This seems pretty straightforward....133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote:There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.HokieFanDC wrote:Like I said, you're in over your head, and don't know what you're talking about. Kushner had a meeting with Kislyak (those are Kushner's words) and Flynn in Trump tower, discussing a secure communication line between the transition team and Russia, inside the Russian embassy.USN_Hokie wrote:He didn't have a meeting with Kislyak, he attended an event where he was present and shook his hand. Russian banker? That doesn't mean shirt per the SF-86.HokieFanDC wrote:[
Agreed. But we know at least not me was with Kislyak, and one was with a Russian banker for on a bank under US sanctions. Those aren't minor.
Both are pretty minor in perspective. It's the nutjobs who think you need to name ever taco stand vendor you've encountered in the last 7yrs.
And meeting the head of a Russian owned bank, who was appointed by Putin, and a bank under US sanctions, is a big deal.
It's illegal for someone to even discuss certain types of business with those banks.
You should try googling some stuff and get yourself up to speed. Or, just keep calling people imbeciles. Your choice.
Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Have to list overseas trips, yesawesome guy wrote:133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote:There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.HokieFanDC wrote:Like I said, you're in over your head, and don't know what you're talking about. Kushner had a meeting with Kislyak (those are Kushner's words) and Flynn in Trump tower, discussing a secure communication line between the transition team and Russia, inside the Russian embassy.USN_Hokie wrote:
He didn't have a meeting with Kislyak, he attended an event where he was present and shook his hand. Russian banker? That doesn't mean shirt per the SF-86.
Both are pretty minor in perspective. It's the nutjobs who think you need to name ever taco stand vendor you've encountered in the last 7yrs.
And meeting the head of a Russian owned bank, who was appointed by Putin, and a bank under US sanctions, is a big deal.
It's illegal for someone to even discuss certain types of business with those banks.
You should try googling some stuff and get yourself up to speed. Or, just keep calling people imbeciles. Your choice.
I had to and without the poly. Listed trips overseas and all of that too.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15749
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
After reading thru SF-86 12/10, somewhere around Page 75 I'd just say "FI".
I've worked for several multinational and international companies. I've worked internationally, there is no way I could list everything the gubment wants.
No gubment security work for me.
It does make me wonder if there is a SF-86 r' Us company out there that fills these forms out for the regular masses
I've worked for several multinational and international companies. I've worked internationally, there is no way I could list everything the gubment wants.
No gubment security work for me.
It does make me wonder if there is a SF-86 r' Us company out there that fills these forms out for the regular masses
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.HokieFanDC wrote:This seems pretty straightforward....133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote:There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.HokieFanDC wrote:Like I said, you're in over your head, and don't know what you're talking about. Kushner had a meeting with Kislyak (those are Kushner's words) and Flynn in Trump tower, discussing a secure communication line between the transition team and Russia, inside the Russian embassy.USN_Hokie wrote: He didn't have a meeting with Kislyak, he attended an event where he was present and shook his hand. Russian banker? That doesn't mean shirt per the SF-86.
Both are pretty minor in perspective. It's the nutjobs who think you need to name ever taco stand vendor you've encountered in the last 7yrs.
And meeting the head of a Russian owned bank, who was appointed by Putin, and a bank under US sanctions, is a big deal.
It's illegal for someone to even discuss certain types of business with those banks.
You should try googling some stuff and get yourself up to speed. Or, just keep calling people imbeciles. Your choice.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Yep133743Hokie wrote:That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.HokieFanDC wrote:This seems pretty straightforward....133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote:There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.HokieFanDC wrote: Like I said, you're in over your head, and don't know what you're talking about. Kushner had a meeting with Kislyak (those are Kushner's words) and Flynn in Trump tower, discussing a secure communication line between the transition team and Russia, inside the Russian embassy.
And meeting the head of a Russian owned bank, who was appointed by Putin, and a bank under US sanctions, is a big deal.
It's illegal for someone to even discuss certain types of business with those banks.
You should try googling some stuff and get yourself up to speed. Or, just keep calling people imbeciles. Your choice.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Once you complete the initial application you constantly keep it updated so you are ready for your PR. It does take some time to do the initial.Major Kong wrote:After reading thru SF-86 12/10, somewhere around Page 75 I'd just say "FI".
I've worked for several multinational and international companies. I've worked internationally, there is no way I could list everything the gubment wants.
No gubment security work for me.
It does make me wonder if there is a SF-86 r' Us company out there that fills these forms out for the regular masses
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Total pain in the butt, getting SSN and addresses for family stunk.133743Hokie wrote:Once you complete the initial application you constantly keep it updated so you are ready for your PR. It does take some time to do the initial.Major Kong wrote:After reading thru SF-86 12/10, somewhere around Page 75 I'd just say "FI".
I've worked for several multinational and international companies. I've worked internationally, there is no way I could list everything the gubment wants.
No gubment security work for me.
It does make me wonder if there is a SF-86 r' Us company out there that fills these forms out for the regular masses
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
That's a unique perspective on a meeting with the Russian ambassador, about setting up a line of communication outside the normal lines of communication...133743Hokie wrote:That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.HokieFanDC wrote:This seems pretty straightforward....133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote: There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.
Not even Kushner, or his people, are attempting to make that argument.
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
DC has already made a final adjudication on Kushner's clearance based on Google searches and Keith Olbermann tweets.133743Hokie wrote:"Meetings" don't show up on your clearance form.HokieFanDC wrote:LOL. Lying on the clearance form should be reason enough not to get clearance. He submitted a BS form to start with. Then after months of revising it, he still "left out" meetings. How many chances do you think he should get?USN_Hokie wrote:Clearly? Please explain your rationale and bonafides.HokieFanDC wrote:Clearly, with Kushner, his position has allowed him to retain his clearance. How many "oops" do you get with regard to your disclosures, before it's clear you can't be trusted?BigDave wrote:I have always assumed (not sure if it is a good assumption or a bad assumption) that a lot of regime officials on both sides could not get a security clearance if they were, say, applying to work as a software developer for a government contractor, but can only get one because the regime wants them to.USN_Hokie wrote:And? He has a high level clearance that someone like yourself, being a lover of Trotsky and associating with "Johns", would very likely not be eligible for.
The government thinks he's more trustworthy than you. Maybe something to think about...
Maybe he should take a polygraph as a test of his trustworthiness. That would be a good start, because the initial results of his clearance process are pretty lousy.
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
I had to find my MIL's immigration paperwork from 1947 as well as the court which granted her citizenship.awesome guy wrote:Total pain in the butt, getting SSN and addresses for family stunk.133743Hokie wrote:Once you complete the initial application you constantly keep it updated so you are ready for your PR. It does take some time to do the initial.Major Kong wrote:After reading thru SF-86 12/10, somewhere around Page 75 I'd just say "FI".
I've worked for several multinational and international companies. I've worked internationally, there is no way I could list everything the gubment wants.
No gubment security work for me.
It does make me wonder if there is a SF-86 r' Us company out there that fills these forms out for the regular masses
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
You really have no idea what you are talking about. Please close the Google tab in your browser.HokieFanDC wrote:That's a unique perspective on a meeting with the Russian ambassador, about setting up a line of communication outside the normal lines of communication...133743Hokie wrote:That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.HokieFanDC wrote:This seems pretty straightforward....133743Hokie wrote:No you don't. That is part of a poly.awesome guy wrote:you're supposed to list contacts and that's where it gets tricky as the democrats are trying to claim him shaking hands with anyone is a contact as well as multi-person meetings from last year. Meanwhile they were A OK with people associated with known terrorists and desires to undermine the government having clearances. It's a glaring display of hypocrisy.133743Hokie wrote: There is no place on the SF-86 to document the occurrence of that meeting.
Not even Kushner, or his people, are attempting to make that argument.
#'sHokie is right.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
I'll take Kushner's word that he made a mistake by not disclosing it, and that of all the people who agree he should have disclosed a meeting with the Russian ambassador, over #sHokie, and certainly over a guy who didn't know Kushner met with Kislyak until a few hours ago. I'll listen to what #sHokie has to say about the necessity of disclosing a meeting with a Russian official who will have lots of contact with the Trump admin, which is more than just a foreign national.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:You really have no idea what you are talking about. Please close the Google tab in your browser.133743Hokie wrote:That's a unique perspective on a meeting with the Russian ambassador, about setting up a line of communication outside the normal lines of communication...HokieFanDC wrote:That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.133743Hokie wrote:This seems pretty straightforward....awesome guy wrote: No you don't. That is part of a poly.
Not even Kushner, or his people, are attempting to make that argument.
#'sHokie is right.
You, on the other hand, have zero credibility on this subject.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15749
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
I think the closest I ever came was in Alaska when I was named the "manager" of an onshore fuel storage tank facility (16 million gallons) that was identified as a potential terrorist target by Homeland Security in 2002.133743Hokie wrote:Once you complete the initial application you constantly keep it updated so you are ready for your PR. It does take some time to do the initial.
Talk about FUBAR crazy...it was located ¼ mile on shore and the only way to supply the tank field was via barge. So the Coast Guard (CG) was responsible until the 1st valve inside containment, the land it was surrounded by was National Park land but the land itself was owned by the State of Alaska.
In turn the the State of Alaska leased the property out to an Alaska Native Corporation who in turn had a working agreement with a Canadian company.
To make it all the more interesting is the CG didn't monitor the facility but once every 3 years so I was also the CG facility coordinator.
I spent a whole week at the Federal Building in Anchorage filling out paperwork and being interviewed by folks but I don't remember that form though.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
#'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.HokieFanDC wrote:I'll take Kushner's word that he made a mistake by not disclosing it, and that of all the people who agree he should have disclosed a meeting with the Russian ambassador, over #sHokie, and certainly over a guy who didn't know Kushner met with Kislyak until a few hours ago. I'll listen to what #sHokie has to say about the necessity of disclosing a meeting with a Russian official who will have lots of contact with the Trump admin, which is more than just a foreign national.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:You really have no idea what you are talking about. Please close the Google tab in your browser.133743Hokie wrote:That's a unique perspective on a meeting with the Russian ambassador, about setting up a line of communication outside the normal lines of communication...HokieFanDC wrote:That is specifically related to "close and/or continuing contact", i.e. foreigners that you know well and interact with regularly. It does not apply to one-off meetings or casual acquaintances, and that was clarified to me by the investigators years ago. My acquaintances were clarified and discussed during the poly.133743Hokie wrote: This seems pretty straightforward....
Not even Kushner, or his people, are attempting to make that argument.
#'sHokie is right.
You, on the other hand, have zero credibility on this subject.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
DOE? They have their own equally complicated system.Major Kong wrote:I think the closest I ever came was in Alaska when I was named the "manager" of an onshore fuel storage tank facility (16 million gallons) that was identified as a potential terrorist target by Homeland Security in 2002.133743Hokie wrote:Once you complete the initial application you constantly keep it updated so you are ready for your PR. It does take some time to do the initial.
Talk about FUBAR crazy...it was located ¼ mile on shore and the only way to supply the tank field was via barge. So the Coast Guard (CG) was responsible until the 1st valve inside containment, the land it was surrounded by was National Park land but the land itself was owned by the State of Alaska.
In turn the the State of Alaska leased the property out to an Alaska Native Corporation who in turn had a working agreement with a Canadian company.
To make it all the more interesting is the CG didn't monitor the facility but once every 3 years so I was also the CG facility coordinator.
I spent a whole week at the Federal Building in Anchorage filling out paperwork and being interviewed by folks but I don't remember that form though.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Seems like you guys aren't even trying.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:#'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.USN_Hokie wrote:I'll take Kushner's word that he made a mistake by not disclosing it, and that of all the people who agree he should have disclosed a meeting with the Russian ambassador, over #sHokie, and certainly over a guy who didn't know Kushner met with Kislyak until a few hours ago. I'll listen to what #sHokie has to say about the necessity of disclosing a meeting with a Russian official who will have lots of contact with the Trump admin, which is more than just a foreign national.HokieFanDC wrote:133743Hokie wrote: You really have no idea what you are talking about. Please close the Google tab in your browser.
#'sHokie is right.
You, on the other hand, have zero credibility on this subject.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
I mean, we have self-proclaimed experts making proclamations, insulting people, and acting soooo incredibly knowledgeable.
Unfortunately for you, there is a Google, and it's useful for when you sense bullshirt.
Now, I'm not an expert, and admit that. But, there seems to be no reason for the resident genius experts not to fully understand this part of the form.
It's almost like you're talking out of your asses, and are too lazy to actually read the from you're soooo familiar with. Or not.
The key term here is "FOS", and it applies to you. I eagerly await your explanation as to why Kushner had no need to disclose the meeting in this section.....
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15749
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
It didn't fall under the DOE but USDOT at that time and then transferred over to Homeland Security.USN_Hokie wrote:DOE? They have their own equally complicated system.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
I fully understand that form, having first completed one in the mid 80s and having updated my information over the years as the forms have evolved. Until retiring 9 years ago I held TS/SCI level (or agency equivalent) poly-based clearances with just about every government entity except DOE (didn't have a need to get Q). I was badged with staff-like access into the WH, DOS, the major intelligence agency HQs (as well as numerous affiliated domestic "sites") and cleared to work in all aspects of US embassies, including the core and "tenant spaces". This was my career for almost 30 years. I lived with clearances for 30 years. I created, transported, transmitted, received and destroyed classified documents.HokieFanDC wrote:Seems like you guys aren't even trying.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:#'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.USN_Hokie wrote:I'll take Kushner's word that he made a mistake by not disclosing it, and that of all the people who agree he should have disclosed a meeting with the Russian ambassador, over #sHokie, and certainly over a guy who didn't know Kushner met with Kislyak until a few hours ago. I'll listen to what #sHokie has to say about the necessity of disclosing a meeting with a Russian official who will have lots of contact with the Trump admin, which is more than just a foreign national.HokieFanDC wrote:133743Hokie wrote: You really have no idea what you are talking about. Please close the Google tab in your browser.
#'sHokie is right.
You, on the other hand, have zero credibility on this subject.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
I mean, we have self-proclaimed experts making proclamations, insulting people, and acting soooo incredibly knowledgeable.
Unfortunately for you, there is a Google, and it's useful for when you sense bullshirt.
Now, I'm not an expert, and admit that. But, there seems to be no reason for the resident genius experts not to fully understand this part of the form.
It's almost like you're talking out of your asses, and are too lazy to actually read the from you're soooo familiar with. Or not.
The key term here is "FOS", and it applies to you. I eagerly await your explanation as to why Kushner had no need to disclose the meeting in this section.....
I filled the forms out. I spoke with investigators, I discussed the documents with poly administrators. My casual foreign acquaintances were not to be included in that section of the form.Trust me when I tell you I know what I'm talking about.
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Says the guy who cited the wrong section. You wasted everyone's time citing 19B and now want to call people stupid as you wade through Google.HokieFanDC wrote: Seems like you guys aren't even trying.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Do you have Google though?133743Hokie wrote:I fully understand that form, having first completed one in the mid 80s and having updated my information over the years as the forms have evolved. Until retiring 9 years ago I held TS/SCI level (or agency equivalent) poly-based clearances with just about every government entity except DOE (didn't have a need to get Q). I was badged with staff-like access into the WH, DOS, the major intelligence agency HQs (as well as numerous affiliated domestic "sites") and cleared to work in all aspects of US embassies, including the core and "tenant spaces". This was my career for almost 30 years. I lived with clearances for 30 years. I created, transported, transmitted, received and destroyed classified documents.HokieFanDC wrote:Seems like you guys aren't even trying.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:#'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.USN_Hokie wrote:I'll take Kushner's word that he made a mistake by not disclosing it, and that of all the people who agree he should have disclosed a meeting with the Russian ambassador, over #sHokie, and certainly over a guy who didn't know Kushner met with Kislyak until a few hours ago. I'll listen to what #sHokie has to say about the necessity of disclosing a meeting with a Russian official who will have lots of contact with the Trump admin, which is more than just a foreign national.HokieFanDC wrote:
You, on the other hand, have zero credibility on this subject.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
I mean, we have self-proclaimed experts making proclamations, insulting people, and acting soooo incredibly knowledgeable.
Unfortunately for you, there is a Google, and it's useful for when you sense bullshirt.
Now, I'm not an expert, and admit that. But, there seems to be no reason for the resident genius experts not to fully understand this part of the form.
It's almost like you're talking out of your asses, and are too lazy to actually read the from you're soooo familiar with. Or not.
The key term here is "FOS", and it applies to you. I eagerly await your explanation as to why Kushner had no need to disclose the meeting in this section.....
I filled the forms out. I spoke with investigators, I discussed the documents with poly administrators. My casual foreign acquaintances were not to be included in that section of the form.Trust me when I tell you I know what I'm talking about.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Did you have meetings with foreign government officials, that you asked about? Yes, or no.133743Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I fully understand that form, having first completed one in the mid 80s and having updated my information over the years as the forms have evolved. Until retiring 9 years ago I held TS/SCI level (or agency equivalent) poly-based clearances with just about every government entity except DOE (didn't have a need to get Q). I was badged with staff-like access into the WH, DOS, the major intelligence agency HQs (as well as numerous affiliated domestic "sites") and cleared to work in all aspects of US embassies, including the core and "tenant spaces". This was my career for almost 30 years. I lived with clearances for 30 years. I created, transported, transmitted, received and destroyed classified documents.USN_Hokie wrote:Seems like you guys aren't even trying.HokieFanDC wrote:USN_Hokie wrote: #'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
I mean, we have self-proclaimed experts making proclamations, insulting people, and acting soooo incredibly knowledgeable.
Unfortunately for you, there is a Google, and it's useful for when you sense bullshirt.
Now, I'm not an expert, and admit that. But, there seems to be no reason for the resident genius experts not to fully understand this part of the form.
It's almost like you're talking out of your asses, and are too lazy to actually read the from you're soooo familiar with. Or not.
The key term here is "FOS", and it applies to you. I eagerly await your explanation as to why Kushner had no need to disclose the meeting in this section.....
I filled the forms out. I spoke with investigators, I discussed the documents with poly administrators. My casual foreign acquaintances were not to be included in that section of the form.Trust me when I tell you I know what I'm talking about.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
You guys wasted my time. You, as the so-called experts should have known that a meeting with a foreign govt. official would be covered under 20b, not 19b. Instead, you made arguments that the pertinent part was "close and continuing", when the pertinent part was that 19b was the wrong section. So, yes, I'm calling you stupid, because you act like you're knowledgeable, but you don't know any more than I do, and are too lazy and dopey to try and learn something.USN_Hokie wrote:Says the guy who cited the wrong section. You wasted everyone's time citing 19B and now want to call people stupid as you wade through Google.HokieFanDC wrote: Seems like you guys aren't even trying.
You tried to make aoun argument based solely on your proclaimed expertise (trust me!), and when your bluff is called, you can't even admit you're wrong....now for the third time in this thread.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Limited number of meetings with foreign officials, but I did have a few. None were put on the form and in the pre-poly discussion with the administrator, when the question of foreign contacts came up we discussed these contacts and it was made clear the question did not apply to them. (FYI, in case you didn't know, they go over every question they are going to ask you before the poly to make sure you understand the question, its context, and to provide any clarification to questions you may have).HokieFanDC wrote:Did you have meetings with foreign government officials, that you asked about? Yes, or no.133743Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I fully understand that form, having first completed one in the mid 80s and having updated my information over the years as the forms have evolved. Until retiring 9 years ago I held TS/SCI level (or agency equivalent) poly-based clearances with just about every government entity except DOE (didn't have a need to get Q). I was badged with staff-like access into the WH, DOS, the major intelligence agency HQs (as well as numerous affiliated domestic "sites") and cleared to work in all aspects of US embassies, including the core and "tenant spaces". This was my career for almost 30 years. I lived with clearances for 30 years. I created, transported, transmitted, received and destroyed classified documents.USN_Hokie wrote:Seems like you guys aren't even trying.HokieFanDC wrote:USN_Hokie wrote: #'s is right. "Close and continuing" are the key terms.
You should close the Google tab on your browser and get back to your Obamaphone kiosk.
I mean, we have self-proclaimed experts making proclamations, insulting people, and acting soooo incredibly knowledgeable.
Unfortunately for you, there is a Google, and it's useful for when you sense bullshirt.
Now, I'm not an expert, and admit that. But, there seems to be no reason for the resident genius experts not to fully understand this part of the form.
It's almost like you're talking out of your asses, and are too lazy to actually read the from you're soooo familiar with. Or not.
The key term here is "FOS", and it applies to you. I eagerly await your explanation as to why Kushner had no need to disclose the meeting in this section.....
I filled the forms out. I spoke with investigators, I discussed the documents with poly administrators. My casual foreign acquaintances were not to be included in that section of the form.Trust me when I tell you I know what I'm talking about.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30297
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Trump talking pardons and Hillary
Let's be cool, yall
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.