the resistance, a partisan phenomenon w/ no crossover appeal

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
UpstateSCHokie
Posts: 11907
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm

the resistance, a partisan phenomenon w/ no crossover appeal

Post by UpstateSCHokie »

That describes what it is perfectly. A rigid ideology that has no tolerance for anything except doctrinaire hard line positions of social issues.

Are you pro-choice? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you pro-gun? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you pro-traditional marriage? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you pro-traditional bathrooms? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you pro-unity (i.e. anti-multiculturalism)? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you against illegal immigration? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

Are you are straight white Christian male with a traditional viewpoint? if so, the "resistance" doesn't want you.

It's funny how the left used to always lecture the right about "dropping the social issues" and yet its now the left that is all-in on social issues and losing election after election. Of course if they stray away from these anti-mainstream positions, they will lose many of their big money donors. Quite the pickle.

=======================================
To win, Democrats will do anything except lay off the culture war
By Rich Lowry
June 22, 2017

How much do Democrats really want to defeat President Trump?

There’s no doubt that Democrats want to watch TV programs that excoriate the president. They want to give money to candidates opposing him. They want to fantasize about frog-marching him straight from his impeachment proceedings to the nearest federal penitentiary.

But do they want to do the one thing that would make it easier to win tough races in marginal areas, namely moderate on the cultural issue? Not so much.

In retrospect, Jon Ossoff’s loss in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District was overdetermined. He didn’t live in the district. He had no record of public service. Youthful to a fault, he looked like he should have been running for class president.

Yet it didn’t help that he was an orthodox liberal who conceded nothing on cultural issues, even though he was running in a Republican district in the South.

In this, Ossoff merely reflected his party’s attitude. Stopping Trump is imperative, so long as it doesn’t require the party rethinking its uncompromising stance on abortion, guns or immigration. Every old rule should be thrown out in the cause of the resistance — except the tried-and-true orthodoxies on social issues.

The Georgia election showed the limits of the resistance, a partisan phenomenon with no crossover appeal. The idea that a significant portion of the GOP is watching CNN’s hour-by-hour coverage of the so-called Russia scandal and eagerly awaiting the opportunity to send a message to Trump about how Michael Flynn should’ve been more careful about disclosing his lobbying work is otherworldly.

What’s more, to the extent that the resistance is about literally ousting Trump from office, it courts a backlash to the backlash. This is what happened in Georgia — Democrats turned out in an anti-Trump backlash, while Republicans turned out in an anti-anti-Trump backlash.

This is why Ossoff was right to try to downplay his opposition to Trump and try to sound like a pragmatist on fiscal issues. It just wasn’t very credible. Tens of millions of progressive dollars didn’t flood into the district to elect a polite young fiscal conservative with no strong feelings about Trump. Ossoff was easily attacked as a callow creation of the resistance and a would-be foot soldier for Nancy Pelosi.

She is a national target like Newt Gingrich was in the late 1990s. The upside of having her as the speaker-in-waiting is not obvious, but certainly serves the GOP’s interests.

Plus, Ossoff didn’t immunize himself at all. He was down-the-line pro-choice on abortion. He didn’t dissent from typical liberal views on gun control. He parroted the usual lines about “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Departures on these issues are important. They’re genuine statements of independence from the national party. They signal a sympathy with the concerns of culturally conservative voters who might not support Republican economics. They take the edge off the perception of the Democrats as a high-handed coastal party.

Even symbolism goes a long way — Bill Clinton got a lot of mileage out of his “Sister Souljah moment” and his mostly meaningless hope for abortion to be “safe, legal and rare.”

It’s not just that national Democrats don’t believe any give on these issues is politically necessary — they positively oppose it.

A couple of months ago, national activists brought the hammer down on Heath Mello, a candidate for mayor of Omaha, Neb., for the offense of being personally opposed to abortion and once having supported restrictions.

To his credit, Bernie Sanders stood by his endorsement of Mello (who lost). Such is the fever of the national party on cultural issues that the socialist is the relatively reasonable one. A senator from a small, rural state who cares only about the economy, Sanders wasn’t until recently beaten into complete agreement with Democratic orthodoxy on race, guns and immigration.

In a valuable piece in The Atlantic, Peter Beinart notes how the concern that Sanders once expressed about immigrants undercutting US wages used to be a fairly standard Democratic position. Beinart argues that if Hillary Clinton had expressed any worry about the effects of mass immigration or pointedly promoted assimilation, she probably would’ve been elected president.

Democrats would do well to think about that a little more than about Russia. But they won’t. They oppose Donald Trump fiercely and vociferously. Just not enough to learn anything.

http://nypost.com/2017/06/22/to-win-dem ... lture-war/
Image

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: the resistance, a partisan phenomenon w/ no crossover ap

Post by oaktonhokie »

I believe the republicans have the opportunity RIGHT NOW to crush the liberals/socialists.

I believe they will shrink from the task and resume sitting in the back of the bus, gratefully accepting secondary citizen status to maintain their phony baloney careers and committee assignments.

Right now, maybe as never before, the right has the chance to expose the left and its hypocrisy, it deception and its anti american leanings. They have already been partially exposed by wikileaks, media lies and fat hillary deceit. Republicans and conservatives need to move in for the kill. Conservatism can win the day if it has a champion.

Odd that the champion carrying the hopes of the conservatives as well as the nation is not a conservative, not a politician, and only an occasional republican.
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: the resistance, a partisan phenomenon w/ no crossover ap

Post by awesome guy »

oaktonhokie wrote:I believe the republicans have the opportunity RIGHT NOW to crush the liberals/socialists.

I believe they will shrink from the task and resume sitting in the back of the bus, gratefully accepting secondary citizen status to maintain their phony baloney careers and committee assignments.

Right now, maybe as never before, the right has the chance to expose the left and its hypocrisy, it deception and its anti american leanings. They have already been partially exposed by wikileaks, media lies and fat hillary deceit. Republicans and conservatives need to move in for the kill. Conservatism can win the day if it has a champion.

Odd that the champion carrying the hopes of the conservatives as well as the nation is not a conservative, not a politician, and only an occasional republican.
Yep
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Post Reply