She'd turn out the minority vote like crazy. Obama showed that's a winning strategy for Dems.awesome guy wrote:She's more qualified than Obama was and would be just as disastrous. She even had more sense than Obama as she left Rev Wight's Blame Whitey church long before Obama realized how it looked. I think she's just as racist as Obama, just has better sense about masking it. She would be awful and could win provided she can handle the belittling attacks. She'll also be running against success and seen as Obama 2.0 which will kill her odds.CFB Apologist wrote:Yep- another mascot candidate, like Obama. I think she would beat Trump if the dems come out and vote.USN_Hokie wrote:Part of me is laughing, the other part is praying she doesn't run.
Oprah
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Independent
Re: Oprah
Last edited by ElbertoHokie on Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Oprah
I've had enough of the celebrity President. I think I'd take Pence over Oprah.BG Hokie wrote:Has Trump ushered in the new era of politics? Famous people are what the people will elect, because, well, they're already famous and we know and adore them?
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Independent
Re: Oprah
In the USA? Yes.BG Hokie wrote:Has Trump ushered in the new era of politics? Famous people are what the people will elect, because, well, they're already famous and we know and adore them?
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
At least for populists.
-
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:06 am
- Alma Mater: Penn State
Re: Oprah
From Ben Shapiro's site:
Top 5 Oprah Fails
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25542/to ... n-saavedra
"Where was the Hollywood Press Association that was receiving such plaudits at the hands of Oprah Winfrey, again, a woman who was good friends with Harvey Weinstein, being cheered by Meryl Streep, a woman who gave a standing ovation to Roman Polanski?"
The media used the 75th Golden Globe Awards on Sunday as a platform to launch Oprah Winfrey into the national discussion regarding a possible presidential run in 2020. As The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro told Fox News on Monday, Oprah may be popular right now, but if she enters the political arena she will see an immediate hit to her popularity, which could affect her very differently than it did Donald Trump.
As Shapiro noted, Winfrey is a hardcore leftist and her image is based on being a uniter, not a divider — which would take a huge hit if she got political. There is an abundant amount of information available on Oprah which will be used against her if she decides to run for office.
=======================
Ben's take on Oprah's speech:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25504/op ... en-shapiro
On Sunday evening, Oprah Winfrey received the Cecille B. DeMille Lifetime Achievement Award. She proceeded to launch into an emotional speech about the power of women to fight back against sexism and sexual malfeasance — a speech that led to widespread celebration in Hollywood, where everyone knew about the problem of sexual harassment and assault and nobody did anything for years, but where one speech from the most powerful woman in the history of media can apparently cure all ills.
=================================
Actual victims weren't invited on stage
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25569/we ... ly-zanotti
They are responsible for taking down perhaps one of the most powerful men in the entertainment industry, and without them, the #MeToo movement might have completely fizzled like so many modern feminist social media efforts. But Rose McGowan and Asia Argento say that they haven't been asked to join the super-woke Hollywood women's movement to end sexual harassment and violence.
Writing on Twitter, both McGowan and Argento said they weren't invited to accompany the "Times Up" actresses on the red carpet, although A-listers like Reese Witherspoon and Meryl Street brought social justice warriors — and even the "leader" of the #MeToo movement — as their guests.
Top 5 Oprah Fails
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25542/to ... n-saavedra
"Where was the Hollywood Press Association that was receiving such plaudits at the hands of Oprah Winfrey, again, a woman who was good friends with Harvey Weinstein, being cheered by Meryl Streep, a woman who gave a standing ovation to Roman Polanski?"
The media used the 75th Golden Globe Awards on Sunday as a platform to launch Oprah Winfrey into the national discussion regarding a possible presidential run in 2020. As The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro told Fox News on Monday, Oprah may be popular right now, but if she enters the political arena she will see an immediate hit to her popularity, which could affect her very differently than it did Donald Trump.
As Shapiro noted, Winfrey is a hardcore leftist and her image is based on being a uniter, not a divider — which would take a huge hit if she got political. There is an abundant amount of information available on Oprah which will be used against her if she decides to run for office.
=======================
Ben's take on Oprah's speech:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25504/op ... en-shapiro
On Sunday evening, Oprah Winfrey received the Cecille B. DeMille Lifetime Achievement Award. She proceeded to launch into an emotional speech about the power of women to fight back against sexism and sexual malfeasance — a speech that led to widespread celebration in Hollywood, where everyone knew about the problem of sexual harassment and assault and nobody did anything for years, but where one speech from the most powerful woman in the history of media can apparently cure all ills.
=================================
Actual victims weren't invited on stage
https://www.dailywire.com/news/25569/we ... ly-zanotti
They are responsible for taking down perhaps one of the most powerful men in the entertainment industry, and without them, the #MeToo movement might have completely fizzled like so many modern feminist social media efforts. But Rose McGowan and Asia Argento say that they haven't been asked to join the super-woke Hollywood women's movement to end sexual harassment and violence.
Writing on Twitter, both McGowan and Argento said they weren't invited to accompany the "Times Up" actresses on the red carpet, although A-listers like Reese Witherspoon and Meryl Street brought social justice warriors — and even the "leader" of the #MeToo movement — as their guests.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
Re: Oprah
Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
Re: Oprah
I used to love Pop Tarts.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote:Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
Re: Oprah
You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote:Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
-
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:06 am
- Alma Mater: Penn State
Re: Oprah
http://therightscoop.com/excellent-mark ... en-globes/
Mark Levin opened his radio show tonight discussing the speech Oprah that apparently rocked the liberal world last night, the one that the media can’t quit talking about today.
But the speech didn’t rock Levin’s world – in fact he called the speech grotesque and he explains why below:
Mark Levin opened his radio show tonight discussing the speech Oprah that apparently rocked the liberal world last night, the one that the media can’t quit talking about today.
But the speech didn’t rock Levin’s world – in fact he called the speech grotesque and he explains why below:
-
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:25 pm
- Alma Mater: VT
Re: Oprah
Yep, hate to say it but Oprah would win EASILY.ElbertoHokie wrote:She'd turn out the minority vote like crazy. Obama showed that's a winning strategy for Dems.awesome guy wrote:She's more qualified than Obama was and would be just as disastrous. She even had more sense than Obama as she left Rev Wight's Blame Whitey church long before Obama realized how it looked. I think she's just as racist as Obama, just has better sense about masking it. She would be awful and could win provided she can handle the belittling attacks. She'll also be running against success and seen as Obama 2.0 which will kill her odds.CFB Apologist wrote:Yep- another mascot candidate, like Obama. I think she would beat Trump if the dems come out and vote.USN_Hokie wrote:Part of me is laughing, the other part is praying she doesn't run.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30320
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Oprah
Disagry.FireFuente wrote:Yep, hate to say it but Oprah would win EASILY.ElbertoHokie wrote:She'd turn out the minority vote like crazy. Obama showed that's a winning strategy for Dems.awesome guy wrote:She's more qualified than Obama was and would be just as disastrous. She even had more sense than Obama as she left Rev Wight's Blame Whitey church long before Obama realized how it looked. I think she's just as racist as Obama, just has better sense about masking it. She would be awful and could win provided she can handle the belittling attacks. She'll also be running against success and seen as Obama 2.0 which will kill her odds.CFB Apologist wrote:Yep- another mascot candidate, like Obama. I think she would beat Trump if the dems come out and vote.USN_Hokie wrote:Part of me is laughing, the other part is praying she doesn't run.
She wouldn’t make it through the meat grinder...she’s too private.
Nor would she give up her interests & $$ & lifestyle.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Oprah
the awesome deal with Oprah as prez would be free weight watchers for all, you fat ass get to lose weight, you fat ass get to lose weight....yippeeee
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote:You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote:Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote:Yes.BG Hokie wrote:
Isn't Oprah sort of a conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer?
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Oprah
When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote:You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote:Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:This young go-getter used to love Oprah.USN_Hokie wrote: Yes.
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30320
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Oprah
My first google hit is a mother Jones article disparaging her for being anti-vac. Are they RWNJs too?There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
Surely, you can imagine that Oprah does not have to be Jenny M herself, to promote Jenny M's agenda, no? Promoting that nonsense by having her as a guest, and promoting Jenny M's book can't be discarded offhand, DC. C'mon, man.
It also fits her "alar-style" nut jobbery w the beef industry. She's a rich woman's Maury Povich, moving her brainwashed masses to bypass cancer treatments, and setting up a child abuse factory in South Africa.
Her 15 minutes of prez campaign are up. The gal is a damaged LIV LWNJ
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Oprah
RW Vox calls out Oprah's junk science too! Ermagod!
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/ ... udoscience
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/ ... udoscience
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote:You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote:Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.HokieFanDC wrote:
This young go-getter used to love Oprah.
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Oprah
It's always easy bringing information to your low info ecosystem. The first results are all from lefty sites, a normal person would have caught that up front.HokieFanDC wrote:I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote:You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.USN_Hokie wrote: Don't see anything wrong with what he said, not sure what your point is supposed to be. I'm sure Jenny McCarthy is nice too.
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
LOL. The only one that had addl info was the MJ article, which was published this morning.awesome guy wrote:It's always easy bringing information to your low info ecosystem. The first results are all from lefty sites, a normal person would have caught that up front.HokieFanDC wrote:I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote:You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....HokieFanDC wrote:
Just picked the last post, nothing to do with vaxx. Just a comment from POTUS about his future opposition.
If you want me to say something directly about that post, I'll say that I don't see anything that supports that she is anti-vaxx, other than having McCarthy on her show once, and on that show, reading the CDC statement that said they have found no association between vaccines and autism.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
No worries, unlike you, and yes I'm being condescending, when I get new info, I acknowledge it. You run away like the girl child you are.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Oprah
You're so full of excrement. You deny and obfuscate or argue over verb tense. Or act like a bitch, like here, and ignore the dozens of other articles with the same message.HokieFanDC wrote:LOL. The only one that had addl info was the MJ article, which was published this morning.awesome guy wrote:It's always easy bringing information to your low info ecosystem. The first results are all from lefty sites, a normal person would have caught that up front.HokieFanDC wrote:I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.USN_Hokie wrote: You want us to believe the UWS Googler can't find a link? C'mon....
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
No worries, unlike you, and yes I'm being condescending, when I get new info, I acknowledge it. You run away like the girl child you are.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Oprah
I didn't ignore them, I read them, and none of them had the addl info the MJ article had. I said thanks for the addl info, and of course, you being the amazing gentleman you are, couldn't accept that thanks.awesome guy wrote:You're so full of excrement. You deny and obfuscate or argue over verb tense. Or act like a bitch, like here, and ignore the dozens of other articles with the same message.HokieFanDC wrote:LOL. The only one that had addl info was the MJ article, which was published this morning.awesome guy wrote:It's always easy bringing information to your low info ecosystem. The first results are all from lefty sites, a normal person would have caught that up front.HokieFanDC wrote:I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.HokieFanDC wrote:
There are lots of links that claim Oprah is anti-vaxx, and all of them point to McCarthy being on Oprah's show.
None of them have anything else. No worries, the claim sounded like RW LIV dipshirtery, and of course, it is.
Feel free to prove me wrong.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/look- ... le/2645282
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
No worries, unlike you, and yes I'm being condescending, when I get new info, I acknowledge it. You run away like the girl child you are.
I still have no idea what you guys are talking about with verb tense. What is it that you keep bringing up and occupies so much of your mindshare?
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Oprah
Come on, vox and the rest have the same information. It's really pathetic how you try and twist the regular occurrence of you being wrong into me really being wrong or with blame. Beta to the max.HokieFanDC wrote:I didn't ignore them, I read them, and none of them had the addl info the MJ article had. I said thanks for the addl info, and of course, you being the amazing gentleman you are, couldn't accept that thanks.awesome guy wrote:You're so full of excrement. You deny and obfuscate or argue over verb tense. Or act like a bitch, like here, and ignore the dozens of other articles with the same message.HokieFanDC wrote:LOL. The only one that had addl info was the MJ article, which was published this morning.awesome guy wrote:It's always easy bringing information to your low info ecosystem. The first results are all from lefty sites, a normal person would have caught that up front.HokieFanDC wrote:I wasn't being condescending, I didn't get a Mother Jones article at all.awesome guy wrote:When will you learn? When you get condescending then you're always about to get embarrassed. Quibble away, I'm sure Mother Jones is now a RW site and they have more than McCarthy being on her show.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... doscience/
You found one, thanks. Looks like it's deeper than what I found. The Mother Jones article was created 8 hours ago.
See how easy that was?
This is how normal people act. I understand how you find it confusing.
No worries, unlike you, and yes I'm being condescending, when I get new info, I acknowledge it. You run away like the girl child you are.
I still have no idea what you guys are talking about with verb tense. What is it that you keep bringing up and occupies so much of your mindshare?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.