United We Stand - uwsboard.com

SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally

I like it. I like the fees too.

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

A "lawyer" that confuses "will not hear the case" with "leaving the laws intact" as if they somehow confirmed it/endorsed it. Interesting

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.

My language is correct.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally

I like it. I like the fees too.

of course, you like paying more taxes, most of us don't

you can stroke a check to any gov. entity when you want to, they will not reject it

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.

My language is correct.

If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.

My language is correct.

If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.

I'll go with you misreading what I typed.

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on it

it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally

I like it. I like the fees too.

You're probably fully on board with voter id then.

Hokie5150 wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.

HokieJoe wrote:

Hokie5150 wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c

But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.

Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.

Eh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk