Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys are also missing the fact fhat these artists were former tenants.
Being a tenant allows one to vandalize the building?
When it’s rented out to be a graffiti museum, yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What rent did they pay?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys are also missing the fact fhat these artists were former tenants.
Being a tenant allows one to vandalize the building?
When it’s rented out to be a graffiti museum, yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What rent did they pay?
It’s in the article.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13123
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Post by HokieJoe »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.
You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Atta boy...
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Post by 133743Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys are also missing the fact fhat these artists were former tenants.
Being a tenant allows one to vandalize the building?
When it’s rented out to be a graffiti museum, yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It wasn't rented out as a graffiti museum
Post Reply