Today is "Australia has banned guns and don't have shootings

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Today is "Australia has banned guns and don't have shoot

Post by 133743Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What? AR-15s are protected
Nope.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/as ... es-n724106




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So an appeals court for a ruling in MD means they aren't protected? Tell me you have more than that.
Just a case directly on point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A narrow case from Maryland that has just gotten to the appeals court. Considering that they are still for sale, I hope you don't mind that I'm not gonna hang my hat on that being the definitive answer re constitutionality.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Today is "Australia has banned guns and don't have shoot

Post by ip_law-hokie »

133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What? AR-15s are protected
Nope.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/as ... es-n724106




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So an appeals court for a ruling in MD means they aren't protected? Tell me you have more than that.
Just a case directly on point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A narrow case from Maryland that has just gotten to the appeals court. Considering that they are still for sale, I hope you don't mind that I'm not gonna hang my hat on that being the definitive answer re constitutionality.
It’s OK to admit that you were wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Today is "Australia has banned guns and don't have shoot

Post by 133743Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote: What? AR-15s are protected
Nope.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/as ... es-n724106




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So an appeals court for a ruling in MD means they aren't protected? Tell me you have more than that.
Just a case directly on point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A narrow case from Maryland that has just gotten to the appeals court. Considering that they are still for sale, I hope you don't mind that I'm not gonna hang my hat on that being the definitive answer re constitutionality.
It’s OK to admit that you were wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I do, when i am. How about you (as we scroll thru several current threads!)?
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Today is "Australia has banned guns and don't have shootings

Post by ip_law-hokie »

133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: Nope.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/as ... es-n724106




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So an appeals court for a ruling in MD means they aren't protected? Tell me you have more than that.
Just a case directly on point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A narrow case from Maryland that has just gotten to the appeals court. Considering that they are still for sale, I hope you don't mind that I'm not gonna hang my hat on that being the definitive answer re constitutionality.
It’s OK to admit that you were wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I do, when i am. How about you (as we scroll thru several current threads!)?
You’ve made so many objectively inaccurate statements contained in this thread alone, I wouldn’t be talking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Post Reply