Page 7 of 8

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:25 am
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...
You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."
No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you're still on Ruuuuuuusa?

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:31 am
by RiverguyVT
The 1980s called and wants its foreign policy back... yeah?

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:37 am
by USN_Hokie
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...
You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."
No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Better start chilling the ice pack.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:06 am
by ip_law-hokie
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...
You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."
No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.

Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Better start chilling the ice pack.
OK.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 2:09 pm
by RiverguyVT
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:40 pm
by HokieJoe
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...
You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would he? Obama and Axelrod loved the Russians. Oh, and they were very flexible.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:05 pm
by HokieFanDC
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:40 pm
by FireFuente
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
He'll be back, you can't keep Hokie great Steve Bannon down for long.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:59 pm
by RiverguyVT
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:16 pm
by ip_law-hokie
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
Has Bannon denied making the "treasonous" statement? Or the statements about JK and his greasy excrement? He's walked them back, but I don't believe he's denied making them.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:21 pm
by HokieFanDC
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:33 pm
by cwtcr hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:43 pm
by HokieFanDC
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:14 pm
by cwtcr hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.

2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:08 pm
by HokieFanDC
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:14 pm
by cwtcr hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.

As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:23 pm
by HokieFanDC
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure
What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:55 pm
by miles
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure
What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
:lol: :lol:
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:01 am
by HokieFanDC
miles wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure
What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
:lol: :lol:
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
The next time I tell you how the dossier should be taken as gospel, will be the first time I've said that.
You should let the savvy posters, and the not so savvy posters, handle all things related to this board, because you are clueless about 100% of what happens here.

Happy New Years!!!

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:53 am
by BG Hokie
miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:34 am
by awesome guy
BG Hokie wrote:
miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.
That's a genetic trait. You just outed your family as having a small set of jewels.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:40 am
by RiverguyVT
BG Hokie wrote:
miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.
I’d call that a faulty conclusion. One has nothing to do with the other. Miles saying he’d leave it to others to track down old archived posts doesn’t in any way mean he cannot himself. It means exactly what he said...that he’d leave it to others. Motive is assumed.

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:13 pm
by nolanvt
Sloppy Steve is apparently out at Breitbart. No choice really. Can’t have that joke associated with your brand after Trump dunked on him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:19 pm
by cwtcr hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn it
Where did I say I believed everything?

Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sure
What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
from the remarks I have seen those are his opinions, I have no idea of knowing what Bannon beleives or not

Re: Bannon in the headlines again.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 2:14 am
by nolanvt
Seeing that Sloppy Steve is going to meet with Mueller. [emoji848]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk