Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election results

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election results

Post by USN_Hokie »

So, which is it? Is she completely mental, or is she just trying to keep the quid pro quo / kick back $$ happy?
I want to get back to the question, would you completely rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election if we learn that the Russian interference in the election is even deeper than we know now?

No. I would not. I would say —

You're not going to rule it out.

No, I wouldn't rule it out.

http://www.npr.org/2017/09/18/551217204 ... -not-naive
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by BigDave »

Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?

The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.

And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by awesome guy »

BigDave wrote:Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?

The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.

And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
I doubt Hillary understands how our elections work.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by USN_Hokie »

"He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy."
- Hillary Clinton
User avatar
Bay_area_Hokie
Posts: 6027
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:53 am
Alma Mater: VT
Party: Surprise Party

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by Bay_area_Hokie »

She is so freaking stupid. Think of all the good people that get cancer, and she's not one of them....
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by USN_Hokie »

Bay_area_Hokie wrote:She is so freaking stupid. Think of all the good people that get cancer, and she's not one of them....
Would that be cancer^2?
User avatar
Major Kong
Posts: 15728
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
Party: Independent
Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by Major Kong »

Like I said below she's at least a bubble and a ½ off plumb.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

Wasn't there a discussion just last week on this board about whether Hillary had accepted the election results? Seems pretty clear that she hasn't. The old bag is really a piece of work.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by cwtcr hokie »

BigDave wrote:Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?

The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.

And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)

it is the idiocy continuing, yes various people put fake stories on facebook and many idiots believed them, but no the election voting itself was not hacked. They are going after Manafort hard to get him to lie about Trump, this will fail also and even if the bogus prosecutor gets Manafort Trump will pardon him. The stupidity in this country gets more frustrating every day
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26378
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res

Post by HokieHam »

:evil:
Attachments
IMG_2713.JPG
IMG_2713.JPG (84.98 KiB) Viewed 1173 times
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Post Reply