Unite the Right in Charlottesville

[awesome guy]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

They weren't there to antagonize, they were there to fight, as they did. Three groups of assholes collided and got excrement everywhere. Would have just been 50 assholes marching for an hour with 0 violence if the liberals weren't there to turn it into a violent altercation, as they do with all of their events.

[HokieJoe]

I'm fine with removing Confederate memorials, statues, etc. on public lands.

I have no problem legally allowing them on private land backed by private funding. I'm also okay with people exercising their First Amendment rights in protesting these.

Hope I've made my position clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you mean clear by meaning a 100% opacity then no you didn't.

You're OK with people protesting "these" what

Do you mean the Antifa nimrod group protesting the right of the KKK nimrod group protesting that the City of C'ville removed statues

Here is a hint Antifa nimrods weren't there to protest statues they were there to stifle the KKK nimrods protest.

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you do hate free speech then. Good to know. As for the Confederate symbols, we know that history triggers your delicate snowflake sensibilities, so nothing new there either.

[nolanvt]

I'm fine with removing Confederate memorials, statues, etc. on public lands.

I have no problem legally allowing them on private land backed by private funding. I'm also okay with people exercising their First Amendment rights in protesting these.

Hope I've made my position clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you mean clear by meaning a 100% opacity then no you didn't.

You're OK with people protesting "these" what

Do you mean the Antifa nimrod group protesting the right of the KKK nimrod group protesting that the City of C'ville removed statues

Here is a hint Antifa nimrods weren't there to protest statues they were there to stifle the KKK nimrods protest.

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you weren't an ignorant simpleton then you'd realize the land is often made as a donation to the public along with the monument itself from private donors to display it in the first place. Giant if though and you're just a troll.

I understand that. Go on...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[nolanvt]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HokieJoe]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

It's so weird that you used the term mongoloid. It sprang to mind when I was reading nolan's half-baked post-modern sleaze.

[awesome guy]

I'm fine with removing Confederate memorials, statues, etc. on public lands.

I have no problem legally allowing them on private land backed by private funding. I'm also okay with people exercising their First Amendment rights in protesting these.

Hope I've made my position clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you mean clear by meaning a 100% opacity then no you didn't.

You're OK with people protesting "these" what

Do you mean the Antifa nimrod group protesting the right of the KKK nimrod group protesting that the City of C'ville removed statues

Here is a hint Antifa nimrods weren't there to protest statues they were there to stifle the KKK nimrods protest.

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you weren't an ignorant simpleton then you'd realize the land is often made as a donation to the public along with the monument itself from private donors to display it in the first place. Giant if though and you're just a troll.

I understand that. Go on...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There's nothing to go on for simpleton, the land is in the public domain on the contingency of displaying the monument. The government should return the land to the owner instead of destroying the donation. If only you had a brain, then you would realize this.

[HokieJoe]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We get it Comrade Nolanski- you hate free speech.

[UpstateSCHokie]

Just so the OP of this thread can't say he is unaware of violence coming from the left.

Remember, "when they go low, we go high" or some such B.S.

[USN_Hokie]

I'm fine with removing Confederate memorials, statues, etc. on public lands.

I have no problem legally allowing them on private land backed by private funding. I'm also okay with people exercising their First Amendment rights in protesting these.

Hope I've made my position clear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you mean clear by meaning a 100% opacity then no you didn't.

You're OK with people protesting "these" what

Do you mean the Antifa nimrod group protesting the right of the KKK nimrod group protesting that the City of C'ville removed statues

Here is a hint Antifa nimrods weren't there to protest statues they were there to stifle the KKK nimrods protest.

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you weren't an ignorant simpleton then you'd realize the land is often made as a donation to the public along with the monument itself from private donors to display it in the first place. Giant if though and you're just a troll.

Nolan is a textbook example of the clown show known as situational ethics. With no foundation, he's forced get out a magic decoder ring to evaluate each scenario...and often gets it wrong...or ends up with conflicting opinions.

[Major Kong]

And he just graduated? That's depressing.

You should ask him to define the "alt-right" and then ask him what percent of the US population is made up by the "alt-right." And then ask if its okay to take away the rights from that percent of the population without due process.

Well it is Carson-Newman...the saying around here is if you can't get into college then go to C-N. He got his degree in Social Entrepreneurship (I have no idea) but followed his trim (according to his Dad) to the Valley of the Sun and is employed as a snack bar jockey at one of the movie theater there.

[nolanvt]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We get it Comrade Nolanski- you hate free speech.

To the contrary, I embrace it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[USN_Hokie]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We get it Comrade Nolanski- you hate free speech.

To the contrary, I embrace it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unless frosting is involved. Cake decorating > 1st amendment.

[HokieJoe]

And he just graduated? That's depressing.

You should ask him to define the "alt-right" and then ask him what percent of the US population is made up by the "alt-right." And then ask if its okay to take away the rights from that percent of the population without due process.

Well it is Carson-Newman...the saying around here is if you can't get into college then go to C-N. He got his degree in Social Entrepreneurship (I have no idea) but followed his trim (according to his Dad) to the Valley of the Sun and is employed as a snack bar jockey at one of the movie theater there.

It sort of sounds like one of those Obama inspired community organizer 'degrees'.

[nolanvt]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We get it Comrade Nolanski- you hate free speech.

To the contrary, I embrace it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unless frosting is involved. Cake decorating > 1st amendment.

FAKE NEWS! Protest bakeries if you want.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HokieJoe]

If people want to protest Confederate symbols placed on private lands in my example, then I have no problem with them doing that. If such public pressure means that a private individual or organization decides against it, that's the free market at work.

As for the stuff in C'ville, I generally had no problem with it except for the murderer. I'd rather Nazis be out in the open rather than hidden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is still a bunch of nonsense...have you ever before been asked to clarify what you mean I'm thinking no.

This wasn't the mongoloid Antifa's supporting the removal of monuments...it was Antifa being there to antagonize another mongoloid group.

I have no problem with counterprotesting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We get it Comrade Nolanski- you hate free speech.

To the contrary, I embrace it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

[nolanvt]

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

Any assertion that I'm okay with violence is FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

Any assertion that I'm okay with violence is FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then say it, let's see you say you're against BLM and Antifa attacking the peaceful protestors in Charlottesville.

[nolanvt]

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

Any assertion that I'm okay with violence is FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then say it, let's see you say you're against BLM and Antifa attacking the peaceful protestors in Charlottesville.

I just said it. Violence is not okay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Major Kong]

It sort of sounds like one of those Obama inspired community organizer 'degrees'.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what it is...the upshot is even in Phoenix he can't find a full time job...he couldn't even get hired at Fry's Electronics

His girlfriend (fiancee) at least got her degree in Nursing from C-N but didn't get her TN license and failed her 1st attempt at the AZ RN license in July (she has to wait until February to take it again) but got a CNA job in Mesa.

[HokieJoe]

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

Any assertion that I'm okay with violence is FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then say it, let's see you say you're against BLM and Antifa attacking the peaceful protestors in Charlottesville.

I just said it. Violence is not okay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Glad to hear that.

People of all stripes have the right to peaceably assemble and protest whatever they want. No matter how despicable or lunatic their position may be. Likewise, no one has a right to commit violence against those same people for exercising their lawful right to free speech.

[awesome guy]

So you're not okay with punching NAZI's? You're not okay with hitting people in the head with bike locks? I'd like to get you on record saying that you don't support violence against those exercising their rights of free expression.

Any assertion that I'm okay with violence is FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then say it, let's see you say you're against BLM and Antifa attacking the peaceful protestors in Charlottesville.

I just said it. Violence is not okay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Go on, complete sentence

[ip_law-hokie]

Lexington's Mayor to ask Council to remove two Confederate statues. [emoji106]

http://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/ ... s-49183191


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Two less losers in Lexington.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Major Kong]

Two less losers in Lexington.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is a whole lot more to the issue than what that little blurb by ABC is letting on.

Morgan and Breckinridge's statues are listed on the Federal Register of Historical Places. So there is the issue to cross every t and dot every i and the expense to remove the statues with the utmost care.

The Urban County Arts Review Board in 2015 recommended the statues be removed but the Kentucky Military Commission has final say and they've not been as hip to the idea.

[USN_Hokie]

Lexington's Mayor to ask Council to remove two Confederate statues. [emoji106]

http://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/ ... s-49183191


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Two less losers in Lexington.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One of them was the 14th vice president of the United States. Democrat, of course.

[ip_law-hokie]

Lexington's Mayor to ask Council to remove two Confederate statues. [emoji106]

http://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/ ... s-49183191


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Two less losers in Lexington.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One of them was the 14th vice president of the United States. Democrat, of course.

You are adorable tonight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk