Page 2 of 4

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:19 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:19 pm
by cwtcr hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go

Why??
Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:25 pm
by awesome guy
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Why??
Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted
Yep

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:26 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:48 pm
by 133743Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go

Why??
Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:07 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted
Yep
Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:08 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote: The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted
Yep
Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.
They withheld evidence in a previous case.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:09 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.
You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:09 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.
You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.
Ok, busted.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:30 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.
You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.
Ok, busted.
So, we'll go with most of them? Or is that too in the middle?

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:36 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.
You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.
Ok, busted.
So, we'll go with most of them? Or is that too in the middle?
I'll go with most

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:52 pm
by HooFighter
USN_Hokie wrote:Do you disapprove of shooting your way to a Congressional majority?
Yes.
USN_Hokie wrote:Is there anything on his Facebook page you'd disagree with? If not, how are you any different?
See above.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:30 pm
by Attila T Hun
HooFighter wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:The best part is these morons know they are breaking the law and run around in vehicles that have lights out or other major mechanical issues are incredulous when they get pulled over.
They should just tweet about how oppressed they are and how everyone is out to get them.
Boo,Hoo!!

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:40 pm
by USN_Hokie
133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:46 pm
by USN_Hokie
HooFighter wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Do you disapprove of shooting your way to a Congressional majority?
Yes.
USN_Hokie wrote:Is there anything on his Facebook page you'd disagree with? If not, how are you any different?
See above.
See above? Nope, sorry, the shooting wasn't on his Facebook page.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:33 pm
by HokieFanDC
USN_Hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.
And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:44 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.
And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.
Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:53 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.
And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.
Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.
Must be. I didn't say they were moderate. I said all of them weren't uber libs. Just most. And well, you agreed. So, clearly, you have problems understanding yourself.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:55 pm
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.
And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.
Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.
Must be. I didn't say they were moderate. I said all of them weren't uber libs. Just most. And well, you agreed. So, clearly, you have problems understanding yourself.
Uh huh

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:55 pm
by HokieFanDC
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote: Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.

What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted
Yep
Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.
They withheld evidence in a previous case.
Who, and what cases?

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:03 am
by awesome guy
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not tainted
Yep
Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.
They withheld evidence in a previous case.
Who, and what cases?
I'll have to check, that's what Newt said on the tube.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:17 am
by RiverguyVT
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go

Why??
Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Whiney or not, any one of these reasons alone is enough by itself.

The next 25 posts aren't needed if one reason, alone, is enough.
This whole thing is a circus, unnecessary, etc.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:22 am
by USN_Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote: They withheld evidence in a previous case.
Who, and what cases?
Did you or did you not admit in another thread that Trump had the right to fire Comey? If so, the entire premise of this purse fight is moot.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:47 am
by HokieFanDC
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go

Why??
Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
Whiney or not, any one of these reasons alone is enough by itself.

The next 25 posts aren't needed if one reason, alone, is enough.
This whole thing is a circus, unnecessary, etc.
Mueller has been around long enough, and has been reputable, respected, and distinguished for a long time, that it should take more than Newt bitching, to get rid of him.

Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:51 am
by HokieFanDC
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
awesome guy wrote: They withheld evidence in a previous case.
Who, and what cases?
Did you or did you not admit in another thread that Trump had the right to fire Comey? If so, the entire premise of this purse fight is moot.
I didn't "admit" that, that's a bizarre way to put it, but Trump certainly has the authority to do so.
Not sure how that is meaningful.