RiverguyVT wrote:
Well, some of us don't conflate questions of revenues with questions of expenses, either.
However you want to justify it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure what you think I'm justifying... but okay.
That's IP's femine side, a gap in funding always means you need to make more, not spend less. Unless it's pizza of course!
You guys talk a lot about cutting spending. . . .
Yep. That's what a smart person does when you can't live on 3t a year.
So what the hold-up? You have both houses of Congress and the White House.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Not sure what you think I'm justifying... but okay.
That's IP's femine side, a gap in funding always means you need to make more, not spend less. Unless it's pizza of course!
You guys talk a lot about cutting spending. . . .
Yep. That's what a smart person does when you can't live on 3t a year.
So what the hold-up? You have both houses of Congress and the White House.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Can't pass a full, clean budget without 60 votes in the senate. Schumer won't allow any democrat to vote for any spending cut except in military.