United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

Yeh, it's ridiculous, and sad.

There are probably lots of ppl responsible, but personally, I blame LeBron.

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

Roll your eyes all you want, they largely don't put the same energy to get into college that they do to get $400 shoes. There's a racial aspect to that, no matter how uncomfortable it is. It isn't a problem with marketing, it's a problem with the buyers. This was actually a tamer shoe sale, many have shootings along with the pushing. And of course this is happening in food deserts and all the places people say that they're missing opportunity. They can't do something to better themselves, but can burn hundreds on shoes. That's the core problem, putting the wrong things into the top priority. A book would change their life more than a pair of shoes and it's 1/10th the cost.

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

LOL. You're a goon.

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

so the news report is racist? Nothing AG posted was racist....its called reality. You probably think a bunch of white rednecks are killing all the black folks in chicago

cwtcr hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

so the news report is racist? Nothing AG posted was racist....its called reality. You probably think a bunch of white rednecks are killing all the black folks in chicago

you've had a bad day. you should probably hang it up for the evening, go have a beer, pet your horses, and come back fresh tomorrow.

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

HvilleHokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

so the news report is racist? Nothing AG posted was racist....its called reality. You probably think a bunch of white rednecks are killing all the black folks in chicago

you've had a bad day. you should probably hang it up for the evening, go have a beer, pet your horses, and come back fresh tomorrow.

His church should vote on it, read the Book of Seeking Banation of those you disagree with.

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

I have no idea what you're trying to say

My point being...there was more than one race represented at the Nike thing in carytown, your generalization notwithstanding

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

I have no idea what you're trying to say

My point being...there was more than one race represented at the Nike thing in carytown, your generalization notwithstanding

That's my point, same ratio of blacks and whites as are in the NBA.

And my broader generalization holds, blacks aren't putting this type of energy into self betterment, which would give them all they claim they want the government to give them. I'm holding onto them voting for liberal socialists 90-95% of the time as proof of wanting enrichment from the government.

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

You're a fool that just comes here to cry about others. No one cares about your whinning.

HvilleHokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

so the news report is racist? Nothing AG posted was racist....its called reality. You probably think a bunch of white rednecks are killing all the black folks in chicago

you've had a bad day. you should probably hang it up for the evening, go have a beer, pet your horses, and come back fresh tomorrow.

No my day has been fine, you never add anything to the conversation so that is why nobody cares what you say. have a good day pancaker

awesome guy wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

You're a fool that just comes here to cry about others. No one cares about your whinning.

Personally, I think this forum should be open to all, including white nationalists.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

You're a fool that just comes here to cry about others. No one cares about your whinning.

Personally, I think this forum should be open to all, including white nationalists.

Agreed. Let the racists show who they are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nolanvt wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote: you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

You're a fool that just comes here to cry about others. No one cares about your whinning.

Personally, I think this forum should be open to all, including white nationalists.

Agreed. Let the racists show who they are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

Agry to disagry.
BigDave isn't a censor

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

I have no idea what you're trying to say

My point being...there was more than one race represented at the Nike thing in carytown, your generalization notwithstanding

That's my point, same ratio of blacks and whites as are in the NBA.

And my broader generalization holds, blacks aren't putting this type of energy into self betterment, which would give them all they claim they want the government to give them. I'm holding onto them voting for liberal socialists 90-95% of the time as proof of wanting enrichment from the government.

You're just ranting racist nonsense now...

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

I have no idea what you're trying to say

My point being...there was more than one race represented at the Nike thing in carytown, your generalization notwithstanding

That's my point, same ratio of blacks and whites as are in the NBA.

And my broader generalization holds, blacks aren't putting this type of energy into self betterment, which would give them all they claim they want the government to give them. I'm holding onto them voting for liberal socialists 90-95% of the time as proof of wanting enrichment from the government.

You're just ranting racist nonsense now...

Swing and a miss Ace.

I'm surprised this is even debated. Uncomfortable? yes. Debatable? Not really. Even Will-I-Am has said so much in regards to Obama. He said black people are sitting on their rear waiting for Superman to come in and save them. They thought Obama was Superman and he wasn't. They need to realize Superman isn't coming, it's up to them to do the things necessary to better themselves as only the individual can better themself. Will-I-am gets it and he's done great for himself. Same thing here, a lot of those people obviously could have spent that money on better things than shoes. Same ones have smart phones and PlayStations while claiming poverty and need for food stamps. Their month of eating is on their feet or in their hand.

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

BigDave wrote:(eye roll at the subject line for obvious reasons)

Opponents of Nike's marketing strategy claim that 1200 people die every year in shoe-related violence.[http://abc13.com/archive/9368193/]

Those numbers seem high ... but ...

If every school shooting demands that we ban guns, why aren't we banning these sneaker marketing campaigns, or at least requiring that Nike be held accountable for providing adequate security?

I honestly don't understand why people are so obsessed with shoes ... but when you have these things going for tens of thousands of dollars on eBay and you tell poor people - REGARDLESS OF RACE - that their chance to make $10k of easy money is to go buy these shoes and flip them, the results are predictable.

you are complicit in his racism by continuing to allow him to post his dreck here.

Oh good grief
So, was BigDave complicit in any number of other whack job posts?

C'mon

first off, I agree that awesome-o's posts are whack job posts.

second, no, he's not complicit in one-off whackos who post here. but when there is a single poster who is by and far the most active, and regularly posts overt racism, then yes, bigdave is complicit by letting him continue to post his racism here.

Agry to disagry.
BigDave isn't a censor

Correct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Just kidding, they're fighting over tennis shoes. Nikes of course, the rich taste of the disenfranchised.


http://m.nbc12.com/story/36894202/rare- ... owdy-crowd

So...you sure it was just blacks?

NBA representation.

I have no idea what you're trying to say

My point being...there was more than one race represented at the Nike thing in carytown, your generalization notwithstanding

That's my point, same ratio of blacks and whites as are in the NBA.

And my broader generalization holds, blacks aren't putting this type of energy into self betterment, which would give them all they claim they want the government to give them. I'm holding onto them voting for liberal socialists 90-95% of the time as proof of wanting enrichment from the government.

You're just ranting racist nonsense now...

[emoji375][emoji375]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk