The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunton

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by RiverguyVT »

At least you call it rememberance.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by ip_law-hokie »

RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope, built as those memorialized died, as is common practice. Coincidence that it happened with progressive era Jim Crow laws.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by RiverguyVT »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by ip_law-hokie »

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
IIWII. There is nothing to honor about traitors willing to quit their country over slavery.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by RiverguyVT »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
IIWII. There is nothing to honor about traitors willing to quit their country over slavery.
Millions have disagreed with you, for over 100 years. IIWII. You, and other Bolshevik types, are not the arbiters for what millions of people are to believe. I know; crazy, isn't it? ... that people can come to their own beliefs without needing yours nor big brother's input ...
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by ip_law-hokie »

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
IIWII. There is nothing to honor about traitors willing to quit their country over slavery.
Millions have disagreed with you, for over 100 years. IIWII. You, and other Bolshevik types, are not the arbiters for what millions of people are to believe. I know; crazy, isn't it? ... that people can come to their own beliefs without needing yours nor big brother's input ...
Losers don't get to right history Riverguy. the south was the losers.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by RiverguyVT »

But taken individually, those losers ...millions and millions of them...for 150 years... don't turn to you to decide what is worthy of honoring. You don't get to speak for others. Can't make it more plain for you. You say there 'Is nothing to honor"... millions disagreed with you for over 100 years. So, they've honored without your blessings. I personally see a lot worth honoring, and don't need yours, nor the bolsheviks' endorsements nor permissions.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13125
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by HokieJoe »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
IIWII. There is nothing to honor about traitors willing to quit their country over slavery.
Millions have disagreed with you, for over 100 years. IIWII. You, and other Bolshevik types, are not the arbiters for what millions of people are to believe. I know; crazy, isn't it? ... that people can come to their own beliefs without needing yours nor big brother's input ...
Losers don't get to right history Riverguy. the south was the losers.

Uhh, we're not at war, so WTF are you talking about? We're either a nation of laws, or, we're not. That means, no vandalism or violence to achieve one's end. We follow the laws. End of story.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by USN_Hokie »

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
Don't interrupt IP when he's on a roll with talking point word salad.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: The debate over confederate rememberance reaches staunto

Post by USN_Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:At least you call it rememberance.
Questionable use of the word.

Most of these statutes were built in the 1920's to supplement Jim Crow. They have more to do with white power that remembrance of the long defeated confederacy.

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1920s.... so? How do you correlate statues to Jim Crow?
Like saying watermelon sales cause drowning. You know, because when drownings spike, watermelon sales are also spiking.
IIWII. There is nothing to honor about traitors willing to quit their country over slavery.
Millions have disagreed with you, for over 100 years. IIWII. You, and other Bolshevik types, are not the arbiters for what millions of people are to believe. I know; crazy, isn't it? ... that people can come to their own beliefs without needing yours nor big brother's input ...
Losers don't get to right history Riverguy. the south was the losers.
*write.

...though right is ironically correct in a context you probably disagree with.
Post Reply