United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Cpt Jagdish wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieJoe wrote:
We're still $20 trillion GD dollars in debt BTW. Instead of the press focusing on that for the prior 9 years, we get stupidity like this.

Pretty much this.

Don't kid yourself. It's probably because no one cares? This administration just proposed a budget that would add trillions to the deficit (and they make no qualms about it) and it's crickets on this board.

I am still waiting for your screaming about what Obummer did with his 8 years and the debt

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:
Go away then, if you think it's crap.

There's that liberal tolerance for differing opinions that we all love...

Has nothing to do with tolerance. You're inserting your opinion on a subject that you admit you haven't paid attention to, and your opinion is simply that it's crap.
You don't have a "differing" opinion, you have an opinion based on your emotional reaction to anything that goes against Trump.
Why would anyone have a discussion with someone who doesn't know anything about the subject they're talking about, and has stated that it's all crap?

Take the adjudication issue. The adjudication of the clearance lies within the control of the WH. The FBI finished their investigation in July '17. The WH security ppl have been working on the clearance since then, and have not issued that clearance. They had enough concern about the "crap" to keep them from issuing a clearance. IMO, that indicates that the findings were more than "crap".
And then you add in the shifting storied from the WH. Why would they do that?

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:
Go away then, if you think it's crap.

There's that liberal tolerance for differing opinions that we all love...

Has nothing to do with tolerance. You're inserting your opinion on a subject that you admit you haven't paid attention to, and your opinion is simply that it's crap.
You don't have a "differing" opinion, you have an opinion based on your emotional reaction to anything that goes against Trump.
Why would anyone have a discussion with someone who doesn't know anything about the subject they're talking about, and has stated that it's all crap?

Take the adjudication issue. The adjudication of the clearance lies within the control of the WH. The FBI finished their investigation in July '17. The WH security ppl have been working on the clearance since then, and have not issued that clearance. They had enough concern about the "crap" to keep them from issuing a clearance. IMO, that indicates that the findings were more than "crap".
And then you add in the shifting storied from the WH. Why would they do that?

That's not how it works. They have to investigate in Rome, where this event allegedly happened. Investigating overseas instantly adds months to the process.

awesome guy wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:
Go away then, if you think it's crap.

There's that liberal tolerance for differing opinions that we all love...

Has nothing to do with tolerance. You're inserting your opinion on a subject that you admit you haven't paid attention to, and your opinion is simply that it's crap.
You don't have a "differing" opinion, you have an opinion based on your emotional reaction to anything that goes against Trump.
Why would anyone have a discussion with someone who doesn't know anything about the subject they're talking about, and has stated that it's all crap?

Take the adjudication issue. The adjudication of the clearance lies within the control of the WH. The FBI finished their investigation in July '17. The WH security ppl have been working on the clearance since then, and have not issued that clearance. They had enough concern about the "crap" to keep them from issuing a clearance. IMO, that indicates that the findings were more than "crap".
And then you add in the shifting storied from the WH. Why would they do that?

That's not how it works. They have to investigate in Rome, where this event allegedly happened. Investigating overseas instantly adds months to the process.

The FBI investigation ended in July. Their responses to the WH follow up questions ended in January.

cwtcr hokie wrote:

Cpt Jagdish wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieJoe wrote:
We're still $20 trillion GD dollars in debt BTW. Instead of the press focusing on that for the prior 9 years, we get stupidity like this.

Pretty much this.

Don't kid yourself. It's probably because no one cares? This administration just proposed a budget that would add trillions to the deficit (and they make no qualms about it) and it's crickets on this board.

I am still waiting for your screaming about what Obummer did with his 8 years and the debt

Why would I? I've never posted on this board claiming to be concerned about any administration doing it. Unlike this post:

HokieJoe wrote:
We're still $20 trillion GD dollars in debt BTW. Instead of the press focusing on that for the prior 9 years, we get stupidity like this.

Cpt Jagdish wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

Cpt Jagdish wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieJoe wrote:
We're still $20 trillion GD dollars in debt BTW. Instead of the press focusing on that for the prior 9 years, we get stupidity like this.

Pretty much this.

Don't kid yourself. It's probably because no one cares? This administration just proposed a budget that would add trillions to the deficit (and they make no qualms about it) and it's crickets on this board.

I am still waiting for your screaming about what Obummer did with his 8 years and the debt

Why would I? I've never posted on this board claiming to be concerned about any administration doing it. Unlike this post:

HokieJoe wrote:
We're still $20 trillion GD dollars in debt BTW. Instead of the press focusing on that for the prior 9 years, we get stupidity like this.

ummmm... this seems like concern to me: "This administration just proposed a budget that would add trillions to the deficit (and they make no qualms about it) and it's crickets on this board."