United We Stand - uwsboard.com

...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

I'd say the judge lost his head granting bail in this case, but actually he lost someone else's head instead. I hope the police close this case quickly without further arrests.

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

The moral of the story is: join the Catholic church if you're a Pedo so you get sent to an Italian villa when caught instead of ending up headless on a judge's porch.

Justice served

awesome guy wrote:Justice served

Really? Pre trial?

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

133743Hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.

What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's a hoax.

Major Kong wrote:It's a hoax.

Makes sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.

What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.

I wasn't assuming innocence or guilt as AG was. Just presuming on possible affiliation. But you knew that and were just trying to be contrary.

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:...who gave him bail.

http://www.neonnettles.com/news/2763-pe ... il-hearing

My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.

What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.

I wasn't assuming innocence or guilt as AG was. Just presuming on possible affiliation. But you knew that and were just trying to be contrary.

OK to assume guy is member of murderous cartel; not OK to assume the guy was guilty of the crime for which he was arrested and arraigned. Got it.

But it's a moot point. Cap'n post was probably bullshit.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

133743Hokie wrote: My guess is he owed the drug cartel.

You make this post after criticizing AG for jumping to conclusions?

The cartel doesn't adhere to our system of justice -- innocent until proven guilty. They just cut and run.

What about the part where you assumed the guy was involved in a cartel in the first place?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah, you're being snarky -- I get it. My bad.

I wasn't assuming innocence or guilt as AG was. Just presuming on possible affiliation. But you knew that and were just trying to be contrary.

OK to assume guy is member of murderous cartel; not OK to assume the guy was guilty of the crime for which he was arrested and arraigned. Got it.

But it's a moot point. Cap'n post was probably bullshit.

You're both assuming zi gender