I want to get back to the question, would you completely rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election if we learn that the Russian interference in the election is even deeper than we know now?
No. I would not. I would say —
You're not going to rule it out.
No, I wouldn't rule it out.
http://www.npr.org/2017/09/18/551217204 ... -not-naive
Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election results
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election results
So, which is it? Is she completely mental, or is she just trying to keep the quid pro quo / kick back $$ happy?
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?
The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.
And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.
And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
I doubt Hillary understands how our elections work.BigDave wrote:Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?
The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.
And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
"He became the first person, Republican or Democrat, who refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. Now, that is a direct threat to our democracy."
- Hillary Clinton
- Hillary Clinton
- Bay_area_Hokie
- Posts: 6027
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:53 am
- Alma Mater: VT
- Party: Surprise Party
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
She is so freaking stupid. Think of all the good people that get cancer, and she's not one of them....
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
Would that be cancer^2?Bay_area_Hokie wrote:She is so freaking stupid. Think of all the good people that get cancer, and she's not one of them....
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15728
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
Like I said below she's at least a bubble and a ½ off plumb.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
Wasn't there a discussion just last week on this board about whether Hillary had accepted the election results? Seems pretty clear that she hasn't. The old bag is really a piece of work.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
BigDave wrote:Why would Russian interference - unless they physically hacked the vote totals so that Donald Trump did not actually win sufficient votes to give him 270 electors - be a basis for contesting the outcome?
The only basis for challenging the outcome is to say that he didn't actually get 270 electoral votes because he didn't actually win some of the states that he won.
And if that were to happen - say for the sake of argument that there was irrefutable proof that the voting machine results in several states were hacked and that Hillary should have rightly been elected - can you imagine the chaos? Does she think that the court should rule that Trump was never actually President, and that every single action he or his regime has taken is null and void? (Texas v White basically ruled a variation of that - the Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union therefore the secessionist Texas legislature did not actually exist therefore any actions it purported to have taken were null and void.)
it is the idiocy continuing, yes various people put fake stories on facebook and many idiots believed them, but no the election voting itself was not hacked. They are going after Manafort hard to get him to lie about Trump, this will fail also and even if the bogus prosecutor gets Manafort Trump will pardon him. The stupidity in this country gets more frustrating every day
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26378
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Bwahaha: Hillary won't rule out challenging election res
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2713.JPG (84.98 KiB) Viewed 1174 times
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function