Page 1 of 3

Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:48 am
by ip_law-hokie
on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:58 am
by awesome guy
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:11 am
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:15 am
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:20 am
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:21 am
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:23 am
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then
Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:31 am
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then
Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:54 am
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: Acting out 6.75 million times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then
Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh
It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:19 am
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then
Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh
It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Another in depth/inept explanation.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:44 am
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Explain it then
Legally, you should start with the VARA.

Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh huh
It was more for the grownups, but good work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Another in depth/inept explanation.
Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:56 am
by awesome guy
[quote="ip_law-hokie"][/quote]

Image

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:41 pm
by 133743Hokie
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:50 pm
by awesome guy
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
IP should be cautious about supporting lawsuits for meanness and pettiness. Some gangster could also tag his fence around his 2x10 backyard and then he can't paint it over or tear it down.

No way this stands. I think it's time we impeach these kook judges, like the one that blocked DACA dissolution, as the judicial branch is out of control. Their power has gone to their heads.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:50 pm
by HokieJoe
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:01 pm
by CFB Apologist
ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
Apparently Jeter wants to remove that hideous mural in centerfield of MArlins Park that looks to be designed by a blind 6 year old, but he can't because it is considered "art" or some bullshit. This sounds like much of the same. 99% of NYC is a craphole, anyway.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:06 pm
by CFB Apologist
So, If I read correctly, if he would have just torn down the buildings as planned, as as his right as property owner, there would have been no issue?? LOL- tear down graffit- no big deal, oh well "artist" too bad your art was torn down for high rises.. BUT PAINT over it before tear down?? nope, that will cost you 6.7 million. LOL- the judge should give that money to the thousands of starving kids in NYC.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:07 pm
by CFB Apologist
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:32 pm
by oaktonhokie
That happens to be high quality outdoor aerosol art.


ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:58 pm
by RiverguyVT
ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.

And it appears the court nailed it too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e

Life ain’t always what it seems when you come from out of town...huh-huh—huh-huh.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:42 pm
by ip_law-hokie
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.
You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:43 pm
by ip_law-hokie
CFB Apologist wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous
That’s incorrect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:49 pm
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.
You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:53 pm
by ip_law-hokie
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.
You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.
Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.

My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:59 pm
by awesome guy
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.

The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.
You’d be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.
Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.

My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Weird control freaks with more contempt than ability. Yep, twinsies.