Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White House
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White House
Bloomberg, Exxon, and other major US corporations filling the leadership void left by trump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
Trying too hard
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 2:33 am
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
When do you think the man-love of the Flim-Flam Man by Far Righties will end? What will it take to end it? When do you think the Far Righties will realize they can't run against their hated "Hillary" forever?
When will they Man Up and say " WE are now responsible".
Seems they "The Righties" are having a hard time coming to grips with this one?
Who really won 2016? The Far Righties?, The Republican Party, or the Flim-Flam Man?
Their Trumpster has hoodwinked them all .... and its showing up ever day.
Burma Shave!
When will they Man Up and say " WE are now responsible".
Seems they "The Righties" are having a hard time coming to grips with this one?
Who really won 2016? The Far Righties?, The Republican Party, or the Flim-Flam Man?
Their Trumpster has hoodwinked them all .... and its showing up ever day.
Burma Shave!
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26576
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
Well, one thing we know......your party didn't win and is still in a shambles.......houtexhokie wrote:When do you think the man-love of the Flim-Flam Man by Far Righties will end? What will it take to end it? When do you think the Far Righties will realize they can't run against their hated "Hillary" forever?
When will they Man Up and say " WE are now responsible".
Seems they "The Righties" are having a hard time coming to grips with this one?
Who really won 2016? The Far Righties?, The Republican Party, or the Flim-Flam Man?
Their Trumpster has hoodwinked them all .... and its showing up ever day.
Burma Shave!
Carry on!
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
0-4 in congressional elections since the flim flam man kicked your woman to the curb, can your dems win a dogcatcher election?houtexhokie wrote:When do you think the man-love of the Flim-Flam Man by Far Righties will end? What will it take to end it? When do you think the Far Righties will realize they can't run against their hated "Hillary" forever?
When will they Man Up and say " WE are now responsible".
Seems they "The Righties" are having a hard time coming to grips with this one?
Who really won 2016? The Far Righties?, The Republican Party, or the Flim-Flam Man?
Their Trumpster has hoodwinked them all .... and its showing up ever day.
Burma Shave!
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
please explain how renewables can provide the energy required even today? you do realize with the heat in the west this month the power companies are having blackouts due to not being able to supply all the power necessary, but wind and solar can supply all the energy needed even today, not if you cover the planet in panels!!!fatman wrote:Bloomberg, Exxon, and other major US corporations filling the leadership void left by trump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
- UpstateSCHokie
- Posts: 11956
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
When will you start posting about how much disarray the Democrat party is in? Ya know, like you did for years about the GOP? About how the GOP could never win another national election because of the "fundies." Any comment on the "fundies" now running your party?houtexhokie wrote:When do you think the man-love of the Flim-Flam Man by Far Righties will end? What will it take to end it? When do you think the Far Righties will realize they can't run against their hated "Hillary" forever?
When will they Man Up and say " WE are now responsible".
Seems they "The Righties" are having a hard time coming to grips with this one?
Who really won 2016? The Far Righties?, The Republican Party, or the Flim-Flam Man?
Their Trumpster has hoodwinked them all .... and its showing up ever day.
Burma Shave!
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
Your arguments focus too much on the extremes. It doesn't have to be about all energy from renewable sources, it's about finding energy sources that can provide our long-term energy needs at a reasonable cost.cwtcr hokie wrote:please explain how renewables can provide the energy required even today? you do realize with the heat in the west this month the power companies are having blackouts due to not being able to supply all the power necessary, but wind and solar can supply all the energy needed even today, not if you cover the planet in panels!!!fatman wrote:Bloomberg, Exxon, and other major US corporations filling the leadership void left by trump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
We didn't go from horse and buggy to car overnight, or calculator to smart phone, it takes time.
People who know, know.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
I am responding to what he posts about renewables, he is in the fantasy world that we can have zero fossil fuel energy creation and all renewables.... that is not possible now and by the time it is the planet will have changed enough to make humans extinct. It is not a logical idea, thus why I ask how it is possible. Never mind that if you blanket the planet in solar panels it may have a slight affect on the planet.TheH2 wrote:Your arguments focus too much on the extremes. It doesn't have to be about all energy from renewable sources, it's about finding energy sources that can provide our long-term energy needs at a reasonable cost.cwtcr hokie wrote:please explain how renewables can provide the energy required even today? you do realize with the heat in the west this month the power companies are having blackouts due to not being able to supply all the power necessary, but wind and solar can supply all the energy needed even today, not if you cover the planet in panels!!!fatman wrote:Bloomberg, Exxon, and other major US corporations filling the leadership void left by trump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
We didn't go from horse and buggy to car overnight, or calculator to smart phone, it takes time.
Yes renewable can be a small part of our energy generation, no issue with that
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30300
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
I'm confused. I thought Exxon was evil and in the presidents pocket
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Progress continues even w/o leadership in the White Hous
You aren't responding to my post if you are responding to someone in a fantasy world. Read the link above, even 20 years from now fossil fuels will still contribute 30-40 percent of energy supply. Within fossil fuels, natgas will continue to displace expensive and dirty coal. You make excrement up cw, because you can't follow the conversation.cwtcr hokie wrote:I am responding to what he posts about renewables, he is in the fantasy world that we can have zero fossil fuel energy creation and all renewables.... that is not possible now and by the time it is the planet will have changed enough to make humans extinct. It is not a logical idea, thus why I ask how it is possible. Never mind that if you blanket the planet in solar panels it may have a slight affect on the planet.TheH2 wrote:Your arguments focus too much on the extremes. It doesn't have to be about all energy from renewable sources, it's about finding energy sources that can provide our long-term energy needs at a reasonable cost.cwtcr hokie wrote:please explain how renewables can provide the energy required even today? you do realize with the heat in the west this month the power companies are having blackouts due to not being able to supply all the power necessary, but wind and solar can supply all the energy needed even today, not if you cover the planet in panels!!!fatman wrote:Bloomberg, Exxon, and other major US corporations filling the leadership void left by trump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... limate-fix
This is simple, practical, led by industry, and twice as effective as obamas plan.
Economics are trumping Trumps lack of leadership on climate/energy:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
Coal is not only a massive pollutant, but it is increasingly uneconomical. No matter how foolishly Trump tries to push coal as the future, the math doesn't work. Trump is irrelevant on this issue, progress will continue by busIness/government leaders who enjoy much better vision than trump.
"Clean coal" option failed to work, even after trump wasting millions on a foolish idea, the economics of coal doom it to a fuel from be gone era:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... =157392052
$billions in write downs coming following this government funded horrifically bad idea. Clean(ish), abondant Natgas is cheap and will be the bridge fuel until renewables blow past it.
We didn't go from horse and buggy to car overnight, or calculator to smart phone, it takes time.
Yes renewable can be a small part of our energy generation, no issue with that