I'm happy to help out a fellow Hokie. Now, maybe, just maybe the list you were talking about was the CBS News list. But, the CBS list and the HURDAT list are the same. And the reason Camille isn't on that list is because the wind speeds they measured weren't high enough to make the top 5. They took lots of measurements though.USN_Hokie wrote:Kindly cite that, or kindly STFU. I'm not going to tilt at the windmills of your imagination and defend arguments I never made. I've ignored you on this because it only exists in your head.HokieFanDC wrote:You say Camille isn't in HURDAT, and it is.
You said storms like this didn't happen before. That's an assessment of probability (of zero, in the case). Citing this event as evidence AGW is real implies probability is increasing. The truth is that we don't know, so any proclamations based on mis-understandings of probability are worthless.HokieFanDC wrote:We just don't care about it, because staking your butthurt on the fact that there are probably storms that were bigger, but unmeasurable, is silly.
Oftentimes, understanding what we don't know is more useful than accepting what we do know. It's fatal errors like that which lead to stock market and housing crashes, or even Fukushima.
"I just noticed that Camille - one of the worst hurricanes ever - isn't even on their list. Why? Camille was so intense they weren't able to fly into the eye at its peak, and there was such heavy rains they weren't able to get wind readings for several days."
And to your "storms like this didn't happen before", I didn't say that.
I said, specifically, " And in real terms, the people who live along the Atlantic Ocean haven't experienced a hurricane this powerful before (or to be more specific, since at least 1924 when they started measuring them). "
Your welcome. I won't ask you to apologize or to STFU, dealing with your cerebral flatulence and make believe world are just part of the beauty of UWS.