It’s rather beta.USN_Hokie wrote:If you want to bicker over word choice that's fine, but my point was clear.ip_law-hokie wrote:Not to question your use of language, but why do people feel the need to write what they are not doing, just before writing the thing that they write that they are not doing.USN_Hokie wrote:Not downplaying her accomplishment...but has any of her success occurred outside of her television show persona? Serious question, I don't know. If her success is a (mostly) one trick pony and paying smart people to invest the one trick pony $, that would certainly be less impressive. Do you seriously think Oprah could stand up and talk about finance, trade, and business like Trump or Bloomberg?BG Hokie wrote:She has built her own business empire worth $3 billion. Why is that different from Trump building a business empire worth $3 billion? I'd argue, because she was born poor and he was born in an affluent family, that her feat is much more impressive and worthy using your own limited criteria. Why is her $3 billion business empire not as impressive as his? I'm sure you have great logic, just explain it to us.cwtcr hokie wrote:what companies has she run successfully beside her production company which was based off her own show. She became wealthy by being a tv talk show host for a long timeBG Hokie wrote: Oprah was born poor and has built a business empire near the same net worth as Donald Trump. How exactly is she "not near the track record of Trump."?
Don't get me wrong, I don't think she's a good candidate but I sure as crap don't think Donald Trump is either.
if that is the determiner we should run david letterman
I don't think she runs because she has a very, very controlled image which would be utterly destroyed if she had to be questioned or debate someone regarding politics.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk