Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Yep. Is he trying to influence or undermine the Trump administrations policies in India? If so, we need a special prosecutor.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Jon Gruden is available.133743Hokie wrote:Yep. Is he trying to influence or undermine the Trump administrations policies in India? If so, we need a special prosecutor.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Addressing your first point:HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Addressing the second: *Reads Logan act* Nope, don't see the India exemption!
Clearly, you don't understand the legislation. Hopefully we can all find common ground there.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
I'm wondering where he's going with this myself. My money is on "Brown people couldn't possibly influence US policy".awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
It's Russia!USN_Hokie wrote:I'm wondering where he's going with this myself. My money is on "Brown people couldn't possibly influence US policy".awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
You have a horrible memory, on subjects you want to ignore.USN_Hokie wrote:Addressing your first point:HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Addressing the second: *Reads Logan act* Nope, don't see the India exemption!
Clearly, you don't understand the legislation. Hopefully we can all find common ground there.
"I don't think he should be indicted on what he did"
http://www.uwsboard.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 75#p208342
I also said this, "meaning that I don't think Flynn should have been charged with a violation."
Your smiley face is just your symbol for "I'm FOS".
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
All it takes is a "dispute", right Legal Beagle for Google University? And then 0 contact from any American.HokieFanDC wrote:Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
You're babbling and should have just quit after you called me an idiot, and then brought up sanctions that ended 16 years ago as proof. The text of the Logan Act uses the term dispute. I don't know every disagreement that falls under that term, but sanctions certainly are. And no, it's not zero Americans (you made that up), it's Americans not authorized by the government to negotiate the "dispute ".awesome guy wrote:All it takes is a "dispute", right Legal Beagle for Google University? And then 0 contact from any American.HokieFanDC wrote:Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:
You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
LOL, I'm the only coherent one here in mocking your absurd legal opinion. Just admit that you're FOS, it's what you're saying without saying it.HokieFanDC wrote:You're babbling and should have just quit after you called me an idiot, and then brought up sanctions that ended 16 years ago as proof. The text of the Logan Act uses the term dispute. I don't know every disagreement that falls under that term, but sanctions certainly are. And no, it's not zero Americans (you made that up), it's Americans not authorized by the government to negotiate the "dispute ".awesome guy wrote:All it takes is a "dispute", right Legal Beagle for Google University? And then 0 contact from any American.HokieFanDC wrote:Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.awesome guy wrote:
You're a complete fool on this, no idea what you're talking about. Tell us Dipshit, what's the difference between Russia and India in regards to the Logan Act. And give us your laughable interpretation of it again, for laughs of course.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
What legal opinion do you disagree with? And what is wrong with it?awesome guy wrote:LOL, I'm the only coherent one here in mocking your absurd legal opinion. Just admit that you're FOS, it's what you're saying without saying it.HokieFanDC wrote:You're babbling and should have just quit after you called me an idiot, and then brought up sanctions that ended 16 years ago as proof. The text of the Logan Act uses the term dispute. I don't know every disagreement that falls under that term, but sanctions certainly are. And no, it's not zero Americans (you made that up), it's Americans not authorized by the government to negotiate the "dispute ".awesome guy wrote:All it takes is a "dispute", right Legal Beagle for Google University? And then 0 contact from any American.HokieFanDC wrote:Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.HokieFanDC wrote:
We went through this in a previous thread and you assured me you understood.
But, unlike USN, I can actually explain what I mean, because I'm not making it up.
Here is the pertinent text, "foreign governments having a dispute with the United States."
And the key word is dispute. The existence of sanctions on Russia is the difference. Your welcome.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
That should be obvious.HokieFanDC wrote:What legal opinion do you disagree with? And what is wrong with it?awesome guy wrote:LOL, I'm the only coherent one here in mocking your absurd legal opinion. Just admit that you're FOS, it's what you're saying without saying it.HokieFanDC wrote:You're babbling and should have just quit after you called me an idiot, and then brought up sanctions that ended 16 years ago as proof. The text of the Logan Act uses the term dispute. I don't know every disagreement that falls under that term, but sanctions certainly are. And no, it's not zero Americans (you made that up), it's Americans not authorized by the government to negotiate the "dispute ".awesome guy wrote:All it takes is a "dispute", right Legal Beagle for Google University? And then 0 contact from any American.HokieFanDC wrote:Holy derptard Batman. 2001 called and wants it's India sanctions reinstated.awesome guy wrote:LOL, you're a grade A idiot. Sanctions aren't a proxy for sanctions. We have sanctions against many nations anyway, including India for their nuclear tests. Make up another poorly thought out argument as this one is poorly thought out.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30317
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Good grief, with the name-calling.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30317
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Worst violation of the Logan Act I can think of is John Kerry, the North Vietnamese, in Paris
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
My memory is just fine, thanks. I'm making fun of your assertion that Flynn was in violation of the Logan Act - but then, you knew that.HokieFanDC wrote:You have a horrible memory, on subjects you want to ignore.USN_Hokie wrote:Addressing your first point:HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Addressing the second: *Reads Logan act* Nope, don't see the India exemption!
Clearly, you don't understand the legislation. Hopefully we can all find common ground there.
"I don't think he should be indicted on what he did"
http://www.uwsboard.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 75#p208342
I also said this, "meaning that I don't think Flynn should have been charged with a violation."
Your smiley face is just your symbol for "I'm FOS".
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
That or Ted *huccup* Kennedy. DC doesn't get upset over those because his television doesn't tell him to.RiverguyVT wrote:Worst violation of the Logan Act I can think of is John Kerry, the North Vietnamese, in Paris
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
You used the word prosecution, I just assumed you meant what you wrote.USN_Hokie wrote:My memory is just fine, thanks. I'm making fun of your assertion that Flynn was in violation of the Logan Act - but then, you knew that.HokieFanDC wrote:You have a horrible memory, on subjects you want to ignore.USN_Hokie wrote:Addressing your first point:HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Addressing the second: *Reads Logan act* Nope, don't see the India exemption!
Clearly, you don't understand the legislation. Hopefully we can all find common ground there.
"I don't think he should be indicted on what he did"
http://www.uwsboard.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 75#p208342
I also said this, "meaning that I don't think Flynn should have been charged with a violation."
Your smiley face is just your symbol for "I'm FOS".
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
Your logic would also require me to think you were a federal prosecutor.HokieFanDC wrote: You used the word prosecution, I just assumed you meant what you wrote.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
And yet, you can't put it into words.awesome guy wrote:That should be obvious.HokieFanDC wrote:What legal opinion do you disagree with? And what is wrong with it?awesome guy wrote:LOL, I'm the only coherent one here in mocking your absurd legal opinion. Just admit that you're FOS, it's what you're saying without saying it.HokieFanDC wrote:
You're babbling and should have just quit after you called me an idiot, and then brought up sanctions that ended 16 years ago as proof. The text of the Logan Act uses the term dispute. I don't know every disagreement that falls under that term, but sanctions certainly are. And no, it's not zero Americans (you made that up), it's Americans not authorized by the government to negotiate the "dispute ".
The only thing that's obvious is that in your last attempt to tell me what was wrong, your evidence was sanctions that were lifted 16 years ago. I'll remain skeptical until you can provide something even remotely relevant.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Another Logan Act violation for DC to prosecute...
He started off claiming it's illegal for a US citizen to talk with a foreign government. Google searches keep morphing and shifting his misunderstanding of this.USN_Hokie wrote:My memory is just fine, thanks. I'm making fun of your assertion that Flynn was in violation of the Logan Act - but then, you knew that.HokieFanDC wrote:You have a horrible memory, on subjects you want to ignore.USN_Hokie wrote:Addressing your first point: [emoji38]HokieFanDC wrote:Thanks for the shout out! And for the Cap'n Bullshirt 2 for 1. First, I said that I didn't think Flynn should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, multiple times.USN_Hokie wrote:
Second, you put yourself firmly in the group of dimwits who can't understand the key distinction between Russia and India, with regard to the Logan Act.
Addressing the second: *Reads Logan act* Nope, don't see the India exemption!
Clearly, you don't understand the legislation. Hopefully we can all find common ground there.
"I don't think he should be indicted on what he did"
http://www.uwsboard.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 75#p208342
I also said this, "meaning that I don't think Flynn should have been charged with a violation."
Your smiley face is just your symbol for "I'm FOS".
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.