United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:44 pm

Time zone: America/New_York


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:25 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31357
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.


They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...


You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."


No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you're still on Ruuuuuuusa?

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9960
The 1980s called and wants its foreign policy back... yeah?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 19434
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.


They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...


You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."


No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Better start chilling the ice pack.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10205
Location: New York, NY
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.


They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...


You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."


No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Better start chilling the ice pack.


OK.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9960
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:12 am
Posts: 5209
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.


They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...


You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Why would he? Obama and Axelrod loved the Russians. Oh, and they were very flexible.

_________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire


"Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat" Karl Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:05 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:25 pm
Posts: 367
Alma Mater: VT
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


He'll be back, you can't keep Hokie great Steve Bannon down for long.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9960
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10205
Location: New York, NY
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


Has Bannon denied making the "treasonous" statement? Or the statements about JK and his greasy excrement? He's walked them back, but I don't believe he's denied making them.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:21 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8842
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:43 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8842
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.


1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.


It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:08 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8842
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:

It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.


That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.


please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:23 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure


What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:45 pm
Posts: 1769
Location: NC
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure


What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

:lol: :lol:
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:01 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8654
miles wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:

Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure


What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

:lol: :lol:
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.


The next time I tell you how the dossier should be taken as gospel, will be the first time I've said that.
You should let the savvy posters, and the not so savvy posters, handle all things related to this board, because you are clueless about 100% of what happens here.

Happy New Years!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:34 pm
Posts: 1966
miles wrote:
I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.


I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:34 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31357
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
BG Hokie wrote:
miles wrote:
I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.


I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.


That's a genetic trait. You just outed your family as having a small set of jewels.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 9960
BG Hokie wrote:
miles wrote:
I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.


I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.


I’d call that a faulty conclusion. One has nothing to do with the other. Miles saying he’d leave it to others to track down old archived posts doesn’t in any way mean he cannot himself. It means exactly what he said...that he’d leave it to others. Motive is assumed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 8850
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
Sloppy Steve is apparently out at Breitbart. No choice really. Can’t have that joke associated with your brand after Trump dunked on him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8842
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:

please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it


Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??


yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure


What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?


from the remarks I have seen those are his opinions, I have no idea of knowing what Bannon beleives or not


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Time zone: America/New_York


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: