Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
TheH2
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm

Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by TheH2 »

Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
People who know, know.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by awesome guy »

Apparently some forgeries are more important than others.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by cwtcr hokie »

TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
TheH2
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by TheH2 »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
People who know, know.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by RiverguyVT »

TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
I think the Clinton Foundation is a non profit :lol: :lol:
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by awesome guy »

TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
They reported a forged yearbook as fact so aren't really innocent or creditable.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by 133743Hokie »

TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
Schumer's was pretty clear in that he could readily provide evidence that he wasn't where the accusations said he was. Cut and dry. Not so easy with other types of he said she said accusations.
TheH2
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by TheH2 »

133743Hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
Schumer's was pretty clear in that he could readily provide evidence that he wasn't where the accusations said he was. Cut and dry. Not so easy with other types of he said she said accusations.
It's the details that make these hold up, multiple people with similar stories that add up, etc. That's what makes something credible. Again, see Washington Post. They published stories that held up, and didn't publish stories that did not.
People who know, know.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by cwtcr hokie »

TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
seriously dude, yes some are very easy, something that occurred supposedly 4 decades ago, get effing real. Please answer the question, how do you prove something did not occur when it involves only an accusation where no one else was around? Do you document every movement you make every minute of the day, I sure don't
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by cwtcr hokie »

TheH2 wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
Schumer's was pretty clear in that he could readily provide evidence that he wasn't where the accusations said he was. Cut and dry. Not so easy with other types of he said she said accusations.
It's the details that make these hold up, multiple people with similar stories that add up, etc. That's what makes something credible. Again, see Washington Post. They published stories that held up, and didn't publish stories that did not.

So people don't fabricate details, again, you have to prove it did not happen and many of those details cannot be not proven.... get it?

If you are this naive you better hope nobody every comes after you, say a person that wants your job. A woman that wants you and you do not want her...etc etc
User avatar
Major Kong
Posts: 15726
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
Party: Independent
Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by Major Kong »

Are you sure using the phrase going down is appropriate :?: :mrgreen:
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image
TheH2
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by TheH2 »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
Schumer's was pretty clear in that he could readily provide evidence that he wasn't where the accusations said he was. Cut and dry. Not so easy with other types of he said she said accusations.
It's the details that make these hold up, multiple people with similar stories that add up, etc. That's what makes something credible. Again, see Washington Post. They published stories that held up, and didn't publish stories that did not.

So people don't fabricate details, again, you have to prove it did not happen and many of those details cannot be not proven.... get it?

If you are this naive you better hope nobody every comes after you, say a person that wants your job. A woman that wants you and you do not want her...etc etc
Fabricated stories aren't consistent. It's all in the details.
People who know, know.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by RiverguyVT »

Major Kong wrote:Are you sure using the phrase going down is appropriate :?: :mrgreen:
I thought the same...LOL
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by awesome guy »

TheH2 wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).
How exactly do you prove that something did not happen if it was 4 decades ago or nobody else was around when it allegedly happened? It does not matter though, at this point we are at the point of if an accusation is made it is to be believed 100% even if there is no evidence other than the accusation itself....really stupid, but that is where we are at
We aren't. We already had the Washington post refuse to publish a fake story, and here is Chuck Schumer, providing evidence that it was fabricated.

Two concrete examples contradicting your false beliefs.

I think it's great to be skeptical, but you are starting with the assumption that, for example, the company is not looking into the allegations before taking action. This has also been proven false in the two most recent examples, Matt Lauer, and NFL Network.
Schumer's was pretty clear in that he could readily provide evidence that he wasn't where the accusations said he was. Cut and dry. Not so easy with other types of he said she said accusations.
It's the details that make these hold up, multiple people with similar stories that add up, etc. That's what makes something credible. Again, see Washington Post. They published stories that held up, and didn't publish stories that did not.
Nope. They published a fake story about Moore touching a 14 year old. Fake news.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
UpstateSCHokie
Posts: 11907
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by UpstateSCHokie »

TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).

What, you mean the WaPo is skeptical of allegations against Democrats? Whoop-tee-doo. News at 11.
Image

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
TheH2
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by TheH2 »

UpstateSCHokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).

What, you mean the WaPo is skeptical of allegations against Democrats? Whoop-tee-doo. News at 11.
Yeah, and that's why they published the fake story from Veritas about Moore. Make sure you keep me updated about the basement of a pizza place. That's where the real news is!
People who know, know.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by awesome guy »

TheH2 wrote:
UpstateSCHokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).

What, you mean the WaPo is skeptical of allegations against Democrats? Whoop-tee-doo. News at 11.
Yeah, and that's why they published the fake story from Veritas about Moore. Make sure you keep me updated about the basement of a pizza place. That's where the real news is!
They did publish a fake story about Moore...
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
TheH2 wrote:
UpstateSCHokie wrote:
TheH2 wrote:Oh, nevermind, it was a fake attack to try and get him fired. As with the Washington Post uncovering the fake story about Roy Moore, the accused can prove their innocence.

The accusers, whoever they are, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Maybe they get community service at some non-profit (is Veritas non-profit...?).

What, you mean the WaPo is skeptical of allegations against Democrats? Whoop-tee-doo. News at 11.
Yeah, and that's why they published the fake story from Veritas about Moore. Make sure you keep me updated about the basement of a pizza place. That's where the real news is!
They did publish a fake story about Moore...
You still butt hurt about the GOP losing a seat in Alabama? [emoji13]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
hawk1965
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed May 11, 2016 9:09 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: democrat

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by hawk1965 »

Help me out here.You nut jobs are so all over the place in defense of Russia,King Donald,the weather is
just fine,etc.,I have trouble figuring what the crap you are saying.
Now the new watch word of the hour is "fake news".A true Russia implant as has ever been invented.
But I have wandered off subject.Are you really defending that butt wipe Moore?The question should not be did he do it,but why the hell did 600,000+ voters in Alabama still vote for him.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by RiverguyVT »

hawk1965 wrote:Help me out here.You nut jobs are so all over the place in defense of Russia,King Donald,the weather is
just fine,etc.,I have trouble figuring what the crap you are saying.
Now the new watch word of the hour is "fake news".A true Russia implant as has ever been invented.
But I have wandered off subject.Are you really defending that butt wipe Moore?The question should not be did he do it,but why the hell did 600,000+ voters in Alabama still vote for him.
I have trouble figuring what the crap you are saying.- and the crowd says, "Noooo, really?"

But I have wandered off subject. I wish we saw more of you here, I really do.

Are you really defending that butt wipe Moore?- I'm not; have you ever defended either butt wipe Clinton? Either the one who laughed about a 12 year old rape victim (the victim was asking for it, I tell you!) or the one who took advantage of a girl much younger than himself than was the age difference between Moore and any of his accusers... have ya?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

The same reason 65.8MM voted for Hillary. Some people don’t believe they support a flawed candidate.
hawk1965 wrote:Help me out here.You nut jobs are so all over the place in defense of Russia,King Donald,the weather is
just fine,etc.,I have trouble figuring what the crap you are saying.
Now the new watch word of the hour is "fake news".A true Russia implant as has ever been invented.
But I have wandered off subject.Are you really defending that butt wipe Moore?The question should not be did he do it,but why the hell did 600,000+ voters in Alabama still vote for him.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Chuck Schumer going down for sexual assualt

Post by HokieJoe »

TheH2 wrote:So people don't fabricate details, again, you have to prove it did not happen and many of those details cannot be not proven.... get it?

Fabricated stories aren't consistent. It's all in the details.

Yeah, not buying that details are always the great equalizer in these scenarios. Often, the negative PR alone is enough to hurt someone's career.

I think strict confidentiality should be required in all harassment allegations. If it is ascertained that someone is guilty of stated allegations, then and only then shall information be released. That would eliminate a lot of superficial claims.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Post Reply