Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Interrupting our program in progress for this important bulletin:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office. I repeat:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office.
Now, back to our program...
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office. I repeat:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office.
Now, back to our program...
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
What position do you think I'm changing? I'm pretty sure you have it wrong, or you have no clue what you're talking about and you're just white knighting.awesome guy wrote:Is the point in the purse fight where you claim to actually have the opposite position you've argued against the entire time?HokieFanDC wrote:Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.USN_Hokie wrote:This is hilarious. You've been gobsmacked at my suggestion that the State Department needs painful budget cuts, then you pretend to support a 20% cut to their budget at the end of the thread. I'm pretty sure every career bureaucrat in the State Department would consider a 20% budget cut the end of the world....HokieFanDC wrote:Agree for the most part, although the cuts need to go further back than Obama. We're above $50B today, and have been between $20B and $45B for the 20 years prior to Obama, and above $50B since Obama. A good start would be getting below $40B, and then lower if possible.HokieJoe wrote:JFC @this thread. Tillerson isn't on the way out. And yes, the State Department budget needs to be cut. We need to erase every bit of additional bloat that occurred while Odumbo was in office. And that's just to start.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Uh huh. I'll have you down for both cuts and no cuts to the DoS.HokieFanDC wrote:What position do you think I'm changing? I'm pretty sure you have it wrong, or you have no clue what you're talking about and you're just white knighting.awesome guy wrote:Is the point in the purse fight where you claim to actually have the opposite position you've argued against the entire time?HokieFanDC wrote:Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.USN_Hokie wrote:This is hilarious. You've been gobsmacked at my suggestion that the State Department needs painful budget cuts, then you pretend to support a 20% cut to their budget at the end of the thread. I'm pretty sure every career bureaucrat in the State Department would consider a 20% budget cut the end of the world....HokieFanDC wrote:Agree for the most part, although the cuts need to go further back than Obama. We're above $50B today, and have been between $20B and $45B for the 20 years prior to Obama, and above $50B since Obama. A good start would be getting below $40B, and then lower if possible.HokieJoe wrote:JFC @this thread. Tillerson isn't on the way out. And yes, the State Department budget needs to be cut. We need to erase every bit of additional bloat that occurred while Odumbo was in office. And that's just to start.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
HokieFanDC wrote: Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
DC has now pivoted the crux of his argument to the difference between "painful cuts" and "cutting it a lot."
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Yep, you have it wrong.awesome guy wrote:Uh huh. I'll have you down for both cuts and no cuts to the DoS.HokieFanDC wrote:What position do you think I'm changing? I'm pretty sure you have it wrong, or you have no clue what you're talking about and you're just white knighting.awesome guy wrote:Is the point in the purse fight where you claim to actually have the opposite position you've argued against the entire time?HokieFanDC wrote:Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.USN_Hokie wrote:This is hilarious. You've been gobsmacked at my suggestion that the State Department needs painful budget cuts, then you pretend to support a 20% cut to their budget at the end of the thread. I'm pretty sure every career bureaucrat in the State Department would consider a 20% budget cut the end of the world....HokieFanDC wrote: Agree for the most part, although the cuts need to go further back than Obama. We're above $50B today, and have been between $20B and $45B for the 20 years prior to Obama, and above $50B since Obama. A good start would be getting below $40B, and then lower if possible.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
Nowhere have I said that we shouldn't cut the DoS. And of course, I've said we should cut it numerous times.
Here are all my comments on the idea of cutting the DoS. Only a full blown idiot would claim that I have said we shouldn't cut the DoS.
"The grand idea that the dept. should shrink is fine, but not putting an organizational plan in place to make that happen, is pitiful."
“70,000 is a lot. But, what's the right number and where should the cuts be??”
“If you are just saying it can be smaller, I'm cool with that”
In response to this, "I do like your idea for reducing our State Department to be closer to that of a nation whose budget for their equivalent is miniscule compared to ours.", I said this, "Yeh, it's a good idea. Done properly, it could be awesome. Done the way it's being done, ridiculous."
“We've learned that I think the State Dept. has a lot of people, and that it can almost certainly use downsizing.”
“Agree for the most part, although the cuts need to go further back than Obama. We're above $50B today, and have been between $20B and $45B for the 20 years prior to Obama, and above $50B since Obama. A good start would be getting below $40B, and then lower if possible.”
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Seriously, you have no clue what you're talking about.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote: Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
DC has now pivoted the crux of his argument to the difference between "painful cuts" and "cutting it a lot."
This is basic organizational efficiency. If an organization is overstaffed and bloated, there are positions that are not providing real value to the organization. Staffing creep happens all the time in large organizations.
Making cuts to that staffing can be done, and is done all the time, without majorly impacting the goals and duties of the organization. My argument has always been that making the cuts in a haphazard manner, which is what is being done, has a negative impact, ie "painful", and doing it the right way, will not.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Uh huhHokieFanDC wrote:Seriously, you have no clue what you're talking about.USN_Hokie wrote:[emoji38]HokieFanDC wrote: Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
DC has now pivoted the crux of his argument to the difference between "painful cuts" and "cutting it a lot."
This is basic organizational efficiency. If an organization is overstaffed and bloated, there are positions that are not providing real value to the organization. Staffing creep happens all the time in large organizations.
Making cuts to that staffing can be done, and is done all the time, without majorly impacting the goals and duties of the organization. My argument has always been that making the cuts in a haphazard manner, which is what is being done, has a negative impact, ie "painful", and doing it the right way, will not.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
CorrectHokieFanDC wrote:Seriously, you have no clue what you're talking about.USN_Hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote: Yes, hilarious, you're making up shirt again, or you're just too dense to get it.
Nowhere have I said that cutting the state dept. isn't a good idea. And I have no issue with cutting a lot of it.
Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I'm gobsmacked at your continuous misstatement of what I've said numerous times.
Cutting the dept. by 20% doesn't have to be painful if you're cutting the 20% (or whatever the right number is) that is duplicative bloat. It is painful if you make cuts without figuring out what positions are important, which are not, and laying out a plan to cut the latter, and fill the former.
That's my issue, plain and simple. You're the one who, in your typical fashion, can't understand that and continues to make up arguments based on your lack of comprehension.
DC has now pivoted the crux of his argument to the difference between "painful cuts" and "cutting it a lot."
This is basic organizational efficiency. If an organization is overstaffed and bloated, there are positions that are not providing real value to the organization. Staffing creep happens all the time in large organizations.
Making cuts to that staffing can be done, and is done all the time, without majorly impacting the goals and duties of the organization. My argument has always been that making the cuts in a haphazard manner, which is what is being done, has a negative impact, ie "painful", and doing it the right way, will not.
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
[quote="HooFighter"][/quote]
Have you considered counseling for your TDS? You're just not making sense.
Have you considered counseling for your TDS? You're just not making sense.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Putin must have said it’s time to go.HooFighter wrote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
ip_law-hokie wrote:Putin must have said it’s time to go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
More evidence of a stable administration.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
It is 9:30 am, and he's gone!RiverguyVT wrote:Interrupting our program in progress for this important bulletin:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office. I repeat:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office.
Now, back to our program...
Crap!
He was possibly my favorite person in this administration. Tell me we still have Mattis...please!
Mr Toad's Wild Ride continues.
(I was wondering..when Tilleraon learned of Nork stuff in the news)
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Great job of the WH staying on message today. Didn't want anyone talking about the findings from the House "panel" or the visit to California.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
HooFighter wrote:Great job of the WH staying on message today. Didn't want anyone talking about the findings from the House "panel" or the visit to California.
Yeah, that's it.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
I liked Tillerson too. It's been said that Trump was initially going to go with Romney, but the Russians felt more comfortable with Tillerson, having dealt with him at Exxon.RiverguyVT wrote:It is 9:30 am, and he's gone!RiverguyVT wrote:Interrupting our program in progress for this important bulletin:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office. I repeat:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office.
Now, back to our program...
Crap!
He was possibly my favorite person in this administration. Tell me we still have Mattis...please!
Mr Toad's Wild Ride continues.
(I was wondering..when Tilleraon learned of Nork stuff in the news)
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- UpstateSCHokie
- Posts: 11979
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Doesn't bother me. Tillerson didn't really seem like a MAGA guy. As long as Stephen Miller & Mick Mulvaney are there, I'm good.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
UpstateSCHokie wrote:Doesn't bother me. Tillerson didn't really seem like a MAGA guy. As long as Stephen Miller & Mick Mulvaney are there, I'm good.
That might be the scariest thing I've read in the last 2 years.
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
HooFighter wrote:
So, Tillerson is out three months after the original 'report' was reported. Am I to assume that this is supposed to exonerate the original false reports? If so, uhh, good sniffing Deputy Dog?
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
I see what you did there!ip_law-hokie wrote:I liked Tillerson too. It's been said that Trump was initially going to go with Romney, but the Russians felt more comfortable with Tillerson, having dealt with him at Exxon.RiverguyVT wrote:It is 9:30 am, and he's gone!RiverguyVT wrote:Interrupting our program in progress for this important bulletin:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office. I repeat:
It is 12:00 noon and Rex Tilleraon is still in office.
Now, back to our program...
Crap!
He was possibly my favorite person in this administration. Tell me we still have Mattis...please!
Mr Toad's Wild Ride continues.
(I was wondering..when Tilleraon learned of Nork stuff in the news)
I really liked that he isn't a career pol. I liked his resume, his background, and apparent value set
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
The guy is more MAGA than Trump is, IMHO.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Doesn't bother me. Tillerson didn't really seem like a MAGA guy. As long as Stephen Miller & Mick Mulvaney are there, I'm good.
Literally, a Boy Scout
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
So, does this mean Tillerson has gone from being Satan incarnate to being a great guy on all the Soros sites today? Or... must he disavow capitalism first?HooFighter wrote:
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Anybody concerned Tillerson is on the way out.
I think it just means that Donald Trump is a **** moron.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.