United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Resume enhancer for the left.

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

I think it's times like this that people should re-consider reading the gatewaypundit. This is at least the 3rd pile of crap posted on UWS this week from the pundit.

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

I think it's times like this that people should re-consider reading the gatewaypundit. This is at least the 3rd pile of crap posted on UWS this week from the pundit.

silly necks.

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

I think it's times like this that people should re-consider reading the gatewaypundit. This is at least the 3rd pile of crap posted on UWS this week from the pundit.

Actually, I believe you apologized and retracted your accusation in the last thread if I recall correctly. But yeah, their headline is misleading...story and mugshot are funny, which is why I posted.

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

I think it's times like this that people should re-consider reading the gatewaypundit. This is at least the 3rd pile of crap posted on UWS this week from the pundit.

Actually, I believe you apologized and retracted your accusation in the last thread if I recall correctly. But yeah, their headline is misleading...story and mugshot are funny, which is why I posted.

That's a fake post. I have no recollection of that occurring.

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... e-officer/

Probably because the guy lost the election last November and is currently running for anything.


Just saying.

It's times like this when we should remind ourselves that Cap'n is an ideologue, but he most definitely is not partisan.

I think it's times like this that people should re-consider reading the gatewaypundit. This is at least the 3rd pile of crap posted on UWS this week from the pundit.

Actually, I believe you apologized and retracted your accusation in the last thread if I recall correctly. But yeah, their headline is misleading...story and mugshot are funny, which is why I posted.

That's a fake post. I have no recollection of that occurring.

Oh yeah, I didn't recollect that, because I didn't.

"Fair enough. I'll revise it to say that oakton and Trump's re-wording are either ignorant or disingenuous.
Gateway and Daily Mail only somewhat disingenuous for implying that he is OK with terrorist attacks, which is exactly opposite of his quote that says everyone needs to work together to stop them."