"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
I have a former VT roommate who is often the “stud” in these things. He is the craziest guy I have ever met and living with him senior year at VT was insane. If I just would have videoed that year, I could have invented reality tv.
Amway, he often bangs women while their husbands watch. He said he just answers ads on Craigslist. He said sometimes the guys jerk off, sometimes they just watch. I am sure he will be murdered one day. He said this thing goes on in Nova a lot. Typical lib town [emoji23]
The couples who engage in this are crazy to put it mildly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
CFB Apologist wrote:
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
CFB Apologist wrote:
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
ip_law-hokie wrote:
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
awesome guy wrote:You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would you call that weak to accept a relationship on those terms?
awesome guy wrote:You can't be serious. Only time that would be acceptable is if the man can't get it up.
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How about these guys?
I have no idea what I just witnessed, but it sucked.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Sure I am. Mind you I don’t have the mentality to ever condone it. But if you did, and loved the person, I wouldn’t call you mentally weak. That’s all.
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're defining weakness.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would you call that weak to accept a relationship on those terms?
I personally would consider it weak, yes. Still wouldn’t call it weak minded. Anybody who can mentally process and compartmentalize having someone bone the lady you also bone has a stronger mental capability than I possess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would you call that weak to accept a relationship on those terms?
I personally would consider it weak, yes. Still wouldn’t call it weak minded. Anybody who can mentally process and compartmentalize having someone bone the lady you also bone has a stronger mental capability than I possess.
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The mentally ill and weak do, yes. The mentally strong don't get married or don't tolerate their wives banging random dudes. THAT's the point.
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nah, weak.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’ll only go insofar as to say that given a choice between your lady (a) having an affair and not telling you and (b) having sex in your presence, I would pick (b) (if those were the only two choices).
I also don’t think this discussion applies to truly open marriages, which although somewhat mythical, have their own considerations. I don’t consider that guy to be a cuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd tell her to F off.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Probably a semantical debate, but I don’t think it would be easy. I’d think about it all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not semantics, anyone accepting that is weak minded. They're afraid of losing the girl and not meeting another one. They're the definition of weak minded.
Maybe some are. Maybe some like it and prefer it that way. Beats me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would you call that weak to accept a relationship on those terms?
I personally would consider it weak, yes. Still wouldn’t call it weak minded. Anybody who can mentally process and compartmentalize having someone bone the lady you also bone has a stronger mental capability than I possess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean they're a bigger pussy than you.
Maybe.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
"This fantasy has been around as long as marriage and sexuality," said Ley, whose book "Insatiable Wives" addresses cuckolding in heterosexual couples. "But we're hearing more and more about it these days, and more people are rejecting the social stigma against this fantasy."
LOL- yes men just love to watch their wives bang a 20 year old guy. It's healthy. This is where the lack of morals in the US really shows. Trannys and cuckholding are excused and "normal" /mainstream
Some obviously do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you read the study this CNN article is based off of? It's a study of gay men:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
If they love the person, I wouldn’t say mentally weak.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. They don't, that's the point. It's basically a rape fantasy triggered by a horrible childhood and probably mommy issues.
2. Nobody who loves a spouse asks about bringing another person into the relationship and no relationship was ever saved by bringing another person into it.
CNN: Cuckolding can be positive for some couples
riiiight... 
