United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

They must think this is the path to defeating Trump since "Russian collusion" has backfired.

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

The problem I have is simple, it has not been proven other than a dumb picture that was harmless that he did anything. And it appears the only thing you need to do to get someone fired or driven from society is to accuse them of some sex issue..... no proof is needed. This is a supremely stupid slope we are careening down.

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

Dems 2018 slogan: "We Take Out Our Garbage!" (I'm plagiarizing)

cwtcr hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

The problem I have is simple, it has not been proven other than a dumb picture that was harmless that he did anything. And it appears the only thing you need to do to get someone fired or driven from society is to accuse them of some sex issue..... no proof is needed. This is a supremely stupid slope we are careening down.

I'm fine with it as long as democrats are being pushed over it. They're well past paying the bill for sleazy behavior.

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

They have to.. they have backed themselves in the corner as the "Anti-Trump" at all costs- and to them that means anti "grab em by the pussy" etc. They have flat called Trump a child rapist. They HAVE to be anti-Franken, else look like huge hypocrites

As I opined re Conyers...there must be a LOT MORE that we don't know about.

AG said it correctly, socialists only act out of self interest.

From what I know, Franken is a boorish, crude hypocrite. If I were in the Senate based on what we know now, I would not vote to expel him.

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

CFB Apologist wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

They have to.. they have backed themselves in the corner as the "Anti-Trump" at all costs- and to them that means anti "grab em by the pussy" etc. They have flat called Trump a child rapist. They HAVE to be anti-Franken, else look like huge hypocrites

That's never stopped them before. This is different, they're typically the party of circling the wagon.

We don’t know what they know. He might have a rep as a real freak.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bay_area_Hokie wrote:We don’t know what they know. He might have a rep as a real freak.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that's part of it, they all know what Conyers and the other perverts do. They're complicit in their hostile government environment.

Took them long enough. They were hoping this would go away......

The photo on the military plane might be the tip of the iceberg. He could have his own Lewinsky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cwtcr hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:Shocked, really. Good on the Dems. I never thought I'd see the day that they would do something like this...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3635 ... -to-resign

The problem I have is simple, it has not been proven other than a dumb picture that was harmless that he did anything. And it appears the only thing you need to do to get someone fired or driven from society is to accuse them of some sex issue..... no proof is needed. This is a supremely stupid slope we are careening down.

LOL

You mean "not proven other than a photograph of him doing it, which proves it"

Harmless? So now you get to decide for the victim, for another person, what should or should not be a trespass upon their physical being? It's harmless, so your wife, daughter, sister, and mom should have no problem with men grabbing their tits as they sleep. Right? And if they do have a problem with that, you can tell them it didn't matter..that it was harmless. Don't go full knucklehead on this.

Y'all should find a clip of Newt yesterday, on Laura Ingram's show. He nailed it. The left has lost its (their) mind(s).