California waiting period and fees not a problem

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by ip_law-hokie »

SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
I like it. I like the fees too.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
CFB Apologist
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by CFB Apologist »

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
A "lawyer" that confuses "will not hear the case" with "leaving the laws intact" as if they somehow confirmed it/endorsed it. Interesting
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by USN_Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by ip_law-hokie »

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.
My language is correct.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
I like it. I like the fees too.
of course, you like paying more taxes, most of us don't

you can stroke a check to any gov. entity when you want to, they will not reject it
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by USN_Hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.
My language is correct.
If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by ip_law-hokie »

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.
My language is correct.
If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.
I'll go with you misreading what I typed.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
Hokie5150
Posts: 3343
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:11 pm

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by Hokie5150 »

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.
User avatar
Hokie5150
Posts: 3343
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:11 pm

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by Hokie5150 »

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by HokieJoe »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
I like it. I like the fees too.

You're probably fully on board with voter id then.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by HokieJoe »

Hokie5150 wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem

Post by ip_law-hokie »

HokieJoe wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.
Eh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Post Reply