Using their own rules, we're just in physically assaulting them as they're violent and spread ideas harmful to society. Of course that rule is stupid and the problem.
White supremacist believe leadership should be determined by race. Liberals believe leadership should be determined by political purity. There's not much of a difference between the two and they're historically the same group.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/08/ ... remacists/
Liberals claim right to physically attack opposition
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Liberals claim right to physically attack opposition
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Liberals claim right to physically attack opposition
yep, don't agree with what is being said is license to attack the people saying it.......idiotsawesome guy wrote:Using their own rules, we're just in physically assaulting them as they're violent and spread ideas harmful to society. Of course that rule is stupid and the problem.
White supremacist believe leadership should be determined by race. Liberals believe leadership should be determined by political purity. There's not much of a difference between the two and they're historically the same group.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/08/ ... remacists/
the founding fathers are rolling over in their graves, our first right as a citizen is freedom of speech....duh
Re: Liberals claim right to physically attack opposition
Yeah I mentioned this in passing last week. They're equating "violent speech" with "violence" - thus, violence can be used in defense of violent speech...which is really anything they disagree with. It's scary stuff.