TX: Pedo found decapitated outside house of judge...
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:07 pm
Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
Really? Pre trial?awesome guy wrote:Justice served
My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote:My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.ip_law-hokie wrote:You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote:My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?133743Hokie wrote:The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.ip_law-hokie wrote:You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote:My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
Makes sense.Major Kong wrote:It's a hoax.
Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.ip_law-hokie wrote:What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?133743Hokie wrote:The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.ip_law-hokie wrote:You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote:My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK to assume guy is member of murderous cartel; not OK to assume the guy was guilty of the crime for which he was arrested and arraigned. Got it.133743Hokie wrote:Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.ip_law-hokie wrote:What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?133743Hokie wrote:The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.ip_law-hokie wrote:You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote:My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't assuming innocence or guilt as AG was. Just presuming on possible affiliation. But you knew that and were just trying to be contrary.
You're both assuming zi genderip_law-hokie wrote:OK to assume guy is member of murderous cartel; not OK to assume the guy was guilty of the crime for which he was arrested and arraigned. Got it.133743Hokie wrote:Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.ip_law-hokie wrote:What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?133743Hokie wrote:The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.ip_law-hokie wrote:You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?133743Hokie wrote: My guess is he owed the drug cartel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't assuming innocence or guilt as AG was. Just presuming on possible affiliation. But you knew that and were just trying to be contrary.
But it's a moot point. Cap'n post was probably bullshit.