US Soccer shoves Gay in everyone's faces

[HvilleHokie]

Snowflake alert!!

[nolanvt]

Snowflake alert!!

+1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Snowflake alert!!

+1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300] [emoji300]

[RWNJ]

Meh.

It's Pride Week. This is no different than the NFL wearing pink during Titty Cancer Month.

1. Breast Cancer is a horrible disease, not a sexual preference or lifestyle. Breast cancer affects men, women, blacks, whites, asians, etc. Its not a social agenda, its a medical research agenda that saves lives.

2. This is not the "Baltimore Ravens" wearing pink shoes..this is the US National Soccer team celebrating and endorsing the gay lifestyle and sexual preference of roughly 2% of the population. Its a left wing social agenda statement. It's political. It's wrong

Seems like a lot more than 2% if you are a fan of game shows and the like. Nearly every day one of the contestants is gay. Be it Survivor, Wheel of Fortune, Who wants to be a millionaire, etc. Considering the low number of contestants, they must make their selection of them based on sexual preference. Or is it just Hollywood putting their agenda out there in your face? JMHO

[FireFuente]

Well...soccer is gay.

So I don't really see the problem.

[HokieJoe]

Because it's Pride Week. Like I said before, it's really no different than the NFL wearing pink for breast cancer awareness. You might think it's different, but at the end of the day, it really isn't.

Not to mention half the dadgum team is openly gay, but that shouldn't matter, right?

Breast Cancer is a political, sexual, social agenda? Interesting.

No, but then, neither is being gay. Admittedly, some gay people HAVE an agenda, but so do you. So you can't apply the facts about a minority within a group across the group as a whole.

The bottom line is there are numerous conditions which have been assigned an Awareness Week during the year. This week it's the gays' turn. Leave 'em alone and it'll be over before you know it.

Being gay IS a sexual preference.. are you arguing its not?

I don't believe it is. You have these awkward, effeminate males who are teased relentlessly through middle school and they are going to grow up and CHOOSE to be persecuted their entire lives by deciding they'd rather suck dick? I just can't buy it. They have to be born gay. On this, you and I will simply have to agree to disagree, cuz there's so much more evidence to it being inherent rather than chosen... I'm just never going to see it any other way.

Believe what you will, but there is no conclusive evidence that all homosexuals are born homosexual. On the contrary, the evidence indicates that some are born and some are made.

[HokieJoe]

Meh.

It's Pride Week. This is no different than the NFL wearing pink during Titty Cancer Month.

1. Breast Cancer is a horrible disease, not a sexual preference or lifestyle. Breast cancer affects men, women, blacks, whites, asians, etc. Its not a social agenda, its a medical research agenda that saves lives.

2. This is not the "Baltimore Ravens" wearing pink shoes..this is the US National Soccer team celebrating and endorsing the gay lifestyle and sexual preference of roughly 2% of the population. Its a left wing social agenda statement. It's political. It's wrong

Seems like a lot more than 2% if you are a fan of game shows and the like. Nearly every day one of the contestants is gay. Be it Survivor, Wheel of Fortune, Who wants to be a millionaire, etc. Considering the low number of contestants, they must make their selection of them based on sexual preference. Or is it just Hollywood putting their agenda out there in your face? JMHO

There is little doubt that it's social engineering.

[fatman]

I'm guessing >> 2% of the uswnt are homosexual.

[cwtcr hokie]

I'm guessing >> 2% of the uswnt are homosexual.

homophobe

[RiverguyVT]

Well...soccer is gay.

So I don't really see the problem.

Fire just won the thread.

[nolanvt]

Meh.

It's Pride Week. This is no different than the NFL wearing pink during Titty Cancer Month.

1. Breast Cancer is a horrible disease, not a sexual preference or lifestyle. Breast cancer affects men, women, blacks, whites, asians, etc. Its not a social agenda, its a medical research agenda that saves lives.

2. This is not the "Baltimore Ravens" wearing pink shoes..this is the US National Soccer team celebrating and endorsing the gay lifestyle and sexual preference of roughly 2% of the population. Its a left wing social agenda statement. It's political. It's wrong

Seems like a lot more than 2% if you are a fan of game shows and the like. Nearly every day one of the contestants is gay. Be it Survivor, Wheel of Fortune, Who wants to be a millionaire, etc. Considering the low number of contestants, they must make their selection of them based on sexual preference. Or is it just Hollywood putting their agenda out there in your face? JMHO

Nothing is getting thrown in your face you don't want thrown in your face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Florida Hokie]

Ladies and Gentleman, the difference between "tolerance" and "you MUST celebrate" a lifestyle... that didn't take long

http://www.outsports.com/2017/6/8/15761 ... ide-jersey

I knew that in the US soccer viewership wasn't strong - particularly for womens soccer. I didn't realize they now have implemented a policy that forced you to watch it. They missed my house - thank goodness!

As a supposed graduate of a top 75 college, your ability to miss the point of a conversation is amazing. It really is.

No. I get it. You think that US Women's soccer wearing a gay rights friendly jersey is SHOVING GAY IN EVERYONE'S FACE which would require that everyone watch US Women's soccer, which very few people actually do. Additionally, of those that do, a much larger portion of that audience is likely aligned with the notion when compared to the general US population.

In other words you are wrong as usual. If you don't want it in your face. Don't watch it - which probably changes absolutely nothing about your normal viewing habits. Just because you are offended by it doesn't mean they are SHOVING IT IN EVERYONE'S FACE!

[HokieFanDC]

I'm guessing >> 2% of the uswnt are homosexual.

Meh, I only see 1 gay pride avatar and 1 other gay friendly avatar. That's probably 2%, maybe a little higher.

[USN_Hokie]

I think the message in this thread is that soccer is a crap sport played and watched by trash folks by nature of the fact that the rules don't require anything more than kicking a ball on a flat surface past a boundary.

[HokieJoe]

I think the message in this thread is that soccer is a crap sport played and watched by trash folks by nature of the fact that the rules don't require anything more than kicking a ball on a flat surface past a boundary.

It's a 3rd world ghetto sport.

[awesome guy]

Ladies and Gentleman, the difference between "tolerance" and "you MUST celebrate" a lifestyle... that didn't take long

http://www.outsports.com/2017/6/8/15761 ... ide-jersey

I knew that in the US soccer viewership wasn't strong - particularly for womens soccer. I didn't realize they now have implemented a policy that forced you to watch it. They missed my house - thank goodness!

As a supposed graduate of a top 75 college, your ability to miss the point of a conversation is amazing. It really is.

No. I get it. You think that US Women's soccer wearing a gay rights friendly jersey is SHOVING GAY IN EVERYONE'S FACE which would require that everyone watch US Women's soccer, which very few people actually do. Additionally, of those that do, a much larger portion of that audience is likely aligned with the notion when compared to the general US population.

In other words you are wrong as usual. If you don't want it in your face. Don't watch it - which probably changes absolutely nothing about your normal viewing habits. Just because you are offended by it doesn't mean they are SHOVING IT IN EVERYONE'S FACE!

The menstrual flo

[nolanvt]

I think the message in this thread is that soccer is a crap sport played and watched by trash folks by nature of the fact that the rules don't require anything more than kicking a ball on a flat surface past a boundary.

It's a 3rd world ghetto sport.

How does a "ghetto sport" afford to pay Ronaldo, Messi, and others what they do?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CFB Apologist]

Ladies and Gentleman, the difference between "tolerance" and "you MUST celebrate" a lifestyle... that didn't take long

http://www.outsports.com/2017/6/8/15761 ... ide-jersey

I knew that in the US soccer viewership wasn't strong - particularly for womens soccer. I didn't realize they now have implemented a policy that forced you to watch it. They missed my house - thank goodness!

As a supposed graduate of a top 75 college, your ability to miss the point of a conversation is amazing. It really is.

No. I get it. You think that US Women's soccer wearing a gay rights friendly jersey is SHOVING GAY IN EVERYONE'S FACE which would require that everyone watch US Women's soccer, which very few people actually do. Additionally, of those that do, a much larger portion of that audience is likely aligned with the notion when compared to the general US population.

In other words you are wrong as usual. If you don't want it in your face. Don't watch it - which probably changes absolutely nothing about your normal viewing habits. Just because you are offended by it doesn't mean they are SHOVING IT IN EVERYONE'S FACE!

You don't get it.. At all.. your moronic point is "don't watch".. and "hetero's don't watch women's soccer anyway".. like always, you miss or fail to address the underlying and main point that the US national team is endorsing a sexual lifestyle by altering their uniforms- which should not be sexual in the first place. It's a political statement. It's an agenda.. "don't look at the jersey" is your typical second grade off topic argument. Virginia Tech football putting a Confederate flag decal on the helmet to honor fallen Virginia Confederate soldiers would be fine with you? Of course it would ..because in second grade argument land.. "nobody is forcing you to watch Virginia tech football"

[CFB Apologist]

I think the message in this thread is that soccer is a crap sport played and watched by trash folks by nature of the fact that the rules don't require anything more than kicking a ball on a flat surface past a boundary.

It's a 3rd world ghetto sport.

How does a "ghetto sport" afford to pay Ronaldo, Messi, and others what they do?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Like 75% of major college athletic departments..they operate in the red, borrow money, and charge unsustainable television rights fee's. Doesn't change the fact that goons in europe are fenced off from civilized fans, and south american soccer is more corrupt and unsafe for fans than East Baltimore...

[awesome guy]

Ladies and Gentleman, the difference between "tolerance" and "you MUST celebrate" a lifestyle... that didn't take long

http://www.outsports.com/2017/6/8/15761 ... ide-jersey

I knew that in the US soccer viewership wasn't strong - particularly for womens soccer. I didn't realize they now have implemented a policy that forced you to watch it. They missed my house - thank goodness!

As a supposed graduate of a top 75 college, your ability to miss the point of a conversation is amazing. It really is.

No. I get it. You think that US Women's soccer wearing a gay rights friendly jersey is SHOVING GAY IN EVERYONE'S FACE which would require that everyone watch US Women's soccer, which very few people actually do. Additionally, of those that do, a much larger portion of that audience is likely aligned with the notion when compared to the general US population.

In other words you are wrong as usual. If you don't want it in your face. Don't watch it - which probably changes absolutely nothing about your normal viewing habits. Just because you are offended by it doesn't mean they are SHOVING IT IN EVERYONE'S FACE!

You don't get it.. At all.. your moronic point is "don't watch".. and "hetero's don't watch women's soccer anyway".. like always, you miss or fail to address the underlying and main point that the US national team is endorsing a sexual lifestyle by altering their uniforms- which should not be sexual in the first place. It's a political statement. It's an agenda.. "don't look at the jersey" is your typical second grade off topic argument. Virginia Tech football putting a Confederate flag decal on the helmet to honor fallen Virginia Confederate soldiers would be fine with you? Of course it would ..because in second grade argument land.. "nobody is forcing you to watch Virginia tech football"

Burn. Great post, he's here just to spread hate.

[HooFighter]

What's really funny is how all the capitalists here are having a temper tantrum over a marketing/business decision.

[CFB Apologist]

What's really funny is how all the capitalists here are having a temper tantrum over a marketing/business decision.

What's much more hilarious is that you think it was a business decision.. lol

[HooFighter]

What's really funny is how all the capitalists here are having a temper tantrum over a marketing/business decision.

What's much more hilarious is that you think it was a business decision.. lol

[CFB Apologist]

What's really funny is how all the capitalists here are having a temper tantrum over a marketing/business decision.

What's much more hilarious is that you think it was a business decision.. lol

1. The geniuses on here tell me "nobody watches women's soccer"..

2. In my humble opinion, given #1 and the fact that 98% of the country is hetero..I doubt those sales will be a huge business "win" for US soccer. It's a political statement, an Agenda.. not a sales boom

[awesome guy]

What's really funny is how all the capitalists here are having a temper tantrum over a marketing/business decision.

What's much more hilarious is that you think it was a business decision.. lol

You're dense enough to think this is about selling jerseys?