http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26373
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
Pretty reasonable.
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
You're a factual inaccuracy. The FBI said nothing in the memo is false.HokieFanDC wrote:Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
you may want to read further down your link, did the footnote include that none of the Steel dossier "facts" could be proven? Did the footnote explain that the Clinton campaign had fed info to Steele and paid millions for his "facts"...... kinda doubt itHokieFanDC wrote:Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
Never mind that McCabe TESTIFIED that without the Steel fake report there would be no shot at getting a FISA warrant
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Independent
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
Whooshawesome guy wrote:You're a factual inaccuracy. The FBI said nothing in the memo is false.HokieFanDC wrote:Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
The whoosh is over your head.ElbertoHokie wrote:Whooshawesome guy wrote:You're a factual inaccuracy. The FBI said nothing in the memo is false.HokieFanDC wrote:Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Here’s a good round up of this whole thing.
"did the footnote include that none of the Steel dossier "facts" could be proven?"cwtcr hokie wrote:you may want to read further down your link, did the footnote include that none of the Steel dossier "facts" could be proven? Did the footnote explain that the Clinton campaign had fed info to Steele and paid millions for his "facts"...... kinda doubt itHokieFanDC wrote:Agree. Both sides throw out Watergate, including people like Bernstein, who was actually involved. All those people deserve eye rolls.HokieHam wrote:Pretty reasonable.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/sto ... te-happen/If you’re trying to get up to speed, it feels a bit like suddenly immersing yourself in theories about the Kennedy assassination. There are so many partial and equivocal facts that it’s easy for people to spin them in a partisan way, particularly if they’re hoping it will turn into another Watergate. And both sides want it to be Watergate, either for the Trump administration or for the Obama administration.
And of course, it mentions the factual inaccuracies of the Nunes memo that some people couldn't grok.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ ... ant-390795
Never mind that McCabe TESTIFIED that without the Steel fake report there would be no shot at getting a FISA warrant
No, because that would a lie.
"Did the footnote explain that the Clinton campaign had fed info to Steele and paid millions for his "facts""
No, because the applications don't usually name names in that fashion.