United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:15 pm

Time zone: America/New_York


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8979
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Really? Butthead?

I know, I know. Porter is the victim of the media, and the judge that issued a protective order against him.


Has he been convicted, he could be an abuser, as far as I know he has not been arrested or charged for anything, it is again accusations. The POINT being that per the MSM it is a HUGE story that some aide in the WH abused his ex-wives. The point being it is not a big story, do you ask potential hires if they beat up their spouses? I have never asked anyone that. Meanwhile we have lots of evidence of illegal and unethical acts from Obummer and thunder thighs.....crickets

FYI, my wife had two black eyes last year, if she posted a picture I would sure as hell look like I hit the crap out of her. What happened was she was leaning down feeding one of the boarder horses and the sucker jerked his head up very fast and whacked her right in her forehead and nose, about knocked her out. All I heard was the scream. So, no I do not know wether the aide beat either of his ex wives.


If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


If true then yes, he assaulted someone and yes assaulting another human is not good, we agree


I think it goes beyond “not good” but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Where does "not good" lie on the scale of good to bad?

Discuss among yourselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10593
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Foundation In "Russian Uranium Dominance Strategy"

[quote]Undercover FBI informant William Campbell has given written testimony to Congressional investigators after an "iron clad" gag order was lifted in October
Campbell was a highly valued CIA and FBI asset deeply embedded in the Russian nuclear industry while Robert Mueller was the Director of the FBI
Campbell was required by the Russians, under threat, to launder large sums of money - which allowed the FBI to uncover a massive Russian "nuclear money laundering apparatus"
He collected over 5,000 documents and briefs over a six year period, some of which detail efforts by Moscow to route money to the Clinton Foundation
Campbell claims to have video evidence of bribe money related to the Uranium One deal being stuffed into suitcases.
The Obama FBI knew about the bribery scheme, yet the administration still approved the Uranium One deal.
To thank him for his service, Campbell was paid $51,000 by FBI officials at a 2016 celebration dinner in Chrystal City
When it emerged that Campbell had evidence against the Clinton Foundation, a Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff (of FISA warrant application fame) slammed Campbell as a "disaster" potential witness


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-08/fbi-informant-testifies-moscow-routed-millions-clinton-foundation-russian-uranium


But but but some aide in the White House is being accused of being a butthead to his ex-wives and was blackmailed by the RUSSIANS!!!!


Really? Butthead?

I know, I know. Porter is the victim of the media, and the judge that issued a protective order against him.


Has he been convicted, he could be an abuser, as far as I know he has not been arrested or charged for anything, it is again accusations. The POINT being that per the MSM it is a HUGE story that some aide in the WH abused his ex-wives. The point being it is not a big story, do you ask potential hires if they beat up their spouses? I have never asked anyone that. Meanwhile we have lots of evidence of illegal and unethical acts from Obummer and thunder thighs.....crickets

FYI, my wife had two black eyes last year, if she posted a picture I would sure as hell look like I hit the crap out of her. What happened was she was leaning down feeding one of the boarder horses and the sucker jerked his head up very fast and whacked her right in her forehead and nose, about knocked her out. All I heard was the scream. So, no I do not know wether the aide beat either of his ex wives.


If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


If true then yes, he assaulted someone and yes assaulting another human is not good, we agree[/quote]

I think it goes beyond “not good” but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Look at the title of the thread....get it?[/quote]

Yes. Your post that brings Porter into this is rather irrelevant to the initial title thread. I get that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10593
Location: New York, NY
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Really? Butthead?

I know, I know. Porter is the victim of the media, and the judge that issued a protective order against him.


Has he been convicted, he could be an abuser, as far as I know he has not been arrested or charged for anything, it is again accusations. The POINT being that per the MSM it is a HUGE story that some aide in the WH abused his ex-wives. The point being it is not a big story, do you ask potential hires if they beat up their spouses? I have never asked anyone that. Meanwhile we have lots of evidence of illegal and unethical acts from Obummer and thunder thighs.....crickets

FYI, my wife had two black eyes last year, if she posted a picture I would sure as hell look like I hit the crap out of her. What happened was she was leaning down feeding one of the boarder horses and the sucker jerked his head up very fast and whacked her right in her forehead and nose, about knocked her out. All I heard was the scream. So, no I do not know wether the aide beat either of his ex wives.


If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


If true then yes, he assaulted someone and yes assaulting another human is not good, we agree


I think it goes beyond “not good” but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Where does "not good" lie on the scale of good to bad?

Discuss among yourselves.


From running over a protestor (good) to steeling a gently used knee brace (bad), I'm hoping it trends more toward the knee brace heist.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9195
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Really? Butthead?

I know, I know. Porter is the victim of the media, and the judge that issued a protective order against him.


Has he been convicted, he could be an abuser, as far as I know he has not been arrested or charged for anything, it is again accusations. The POINT being that per the MSM it is a HUGE story that some aide in the WH abused his ex-wives. The point being it is not a big story, do you ask potential hires if they beat up their spouses? I have never asked anyone that. Meanwhile we have lots of evidence of illegal and unethical acts from Obummer and thunder thighs.....crickets

FYI, my wife had two black eyes last year, if she posted a picture I would sure as hell look like I hit the crap out of her. What happened was she was leaning down feeding one of the boarder horses and the sucker jerked his head up very fast and whacked her right in her forehead and nose, about knocked her out. All I heard was the scream. So, no I do not know wether the aide beat either of his ex wives.


If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


If true then yes, he assaulted someone and yes assaulting another human is not good, we agree


I think it goes beyond “not good” but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Where does "not good" lie on the scale of good to bad?

Discuss among yourselves.


where does alleged = convicted
discuss among yourselves


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:12 am
Posts: 5279
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

_________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire


"Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat" Karl Marx


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10593
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
[quote="HokieFanDC"]
Really? Butthead?

I know, I know. Porter is the victim of the media, and the judge that issued a protective order against him.


Has he been convicted, he could be an abuser, as far as I know he has not been arrested or charged for anything, it is again accusations. The POINT being that per the MSM it is a HUGE story that some aide in the WH abused his ex-wives. The point being it is not a big story, do you ask potential hires if they beat up their spouses? I have never asked anyone that. Meanwhile we have lots of evidence of illegal and unethical acts from Obummer and thunder thighs.....crickets

FYI, my wife had two black eyes last year, if she posted a picture I would sure as hell look like I hit the crap out of her. What happened was she was leaning down feeding one of the boarder horses and the sucker jerked his head up very fast and whacked her right in her forehead and nose, about knocked her out. All I heard was the scream. So, no I do not know wether the aide beat either of his ex wives.


If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


If true then yes, he assaulted someone and yes assaulting another human is not good, we agree


I think it goes beyond “not good” but I’m happy with the progress that we’ve made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Where does "not good" lie on the scale of good to bad?

Discuss among yourselves.


where does alleged = convicted
discuss among yourselves[/quote]

If I may, cwtcr, I'd like to offer my insight here as there appears to be a communication break down.

DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you refer to Porter "being a butthead," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5538
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9195
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?


thread got hijacked by my comment on the MSM reporting


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5538
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?


thread got hijacked by my comment on the MSM reporting

You threw out the squirrel.......then it went nutz.

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10593
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?


thread got hijacked by my comment on the MSM reporting


The after-the-fact substantive editing of posts was a nice touch though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8979
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9195
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


and she was almost our prez, and you are freaking out about an aide in the WH that does not get along with his former spouses (again, I have no idea how the fights went, if you do, great)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10593
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


and she was almost our prez, and you are freaking out about an aide in the WH that does not get along with his former spouses (again, I have no idea how the fights went, if you do, great)


DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you say that Porter "does not get along with his former spouses," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8979
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


and she was almost our prez, and you are freaking out about an aide in the WH that does not get along with his former spouses (again, I have no idea how the fights went, if you do, great)


cwtr: all Olympic coaches are sex deviants

cwtr: Despite the photos, court order, and no security clearance, I’ll wait for conclusive evidence on the WH official.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8979
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


and she was almost our prez, and you are freaking out about an aide in the WH that does not get along with his former spouses (again, I have no idea how the fights went, if you do, great)


DC and Hoo understand that there are allegations. But those allegations are very serious. When you say that Porter "does not get along with his former spouses," you are minimizing the seriousness of those allegations.


bot


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9195
HokieFanDC wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.


and she was almost our prez, and you are freaking out about an aide in the WH that does not get along with his former spouses (again, I have no idea how the fights went, if you do, great)


cwtr: all Olympic coaches are sex deviants

cwtr: Despite the photos, court order, and no security clearance, I’ll wait for conclusive evidence on the WH official.


I have seen one photo, no info on how it occurred or when, if you got all the info spill the beans bud.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:16 am
Posts: 1968
Party: all the time
Image

_________________
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5538
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
HooFighter wrote:
Image

Says the guy who believed pissgate.

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5538
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.

Yeah. This is actual testimony that is pretty damning if he has all the evidence.

I’m tired of these people skating. With everything swirling around this and the corruption at the FBI and DOJ.........these people are more concerned about a douche hitting his girlfriends/wives compared to something that if proven true, means we have abandoned rule of law for certain individuals.

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 8979
HokieHam wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.

Yeah. This is actual testimony that is pretty damning if he has all the evidence.

I’m tired of these people skating. With everything swirling around this and the corruption at the FBI and DOJ.........these people are more concerned about a douche hitting his girlfriends/wives compared to something that if proven true, means we have abandoned rule of law for certain individuals.


It's not an either/or. Unless you're a partisan lemming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 19961
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
You guys sure let Hoof derail this thread. But, since it's ruined...

Question for hoof: Would you approve of this guy beating his wife if she was a Republican? You've previously endorsed assault on people you disagree with politically, and I'm sure you're interested in being consistent.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:50 am
Posts: 5538
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
WTF does any of this have to do with the veracity of the claims made in the OP?

Yeah......amazing how that happens.


The news about bribery, money laundering, donations to Clintons, and Russian interference, is several months old.

The Clintons suck, no one here says they don't.

Yeah. This is actual testimony that is pretty damning if he has all the evidence.

I’m tired of these people skating. With everything swirling around this and the corruption at the FBI and DOJ.........these people are more concerned about a douche hitting his girlfriends/wives compared to something that if proven true, means we have abandoned rule of law for certain individuals.


It's not an either/or. Unless you're a partisan lemming.

Uh.......tell me who is skating on the Pub side?

_________________
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:16 am
Posts: 1968
Party: all the time
USN_Hokie wrote:
You guys sure let Hoof derail this thread. But, since it's ruined...

Question for hoof: Would you approve of this guy beating his wife if she was a Republican? You've previously endorsed assault on people you disagree with politically, and I'm sure you're interested in being consistent.


You always ask the best questions.

She’s not a nazi, is she?

What if she laid in front of a tank?

_________________
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 10228
HokieHam wrote:
Foundation In "Russian Uranium Dominance Strategy"

Quote:
Undercover FBI informant William Campbell has given written testimony to Congressional investigators after an "iron clad" gag order was lifted in October
Campbell was a highly valued CIA and FBI asset deeply embedded in the Russian nuclear industry while Robert Mueller was the Director of the FBI
Campbell was required by the Russians, under threat, to launder large sums of money - which allowed the FBI to uncover a massive Russian "nuclear money laundering apparatus"
He collected over 5,000 documents and briefs over a six year period, some of which detail efforts by Moscow to route money to the Clinton Foundation
Campbell claims to have video evidence of bribe money related to the Uranium One deal being stuffed into suitcases.
The Obama FBI knew about the bribery scheme, yet the administration still approved the Uranium One deal.
To thank him for his service, Campbell was paid $51,000 by FBI officials at a 2016 celebration dinner in Chrystal City
When it emerged that Campbell had evidence against the Clinton Foundation, a Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff (of FISA warrant application fame) slammed Campbell as a "disaster" potential witness


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-08/fbi-informant-testifies-moscow-routed-millions-clinton-foundation-russian-uranium


Ron Burgandy would say that this is a pretty big deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 19961
Location: Fake Dossier Writing Center
Party: Draintheswamp
HooFighter wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
You guys sure let Hoof derail this thread. But, since it's ruined...

Question for hoof: Would you approve of this guy beating his wife if she was a Republican? You've previously endorsed assault on people you disagree with politically, and I'm sure you're interested in being consistent.


You always ask the best questions.

She’s not a nazi, is she?

What if she laid in front of a tank?


Hate to break this to you, but Nazis have been gone a long time. The dude who got sucker punched never hurt anyone that I'm aware of, let alone shoving jews in railcars. Calling people you disagree with politically "nazis", is not great form - makes you look like an emotional child.

Laying in front of a moving tank is suicide. I'm OK with suicide - particularly when it's idiots removing themselves from the gene pool.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Time zone: America/New_York


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: