Page 1 of 1

Nature is racist

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:13 pm
by awesome guy

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 6:43 pm
by cwtcr hokie
awesome guy wrote:What is wrong with these people?


http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/2 ... -outdoors/
there are no bounds to their stupidity

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:18 pm
by BigDave
And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:25 pm
by cwtcr hokie
BigDave wrote:And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.
you racist!!!

we should take taxpayer dollars to bus them in then of course we would need to build some fast food rest. as not having that is racist and lots of chairs in nature (racist not to have the taxpayers pay to make sure they are comfortable..... and a/c of course, nature can be hot!! (thats racist!!)

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:26 pm
by awesome guy
BigDave wrote:And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.
Nah, it's easier to teach them they're helpless and in need of the government to change things for them. And besides, they're not going to ruin their $400 Air Jordans by wearing them in the woods! That pair of sneakers could finance several trips to the outdoors so calling it poverty isn't really accurate. It's a poverty of decision making. Buying shoes instead of personal enrichment.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:16 pm
by CFB Apologist
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:08 pm
by nolanvt
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:33 pm
by awesome guy
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:33 pm
by RiverguyVT
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here
A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:35 pm
by RiverguyVT
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Being from WV, your tree likely has as many branches as a broom stick

(sorry; couldn't resist. Happy Thanksgiving)

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:36 pm
by awesome guy
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here
A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.
I know about that. The Cherokee are genetically related to jews so the migrated here too in that era. There's no such thing as a native American outside all of us born here being so.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:39 pm
by RiverguyVT

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:39 pm
by 133743Hokie
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everyone came from somewhere. But the US as it is known today was settled by predominantly European immigrants in the 1600s.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:48 pm
by Major Kong
I clicked on the link in the Breitbart article.

The whole thing is laughable

Pitzer College is one of the Claremont Colleges. The tuition is over $50,000 a year. Mr. McCann is suffering from young white mans angst which should be treated as a mental illness...it's caused by long time exposure to academic and parental nittwittery.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:56 pm
by HokieJoe
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here
A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.

Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:59 pm
by awesome guy
HokieJoe wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here
A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.

Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.
It's to create a division and narrative that whites are illegitimate so should give up all that we made to the brown skinned people who've made nothing more sophisticated than a spear or loin cloth.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:05 pm
by 133743Hokie
awesome guy wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here
A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.

Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.
It's to create a division and narrative that whites are illegitimate so should give up all that we made to the brown skinned people who've made nothing more sophisticated than a spear or loin cloth.
Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:26 pm
by Major Kong
133743Hokie wrote:Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.
Great book :!:

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:10 pm
by CFB Apologist
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:53 pm
by 133743Hokie
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.
White Europeans used their privilege in the early 1600s to take over north America, drive the Indians out, and take over. It's evil and wrong that the US even exists.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:11 am
by HokieHam
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.
This was the expected answer from The Unusual.....I could see it coming before I even read his post....

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:04 pm
by USN_Hokie
Major Kong wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.
Great book :!:
I've read it as well. It and "1491" are great counters to Jared Diamond's stupid book.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:09 pm
by USN_Hokie
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.
Inter-generation "justice" (whether it be for blacks/slavery or Indians) is a hot button among liberals.

Re: Nature is racist

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:23 pm
by awesome guy
USN_Hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.
Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.
Inter-generation "justice" (whether it be for blacks/slavery or Indians) is a hot button among liberals.
It's just an excuse to be an intervener and insert themselves in the middle to extract money. Liberals don't really believe in anything but enriching themselves via money and a laughable pretense of moral superiority. They're frauds, like they're all preaching women's rights and demonizing the right as misogynistic. Meanwhile, they're raping women and requiring blow jobs to be part of their liberal media empire. Or when they call the right racists when the left is demanding policies based on race. They're frauds and crooks.