United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:02 am

Time zone: America/New_York


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
What is wrong with these people?


http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/2 ... -outdoors/

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8677
awesome guy wrote:


there are no bounds to their stupidity


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 5450
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican
And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.

_________________
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8677
BigDave wrote:
And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.


you racist!!!

we should take taxpayer dollars to bus them in then of course we would need to build some fast food rest. as not having that is racist and lots of chairs in nature (racist not to have the taxpayers pay to make sure they are comfortable..... and a/c of course, nature can be hot!! (thats racist!!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
BigDave wrote:
And a poor white person in the US isn't going to get to see the Eiffel Tower. I'm not sure what his point is.

Maybe the world would be better if liberals wouldn't just say poor=black and rich=white and that's the way it is, but instead focus on helping poor people (of all races, genders, sexual identities, whatever) improve their lives.


Nah, it's easier to teach them they're helpless and in need of the government to change things for them. And besides, they're not going to ruin their $400 Air Jordans by wearing them in the woods! That pair of sneakers could finance several trips to the outdoors so calling it poverty isn't really accurate. It's a poverty of decision making. Buying shoes instead of personal enrichment.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:27 pm
Posts: 1961
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8739
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9566
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9566
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Being from WV, your tree likely has as many branches as a broom stick

(sorry; couldn't resist. Happy Thanksgiving)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.
I know about that. The Cherokee are genetically related to jews so the migrated here too in that era. There's no such thing as a native American outside all of us born here being so.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9566
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cactus_Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 5817
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everyone came from somewhere. But the US as it is known today was settled by predominantly European immigrants in the 1600s.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:35 pm
Posts: 10002
Location: Macedonian Hacking Campus
Alma Mater: Skopje Technical Hacking and Culinary Institute
Party: Independent
I clicked on the link in the Breitbart article.

The whole thing is laughable

Pitzer College is one of the Claremont Colleges. The tuition is over $50,000 a year. Mr. McCann is suffering from young white mans angst which should be treated as a mental illness...it's caused by long time exposure to academic and parental nittwittery.

_________________
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:12 am
Posts: 5125
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.



Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.

_________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire


"Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat" Karl Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
HokieJoe wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.



Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.
It's to create a division and narrative that whites are illegitimate so should give up all that we made to the brown skinned people who've made nothing more sophisticated than a spear or loin cloth.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 5817
awesome guy wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even the Indians immigrated here

A Virginia Tech soils prof blew previous understandings out of the water. Before, the notion was that man came here first across the Beiring Strait, 5,000 yrs ago.

On the banks of Virginia's Nottoway River, pottery shards closer to 15-12,000 yrs old were found. And guess what. They match EXACTLY shards found in Spain of the same era. Looks like the Euros were here first after all.

Google "Pre Clovis Man Nottoway River" and you should be able to find it. Pretty cool, IMHO.



Interesting stuff. I'm not sure why it's necessary to proclaim we all descended from x place or peoples, when what we think we know changes when new evidence emerges.
It's to create a division and narrative that whites are illegitimate so should give up all that we made to the brown skinned people who've made nothing more sophisticated than a spear or loin cloth.

Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:35 pm
Posts: 10002
Location: Macedonian Hacking Campus
Alma Mater: Skopje Technical Hacking and Culinary Institute
Party: Independent
133743Hokie wrote:
Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.
Great book :!:

_________________
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:27 pm
Posts: 1961
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 5817
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.

White Europeans used their privilege in the early 1600s to take over north America, drive the Indians out, and take over. It's evil and wrong that the US even exists.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5082
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.

This was the expected answer from The Unusual.....I could see it coming before I even read his post....

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 19093
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
Major Kong wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
Read Niall Ferguson's "Civilization: The West and the Rest". As he puts it, "Why, beginning around 1500, did a few small polities on the western end of the Eurasian landmass come to dominate the rest of the world?" It's a great historical read.
Great book :!:


I've read it as well. It and "1491" are great counters to Jared Diamond's stupid book.

_________________
"Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants."
- Gen. Omar Bradley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 19093
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.


Inter-generation "justice" (whether it be for blacks/slavery or Indians) is a hot button among liberals.

_________________
"Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants."
- Gen. Omar Bradley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nature is racist
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 30843
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
USN_Hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
Liberals and racists are starting to play the "native american" card now- in 2017... calling whites "immigrants" and "imperialists", etc. That just shows that their real agenda- and the agenda of this ridiculous article is to hate white people- i.e. racism. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians can walk out into the woods freely in America. Only a low IQ racist would think otherwise.


Is it not accurate to say most of us descended from immigrants? Researching my family history, I sure did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DUH..I get that..that is not the point. There is this theme recently among liberals/guilty alt leftists/minorities - as in some 240 years after white Europeans "settled" America, that whites are -today- these land grabbing, imperialistic, yellow immigrants that are lucky to be here and are evil. It's racist, big time. I was born in America- I am not an immigrant by any definition. Neither was my great great great grandfather or any generation after. I did not take land from Indians or kill them- neither did my great great great grandfather. This 2017 article referring to modern, living whites as imperialists and immigrants because of what happened in 1776 is racist- plain and simple. If you refer to someone that was born in America as an "immigrant" to somehow validate illegal immigration in the name of liberal votes, you are a racist- among your other problems.


Inter-generation "justice" (whether it be for blacks/slavery or Indians) is a hot button among liberals.
It's just an excuse to be an intervener and insert themselves in the middle to extract money. Liberals don't really believe in anything but enriching themselves via money and a laughable pretense of moral superiority. They're frauds, like they're all preaching women's rights and demonizing the right as misogynistic. Meanwhile, they're raping women and requiring blow jobs to be part of their liberal media empire. Or when they call the right racists when the left is demanding policies based on race. They're frauds and crooks.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

Time zone: America/New_York


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Color scheme by ColorizeIt!