I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun regula
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26659
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People who know, know.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
there are hundreds of laws and regulations and requirements now, what new law would stop a seemingly normal guy from killing people if that person is hell bent on killing people(he had bombs in his car)TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Actually no, it isn't the same. It's one thing for outsiders to demand that an organization make changes, using a crisis to try and make their point. It's another for it to come from within the organization itself. Two completely different things.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26659
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
It's being talked about 4 days after.......the left came out minutes after the shooting. Also, the NRA is being forced to talk about it because of the emotional cries from the leftards. There is a difference.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
"Outsiders" being people that live in this country and are affected by said laws.133743Hokie wrote:Actually no, it isn't the same. It's one thing for outsiders to demand that an organization make changes, using a crisis to try and make their point. It's another for it to come from within the organization itself. Two completely different things.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Regardless, the same organization that convinces their followers it is too soon, now decides it is not too soon. Next time, however, it will be too soon.
People who know, know.
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Ok, they were able to not talk about it after a shooting at an elementary school, but a Vegas shooting is the straw?HokieHam wrote:It's being talked about 4 days after.......the left came out minutes after the shooting. Also, the NRA is being forced to talk about it because of the emotional cries from the leftards. There is a difference.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People who know, know.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.TheH2 wrote:"Outsiders" being people that live in this country and are affected by said laws.133743Hokie wrote:Actually no, it isn't the same. It's one thing for outsiders to demand that an organization make changes, using a crisis to try and make their point. It's another for it to come from within the organization itself. Two completely different things.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Regardless, the same organization that convinces their followers it is too soon, now decides it is not too soon. Next time, however, it will be too soon.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Two completely different incidentsTheH2 wrote:Ok, they were able to not talk about it after a shooting at an elementary school, but a Vegas shooting is the straw?HokieHam wrote:It's being talked about 4 days after.......the left came out minutes after the shooting. Also, the NRA is being forced to talk about it because of the emotional cries from the leftards. There is a difference.TheH2 wrote:Is it also disgusting that the NRA is doing the same?.... It's just "funny" that you hear the line of thinking nationally, and especially on this board, and now the NRA is now talking about potential legislation. So now it's ok to look at gun policy after a tragedy?HokieHam wrote:I'm not a member of the NRA, but it was disgusting how soon the left was trying to not let this crisis go to waste. At least allow the blood to dry on the ground..........TheH2 wrote:Fake news. Remember, it's too soon to talk about gun control. Or is it, it's not the right time to talk about gun control? Regardless, that's despicable for anyone to use a tragedy to try and force gun regulations. I'd imagine member in the NRA are irate over this.ip_law-hokie wrote:NRA Backs Additional Regulations on Rapid-Fire Gun 'Bump Stocks' - NBC News
https://apple.news/A8WbkH_13RUu_oznHZwa3rw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
No, I would prefer that they would not use "too soon" as an excuse to not talk about reform. I'm a little disappointed that the people complaining it's too soon aren't bitching to the NRA that it is too soon. It isn't too soon. It never was too soon. It was just BS from the NRA, followed by their supporters, that served as an excuse to not talk about reform. Hey, how do we paint the opposition in a bad light. Let's say they don't care about the people getting killed and they are just having false outrage over all the children killed at an elementary school to take away your second amendment rights.133743Hokie wrote:
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
People who know, know.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
What gun law change would have prevented Sandy Hook?TheH2 wrote:No, I would prefer that they would not use "too soon" as an excuse to not talk about reform. I'm a little disappointed that the people complaining it's too soon aren't bitching to the NRA that it is too soon. It isn't too soon. It never was too soon. It was just BS from the NRA, followed by their supporters, that served as an excuse to not talk about reform. Hey, how do we paint the opposition in a bad light. Let's say they don't care about the people getting killed and they are just having false outrage over all the children killed at an elementary school to take away your second amendment rights.133743Hokie wrote:
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26659
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Answer......none. That's what these people don't understand and are unwilling to understand.133743Hokie wrote:What gun law change would have prevented Sandy Hook?TheH2 wrote:No, I would prefer that they would not use "too soon" as an excuse to not talk about reform. I'm a little disappointed that the people complaining it's too soon aren't bitching to the NRA that it is too soon. It isn't too soon. It never was too soon. It was just BS from the NRA, followed by their supporters, that served as an excuse to not talk about reform. Hey, how do we paint the opposition in a bad light. Let's say they don't care about the people getting killed and they are just having false outrage over all the children killed at an elementary school to take away your second amendment rights.133743Hokie wrote:
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
Just because a seat belt doesn't save every life doesn't mean it is worthless.133743Hokie wrote:What gun law change would have prevented Sandy Hook?TheH2 wrote:No, I would prefer that they would not use "too soon" as an excuse to not talk about reform. I'm a little disappointed that the people complaining it's too soon aren't bitching to the NRA that it is too soon. It isn't too soon. It never was too soon. It was just BS from the NRA, followed by their supporters, that served as an excuse to not talk about reform. Hey, how do we paint the opposition in a bad light. Let's say they don't care about the people getting killed and they are just having false outrage over all the children killed at an elementary school to take away your second amendment rights.133743Hokie wrote:
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
People who know, know.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
What gun law change will directly save a life?TheH2 wrote:Just because a seat belt doesn't save every life doesn't mean it is worthless.133743Hokie wrote:What gun law change would have prevented Sandy Hook?TheH2 wrote:No, I would prefer that they would not use "too soon" as an excuse to not talk about reform. I'm a little disappointed that the people complaining it's too soon aren't bitching to the NRA that it is too soon. It isn't too soon. It never was too soon. It was just BS from the NRA, followed by their supporters, that served as an excuse to not talk about reform. Hey, how do we paint the opposition in a bad light. Let's say they don't care about the people getting killed and they are just having false outrage over all the children killed at an elementary school to take away your second amendment rights.133743Hokie wrote:
No. Outsiders being people that are not members of the NRA demanding that the NRA support changes.
As for your strawman "too soon, not too soon", would you prefer that the NRA remain adamant, regardless, or that they actually assess issues? They can't win in the eyes of people like you. They are either barbarians or hypocrites.
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
H2 is taking advantage of this situation to bash the NRA. Sad.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: NRA will allow Republicans to consider additional gun re
There must be an article in The Atlantic making such as a case.USN_Hokie wrote:H2 is taking advantage of this situation to bash the NRA. Sad.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.