washingon redhawks?! really?

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by 133743Hokie »

Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by ip_law-hokie »

??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
Major Kong
Posts: 15726
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
Party: Independent
Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by Major Kong »

The University of Miami can't be happy. :mrgreen:
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image
HokieFanDC
Posts: 18547
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by HokieFanDC »

ip_law-hokie wrote:??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clever hoax.

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/12/washing ... x-redhawks
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by cwtcr hokie »

133743Hokie wrote:Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
fake news
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by 133743Hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
fake news
Duh. Again, is Snyder going to go ballistic over this and go after who did it?
CFB Apologist
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by CFB Apologist »

133743Hokie wrote:Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
The ONE thing I admire Dan Snyder about is his stance on this name change. He is not changing the name, and doesn't give a rats ass about PC or cuck water cooler dems that scream for it to be changed. He is not backing down, and I admire him for that.
BG Hokie
Posts: 2449
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:34 pm

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by BG Hokie »

CFB Apologist wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
The ONE thing I admire Dan Snyder about is his stance on this name change. He is not changing the name, and doesn't give a rats ass about PC or cuck water cooler dems that scream for it to be changed. He is not backing down, and I admire him for that.
Yes, very admirable to defend your net worth. He'd take a huge hit if a name change occurred.
CFB Apologist
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: washingon redhawks?! really?

Post by CFB Apologist »

BG Hokie wrote:
CFB Apologist wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Is someone gonna get fried over this? Danny boy can't be happy
The ONE thing I admire Dan Snyder about is his stance on this name change. He is not changing the name, and doesn't give a rats ass about PC or cuck water cooler dems that scream for it to be changed. He is not backing down, and I admire him for that.
Yes, very admirable to defend your net worth. He'd take a huge hit if a name change occurred.
Funny..people have argued the opposite. A name change means (potentially) new colors and certainly new hats, jerseys, t shirts, branding deals, etc etc etc. The Wizards made a boatload of cash when changing from the Bullets- at least initially. and if they change the name, cucks like Mike Wise and Chris Collinsworth might actually buy a t shirt or say /print the name- which could mean more money in the long run. Snyder was a multi millionaire before he owned the team- I don't think this is financially motivated, so much as he doesn't want to be bossed around by a bunch of feminine offended white guys.
Post Reply