United We Stand - uwsboard.com

McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

He's another establishment snake needing to be drained. I'm sure this means he's going full anti-Trump and will work to contain the Obama and Clinton investigations.

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

When every you see a politician behaving in ways that make no sense (like going to foreign countries and criticizing our sitting President), or advocate for policies that anti-conservative (even tho the pol claims to be a conservative) you have to follow the money. And it seems 9 times out of 10, that money trail leads to Soros.

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

It's a tough issue. On the one hand, politicians are uniquely qualified to pull in charitable donations to good causes. On the other, the moral hazard can be enormous.

VisorBoy wrote:

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

It's a tough issue. On the one hand, politicians are uniquely qualified to pull in charitable donations to good causes. On the other, the moral hazard can be enormous.

It's a non-profit 501(c)(3) think tank like the Heritage Foundation. His donors are all big businesses (Daimler, Cisco, GE, Wal-Mart) who want to peddle influence. The EU even gave a grant. That's all it is. There's no charity.

USN_Hokie wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

It's a tough issue. On the one hand, politicians are uniquely qualified to pull in charitable donations to good causes. On the other, the moral hazard can be enormous.

It's a non-profit 501(c)(3) think tank like the Heritage Foundation. His donors are all big businesses (Daimler, Cisco, GE, Wal-Mart) who want to peddle influence. The EU even gave a grant. That's all it is. There's no charity.

It has a focus on leadership training and also does work for good causes, like human trafficking at the most recent Sedona Forum.

VisorBoy wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

It's a tough issue. On the one hand, politicians are uniquely qualified to pull in charitable donations to good causes. On the other, the moral hazard can be enormous.

It's a non-profit 501(c)(3) think tank like the Heritage Foundation. His donors are all big businesses (Daimler, Cisco, GE, Wal-Mart) who want to peddle influence. The EU even gave a grant. That's all it is. There's no charity.

It has a focus on leadership training and also does work for good causes, like human trafficking at the most recent Sedona Forum.

Yeah, they talked about stuff. World is saved!

USN_Hokie wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

BigDave wrote:McCain has his own pay-to-play foundation similar to the Clinton crime syndicate.

Notable is that he funded it with $9 million in unspent funds from the 2008 campaign. Because I'm sure that's what his donors wanted their money spent on - don't use that money to try to defeat Obama - instead use it to fund your crime syndicate.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/19/exclu ... institute/

It's a tough issue. On the one hand, politicians are uniquely qualified to pull in charitable donations to good causes. On the other, the moral hazard can be enormous.

It's a non-profit 501(c)(3) think tank like the Heritage Foundation. His donors are all big businesses (Daimler, Cisco, GE, Wal-Mart) who want to peddle influence. The EU even gave a grant. That's all it is. There's no charity.

It has a focus on leadership training and also does work for good causes, like human trafficking at the most recent Sedona Forum.

Yeah, they talked about stuff. World is saved!

It goes to their description as charitable/good cause.

VisorBoy wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:
Yeah, they talked about stuff. World is saved!

It goes to their description as charitable/good cause.

I guess this means BigDave can call UWS a charity (The Human Fund Institute?) and collect those millions he makes in ad revenue tax free.