Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
CFB Apologist
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm

Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by CFB Apologist »

Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by cwtcr hokie »

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
The club grants you a license to attend a game. According to the contract, the club can likely revoke that license at its sole discretion. You are correct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
Hokie CPA
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 am
Alma Mater: Norfolk Academy to Virginia Tech
Party: I reject your party
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by Hokie CPA »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

Image
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
Because he's the violent and dangerous one?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
Hokie CPA
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 am
Alma Mater: Norfolk Academy to Virginia Tech
Party: I reject your party
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by Hokie CPA »

awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
Because he's the violent and dangerous one?
Nope. Because this is the atmosphere in which we live.
I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

Image
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
Because he's the violent and dangerous one?
Nope. Because this is the atmosphere in which we live.
One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
Hokie CPA
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 am
Alma Mater: Norfolk Academy to Virginia Tech
Party: I reject your party
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by Hokie CPA »

awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
Because he's the violent and dangerous one?
Nope. Because this is the atmosphere in which we live.
One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

Image
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by oaktonhokie »

That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote: a guy has a right to be a butt head, the ball park is a private business though so the owner can IMO remove anybody that they want to
I agree. Of course, if he's not removed, he may leave with a bunch of new bruises and cuts. Maybe some broken bones. The question then would be, did anyone sitting around him see anything? Probably not.
Because he's the violent and dangerous one?
Nope. Because this is the atmosphere in which we live.
One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
Great point. Most liberals are offensive, can we ban them?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
Great point. Most liberals are offensive, can we ban them?
Maybe if you and Oak can outbid MJ and Jeter for the Marlins.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
The club decides Oak. It's not a tough question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
Great point. Most liberals are offensive, can we ban them?
Maybe if you and Oak can outbid MJ and Jeter for the Marlins.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So offensive libs can be banned? Same sex couples are offensive and repulsive. Ban too? Fat feminists promising no access to their vagina?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
Great point. Most liberals are offensive, can we ban them?
Maybe if you and Oak can outbid MJ and Jeter for the Marlins.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So offensive libs can be banned? Same sex couples are offensive and repulsive. Ban too? Fat feminists promising no access to their vagina?
Sure. The club could ban anyone for expressing any political thought if it wanted. It's up to them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
Hokie CPA
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 am
Alma Mater: Norfolk Academy to Virginia Tech
Party: I reject your party
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by Hokie CPA »

awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
True, but then again if a person is so big on Nazism that he would have it permanently inked onto his body, one could probably assume he has been violent about it at some point in his past. Maybe it was when he was a stupid teenager, but there is violence inherent in Nazism. Does this guy deserve to get his ass kicked for taking off his shirt at a baseball game? I certainly don't think so. But I'm not the one whose going to be beating the $hit out this guy either.
I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

Image
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
True, but then again if a person is so big on Nazism that he would have it permanently inked onto his body, one could probably assume he has been violent about it at some point in his past. Maybe it was when he was a stupid teenager, but there is violence inherent in Nazism. Does this guy deserve to get his ass kicked for taking off his shirt at a baseball game? I certainly don't think so. But I'm not the one whose going to be beating the $hit out this guy either.
If I had paid to attend the game, I'd prefer not to sit next to a Nazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by oaktonhokie »

The question gets more basic...what is offensive?

Of course the team decides, but that is a business decision.

Who in the broader sense decides what is offensive?

What would you do?

ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
The club decides Oak. It's not a tough question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:The question gets more basic...what is offensive?

Of course the team decides, but that is a business decision.

Who in the broader sense decides what is offensive?

What would you do?

ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
The club decides Oak. It's not a tough question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I were the Indians I would tell the guy that he either needs to cover up or he has to leave. Easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by awesome guy »

Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
True, but then again if a person is so big on Nazism that he would have it permanently inked onto his body, one could probably assume he has been violent about it at some point in his past. Maybe it was when he was a stupid teenager, but there is violence inherent in Nazism. Does this guy deserve to get his ass kicked for taking off his shirt at a baseball game? I certainly don't think so. But I'm not the one whose going to be beating the $hit out this guy either.
What violence have neo-nazis done? At worst they vandalize crap. They're a different form of Goths, suburban kids looking to spice up their boring lives.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by oaktonhokie »

Thanx for sharing your preference.

But what would you DO????

ip_law-hokie wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
True, but then again if a person is so big on Nazism that he would have it permanently inked onto his body, one could probably assume he has been violent about it at some point in his past. Maybe it was when he was a stupid teenager, but there is violence inherent in Nazism. Does this guy deserve to get his ass kicked for taking off his shirt at a baseball game? I certainly don't think so. But I'm not the one whose going to be beating the $hit out this guy either.
If I had paid to attend the game, I'd prefer not to sit next to a Nazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:Thanx for sharing your preference.

But what would you DO????

ip_law-hokie wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Hokie CPA wrote:
awesome guy wrote:One where people claim someone else is violent and so attack him, because he's the violent one somehow or another.
Right. Are you going to deny that after all the crap we've seen over the last few years? The last year in particular?
I know who the violent people are, the same ones you're worried about. Not the natzi
True, but then again if a person is so big on Nazism that he would have it permanently inked onto his body, one could probably assume he has been violent about it at some point in his past. Maybe it was when he was a stupid teenager, but there is violence inherent in Nazism. Does this guy deserve to get his ass kicked for taking off his shirt at a baseball game? I certainly don't think so. But I'm not the one whose going to be beating the $hit out this guy either.
If I had paid to attend the game, I'd prefer not to sit next to a Nazi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I were the Indians I would tell the guy that he either needs to cover up or he has to leave.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by oaktonhokie »

And if someone is offended by an american flag tattoo...would you ask that the flag be covered up?

Where is the line? Do you impose your morals on everyone with tattoos in the ballpark?





ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:The question gets more basic...what is offensive?

Of course the team decides, but that is a business decision.

Who in the broader sense decides what is offensive?

What would you do?

ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
The club decides Oak. It's not a tough question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I were the Indians I would tell the guy that he either needs to cover up or he has to leave. Easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by ip_law-hokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:And if someone is offended by an american flag tattoo...would you ask that the flag be covered up?

Where is the line? Do you impose your morals on everyone with tattoos in the ballpark?





ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:The question gets more basic...what is offensive?

Of course the team decides, but that is a business decision.

Who in the broader sense decides what is offensive?

What would you do?

ip_law-hokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:That's actually a tough question.

Who decides what is offensive, and what should be done about it?

I for one, certainly don't want to sit next to anyone who's not wearing a shirt, unless it a VS supermodel. If they had a dress code that said shirts with at least short sleeves must be worn....

But then what if he has his forearms tattooed with the same thing?

An american flag tattoo may offend an open borders la raza sympathizer. Like barrack obama. Should american flag tattoos be banned, because they're offensive?
Someone with young children may want want them exposed to violent imagery with skulls and blood.

Who decides?

For this guy, just cover it up. Be considerate. It's a ball game, not a cross burning.

CFB Apologist wrote:Indians game with shirt off. Where do you stand with this? Remove him from the stadium? Make him put a shirt on? Ban him for life? Nolan, who is pro-business has already weighed in that Nazi tattoos are the ultimate sin and the guy should be removed and not allowed at Indians games.. so what say the rest of you? Is this more offensive than say a neck full of hip hop and hate whitey tattoos?

https://deadspin.com/man-with-nazi-tatt ... socialflow
The club decides Oak. It's not a tough question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I were the Indians I would tell the guy that he either needs to cover up or he has to leave. Easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
American flag tat OK. Topless ladies OK, graphic third base depictions have to cover up.

Of course the club gets to impose their morality on their audience. Its their right. The Indians do not owe any first amendment rights to any of its license holders. It's their prerogative.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Man with clearly visible Nazi tatoos attends

Post by nolanvt »

Boyd Crowder should be allowed to attend Indians games, but support the club's right to remove him if they wish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Post Reply