$130,000

[awesome guy]

How does writing a personal check violate campaign finance laws? Just curious.

Does the pathological lying ever bother the Trump supporter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did the "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" lie ever bother you?

I have my same doctor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're dodging the question.

I’m dodging the question used to dodge the question by answering it?

And I think most can see a difference in being wrong about what will happen in the future, and telling bold-faced, undeniable lies about past events. After a while, I would think that I was being played as a fool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama told bold faced lies about what happened and what he knew would happen. They were also about important policy and abuse of power issues making them significant.

[ip_law-hokie]

Does the pathological lying ever bother the Trump supporter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did the "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" lie ever bother you?

I have my same doctor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're dodging the question.

I’m dodging the question used to dodge the question by answering it?

And I think most can see a difference in being wrong about what will happen in the future, and telling bold-faced, undeniable lies about past events. After a while, I would think that I was being played as a fool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama told bold faced lies about what happened and what he knew would happen. They were also about important policy and abuse of power issues making them significant.

OK. Trump is the president now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Did the "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" lie ever bother you?

I have my same doctor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're dodging the question.

I’m dodging the question used to dodge the question by answering it?

And I think most can see a difference in being wrong about what will happen in the future, and telling bold-faced, undeniable lies about past events. After a while, I would think that I was being played as a fool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama told bold faced lies about what happened and what he knew would happen. They were also about important policy and abuse of power issues making them significant.

OK. Trump is the president now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep. And you're chasing a 12 year old story.

[ip_law-hokie]

I have my same doctor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're dodging the question.

I’m dodging the question used to dodge the question by answering it?

And I think most can see a difference in being wrong about what will happen in the future, and telling bold-faced, undeniable lies about past events. After a while, I would think that I was being played as a fool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama told bold faced lies about what happened and what he knew would happen. They were also about important policy and abuse of power issues making them significant.

OK. Trump is the president now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep. And you're chasing a 12 year old story.

Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HokieHam]

Morning, UWS. Today, let’s not talk about how Rudy corroborated Stormy Daniels’ account and how his client probably violated campaign finance law. Now, let’s go have ourselves a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How does writing a personal check violate campaign finance laws? Just curious.

Does the pathological lying ever bother the Trump supporter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, his lying bothers me as much as other politicians and prior presidents does/did? But again, what has he done that is illegal? Because he's crass does that mean he's held to a higher standard? What are the rules?

This. There are two sets of rules. It’s blatantly obvious.

Trump is what he is. He was elected.....and it stunned the putrid left. And now they are acting like the full blown hand wringers and crying bitches they are. I’m surprised Trump isn’t fighting back harder. He should fire Sessions, Rosenstein and a few others and investigate the hell out of the weaponizing of parts of the government for political purposes. For fun, he should fire Mueller.

[nolanvt]

It’s smart of Trump to go ahead and admit the affair like he did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

It’s smart of Trump to go ahead and admit the affair like he did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’ll have to link a story or quote where Trump admits to an affair.

[HokieHam]

It’s smart of Trump to go ahead and admit the affair like he did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’ll have to link a story or quote where Trump admits to an affair.

Nolan be Nolan-Ing.

All of a sudden, the (D)umbs are concerned about consensual sex.


Two. Sets. Of. Rules.

[nolanvt]

It’s smart of Trump to go ahead and admit the affair like he did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’ll have to link a story or quote where Trump admits to an affair.

Nolan be Nolan-Ing.

All of a sudden, the (D)umbs are concerned about consensual sex.


Two. Sets. Of. Rules.

I have no problem from a legal perspective with Trump’s affair with a porn star.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

It’s smart of Trump to go ahead and admit the affair like he did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’ll have to link a story or quote where Trump admits to an affair.

Nolan be Nolan-Ing.

All of a sudden, the (D)umbs are concerned about consensual sex.


Two. Sets. Of. Rules.

I have no problem from a legal perspective with Trump’s affair with a porn star.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No. You said Trump admitted to an affair. Where? When? Let’s see it.
Else, you’re just moralizing on a hypothetical.

[HokieFanDC]

Morning, UWS. Today, let’s not talk about how Rudy corroborated Stormy Daniels’ account and how his client probably violated campaign finance law. Now, let’s go have ourselves a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How does writing a personal check violate campaign finance laws? Just curious.

Does the pathological lying ever bother the Trump supporter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, his lying bothers me as much as other politicians and prior presidents does/did? But again, what has he done that is illegal? Because he's crass does that mean he's held to a higher standard? What are the rules?

This. There are two sets of rules. It’s blatantly obvious.

Trump is what he is. He was elected.....and it stunned the putrid left. And now they are acting like the full blown hand wringers and crying bitches they are. I’m surprised Trump isn’t fighting back harder. He should fire Sessions, Rosenstein and a few others and investigate the hell out of the weaponizing of parts of the government for political purposes. For fun, he should fire Mueller.

There are many sets of rules, but at least 3 sets at this point. Those on the left that don't care about Obama/Hillary actions at all, lying to the public, email issues, taking money, etc. Those who support Trump all-in despite his constant lying and crap-ass behavior.
And those who don't support the douchey behavior of Trump but are pretty sure that Trump himself didn't do anything wrong with regard to Russia, and support his general agenda and want him to be successful in pushing much of it forward.

I'm sure there's another group or two, but that's the main groups as I see it.

[Techmomof2]

$850,000, Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.

Other allegations of sexual misconduct and rape, Willey, Broaddrick, plus more going back to college while Hillary claimed she was a champion of women unless the perp was her husband in which case she tried to destroy the women.

Many Presidents and Congressmen have had affairs that previously, the media has protected until they were weaponized politically. Equal treatment for all, please.

It's all selective outrage so who really cares?

What I care about is a Bill that probably won't pass stating that Congress must pay for their honeys on the side with their own money instead of a taxpayer-funded slush fund.

[awesome guy]

$850,000, Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.

Other allegations of sexual misconduct and rape, Willey, Broaddrick, plus more going back to college while Hillary claimed she was a champion of women unless the perp was her husband in which case she tried to destroy the women.

Many Presidents and Congressmen have had affairs that previously, the media has protected until they were weaponized politically. Equal treatment for all, please.

It's all selective outrage so who really cares?

What I care about is a Bill that probably won't pass stating that Congress must pay for their honeys on the side with their own money instead of a taxpayer-funded slush fund.

Daniels getting only 130k tells me nothing happened. That's go away money, not "you got me" money.

[RiverguyVT]

$850,000, Bill Clinton paid to Paula Jones.

Other allegations of sexual misconduct and rape, Willey, Broaddrick, plus more going back to college while Hillary claimed she was a champion of women unless the perp was her husband in which case she tried to destroy the women.

Many Presidents and Congressmen have had affairs that previously, the media has protected until they were weaponized politically. Equal treatment for all, please.

It's all selective outrage so who really cares?

What I care about is a Bill that probably won't pass stating that Congress must pay for their honeys on the side with their own money instead of a taxpayer-funded slush fund.

Daniels getting only 130k tells me nothing happened. That's go away money, not "you got me" money.

I could see that.

[133743Hokie]

Morning, UWS. Today, let’s not talk about how Rudy corroborated Stormy Daniels’ account and how his client probably violated campaign finance law. Now, let’s go have ourselves a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How does writing a personal check violate campaign finance laws? Just curious.

Does the pathological lying ever bother the Trump supporter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sure!
I see myself as less of a Trump supporter (hey, let’s be honest here...the guy is weird, at best; crazy at worst) than a supporter of the body politic that will move the ball in an ideologically conservative direction. I like advance of ideas, not people. Nation of laws, not men, and all that Jazz. Thus, I’m pulling for trump to be successful in most of his efforts; I’m not pulling for trump to be lionized.

This, I think, is where left and right diverge. Left likes their rulers, no matter what. The right is quicker to jettison someone on ideology. This dovetails into the thinking vs feeling dichotomy between left right.

People will let me down almost every time. Ideas, rarely.

Spot on