BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
It's our whole constitution, not just the 2nd amendment. It's the whole collection of freedoms that we have. We're unique.
Gun freedoms cost more lives than other freedoms.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You could not be more wrong. The freedom to eat disgusting fried foods- available on every corner for cheap- kills 100 fold more people than guns.
BG Hokie wrote:And actually I think it's insane that over a half of 1% of America's deaths come at the hands of guns. Fair to say that's the leader in the clubhouse relative to other countries, correct? A good example of our freedom being costly with respect to human life.
And how many more lives do our freedoms:
1- save
2- improve the quality of
?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
It's our whole constitution, not just the 2nd amendment. It's the whole collection of freedoms that we have. We're unique.
Gun freedoms cost more lives than other freedoms.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh...yeaaahhh, -No.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The AR15 is the most popular gun in America. They pop up in more crimes for the same reason that F150s and Camrys show up on more car accidents.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
It's our whole constitution, not just the 2nd amendment. It's the whole collection of freedoms that we have. We're unique.
Gun freedoms cost more lives than other freedoms.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm pretty sure the "right to privacy" takes that title. 652,639 legal abortions in 2014 per the CDC.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Left Wing doesn't know what an AR15 is, does, or is used for. Doesn't stop them from using that lie/falsehood to scare people though. Their knowledge of guns is minuscule, but you listen to them.
But he’s “got it”.....
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
of course if it was not a gun free zone and he would have faced any resistance his kill count would have been zero or close to zero
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any other rifle with a clip is just as useful as the scary "ar-15"
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any other rifle with a clip is just as useful as the scary "ar-15"
Dental floss could have done the trick too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any other rifle with a clip is just as useful as the scary "ar-15"
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any other rifle with a clip is just as useful as the scary "ar-15"
Dental floss could have done the trick too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is the argument that pisses me off. The AR15 is no more dangerous than a 9MM handgun- that is a fact. That is not opinion, that is not hyperbole, that is not a talking point it is a fact. "Automatic" weapons were banned in the US for civilian use in 1930. The "AR15" which you claim in "much more dangerous, scary, barbaric, etc" with your stupid dental floss comment is just flat wrong. Zero truth or fact in that- zero. It is a .223 (in some cases) semi automatic rifle. Simple. Fact. It's nothing more. In fact- a semi automatic shotgun- which doesn't get your panties bunched up for some reason, is much more dangerous and powerful than a civilian AR15. 98% of handguns made today are "semi-automatic" just like the barbaric AR15, which you claim has some super scary power. You are wrong, 100%, but you and the liberal media keep pushing a narrative so that you can take freedoms away from law abiding citizens. It's sick.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any other rifle with a clip is just as useful as the scary "ar-15"
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
It's our whole constitution, not just the 2nd amendment. It's the whole collection of freedoms that we have. We're unique.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
BG Hokie wrote:Yeah, mass shooting are certainly the emotional ones. The same question applies to all shootings, however, and I'm surprised I can't get an answer from anybody on this board.
When it comes to our disproportionate gun homicide rate relative to other countries, I think it's safe to say our 2nd amendment freedom is costly, correct?
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’d say a vigorous defense of any and all gun rights is costly, not necessarily the 2nd amendment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I understand what you are trying to argue.
The right wing has instilled the notion that AR-15s, bump stocks and other barbaric excrement is protected by the Second Amendment when they often are not.
So an appeals court for a ruling in MD means they aren't protected? Tell me you have more than that.
Just a case directly on point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Just a case directly on point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The AR15 falls into any reasonable interpretation of the definition laid out in Heller. The 4CA decision was horrible and it was a shame the SCOTUS didn't take it - partially because both sides were worried about how Kennedy would side.
Now, when Kennedy retires and the Grim Reaper catches up with RBG.....