agree with). The FBI is still investigating and you know it, so stop making excrement up.

All you can do is change the subject and call someone names. Try harder.

Zero evidence of any improper contact. You know this, stop playing stupid. Feel free to google, it's been reported extensively

[awesome guy]

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Where is your link to the otherwise? Where is there proof that the Russians "hacked" the election?

The 80's called and they want their foreign policy back......oh, and 0blahblah even said it didn't effect the outcome.....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/w ... unt-231849

You made a bunch of bullshit claims about what the FBI said. When I asked you to back it up you said to prove it otherwise and produced an article about the White House saying no one physically hacked a machine on Election Day (which I agree with). The FBI is still investigating and you know it, so stop making excrement up.

All you can do is change the subject and call someone names. Try harder.

Zero evidence of any improper contact. You know this, stop playing stupid. Feel free to google, it's been reported extensively

He's not playing. Stupidity is a path to liberalism.

[USN_Hokie]

I take that back. There is some evidence of collusion:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderi ... ba4aa3991a

[Major Kong]

Tell Putin I'll have more flexibility after the election...that sounds like collusion to me.

[HokieHam]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Where is your link to the otherwise? Where is there proof that the Russians "hacked" the election?

The 80's called and they want their foreign policy back......oh, and 0blahblah even said it didn't effect the outcome.....

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/w ... unt-231849

You made a bunch of bullshit claims about what the FBI said. When I asked you to back it up you said to prove it otherwise and produced an article about the White House saying no one physically hacked a machine on Election Day (which I agree with). The FBI is still investigating and you know it, so stop making excrement up.

All you can do is change the subject and call someone names. Try harder.

Uhh.....check who said what in this thread......try harder.

[ip_law-hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Nope.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[133743Hokie]

I P, why such a snarky Dick all the time getting in these purse fights with AG and others? Anything to contribute on the actual topic of the thread?

Don't collude with Cold War adversaries to rig an election and expect your phones not to be tapped.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FBI investigation says no collusion.

FBI investigation says Russia attempted to hack BOTH parties for the purpose of destabilizing election and giving US a black eye.

FBI says no evidence Russian melding had any influence on the election.

FBI says no evidence Russia preferred a Trump win.

So no collusion and no rigging. So again, why would the administration get a FISA warrant to tap Trump people just weeks before the election?

Do you have a link for any of these conclusions? Which FBI report do you speak of?

Here's one. There are many versions out there from a variety of media outlets. This is the first one I came to.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/p ... .html?_r=0

And another...

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-fbi- ... -campaign/